Skip to main content
Archived

SEO Report for https://servexpert.ro

Your general SEO Checkup Score


SEO Score69/100
Average SEO score of top 100 sites: 75%This value indicates the average SEO score of the top 100 most visited websites in the US (in the past 12 months)
AI Visibility75/100
AI visibility score reflects brand reach in AI

Your site scored 69/100, below the 75 average for top sites. We found 15 issues to fix, and clearing them is how you move up. And an AI Visibility Score of 75/100 means ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity mention your brand some of the time, with clear room to push further.

15 Failed
6 Warnings
42 Passed

Want to fix these issues and track your progress?

Issues to fix

HIGH
To improve the website experience for your visitors, it is recommended to eliminate any render-blocking resources on this webpage.
Details
HIGH
Users may abandon pages that take longer than 5 seconds to load, resulting in a potential loss of up to 50% of visitors. Faster loading pages can lead to increased traffic, better conversions, and higher sales.
Details
HIGH
To ensure that Search Engines can accurately identify the topic of this webpage, it is important to include the most common keywords in the title tag, meta description, and heading tags.
Details
HIGH
JavaScript errors can impact user experience and may prevent users from viewing the page properly.
Details
MEDIUM
Serve properly sized images to reduce page loading times and to improve user's experience.
Details
MEDIUM
To provide a good user experience, Google recommends that sites should aim for a Time To First Byte value of 0.8 seconds or less.
Details
MEDIUM
To provide a good user experience, Google recommends that sites should aim for a First Contentful Paint value of 1.8 seconds or less.
Details
MEDIUM
Avoid performance and security issues by adding "rel=noopener" or "rel=noreferrer" to your "target=_blank" links.
Details
LOW
Consider reducing the HTML size to improve loading times and retain visitors.
Details
LOW
Reducing the Document Object Model (DOM) size can lead to faster page loading times, improved site performance, and better user experience by decreasing the amount of time it takes for the browser to process and render the page.
Details
LOW
Resolving errors identified by the Chrome DevTools Console can improve user experience.
Details
LOW
Using more than 20 HTTP requests on a webpage can negatively impact the loading time.
Details
LOW
Consider adding the Strict-Transport-Security header to your webpage to ensure that web traffic is encrypted over HTTPS, mitigating the risk of man-in-the-middle attacks and other security threats.
Details

AI Insights

Score:0
Failed:0
Warnings:0
Passed:5
Domain Business Context
Understanding the business context of a domain can help you create content that is more relevant to your target audience and differentiate your website from competitors.

What is this domain about

Online store for professional cleaning equipment, detergents, consumables, spare parts, and protective gear.

Industry Niche

Professional Cleaning Supplies E-commerce

Target Audience

Cleaning businesses, facility managers, hospitality operators, and other buyers needing professional hygiene products and advice.

This test will check the business context of the domain associated with the analyzed webpage. The business context includes the domain's description, target audience and industry niche (if applicable). Understanding the business context of a domain can help you create content that is more relevant to your target audience and differentiate your website from competitors.
LLM Visibility Checker
LLM Visibility Checker

Track your brand across ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude

Get an AI Presence Score, see which of your pages get cited, and follow how you compare with competitors over time.

How visible your brand is to AI engines
Content Strengths and Weaknesses

This webpage is commercially focused and clearly organized around professional cleaning products, with strong product coverage and practical buying cues. However, the content is heavily product-led and lacks deeper educational, editorial, or trust-building detail beyond basic store information.

Content Strengths

  • Clear Product Categorization
  • Strong Commercial Intent
  • Brand Variety Displayed

Content Weaknesses

  • Limited Editorial Depth
  • Few Educational Resources
  • Weak Source Attribution
This test will analyze the content of the webpage to identify its strengths and weaknesses. The analysis includes factors such as keyword usage, readability, originality, and relevance to the target audience. By understanding the strengths and weaknesses of your content, you can make informed decisions about how to improve it and better meet the needs of your audience.
Content Trust
72%
Topical Relevance96%
Subject Expertise74%
Credibility60%

This webpage appears moderately trustworthy because it includes concrete business details, policy links, contact information, a physical address, phone numbers, and payment and return pages. Trust is reduced by the lack of named authors, leadership bios, cited sources, or third-party validation for product claims and testimonials.

This test will evaluate the trustworthiness of the content on the webpage. It assesses factors such as the credibility of sources, accuracy of information, and overall reliability. A high level of content trust can enhance your website's reputation and improve its ranking in search engine results.
Visual SEO Analysis
Visual SEO Analysis

Find out if your page design converts the visitors you earn

We score six things that decide whether a visitor stays and acts, from the first screen to the path to action, and rank every fix by effort and impact.

How your page's design and UX affect conversions
Content Freshness
84%

The page feels current as a live e-commerce homepage with active product listings, promotional labels, and operational details such as delivery, payment, and support. There are no strong signs of stale core content; the only dated element is the footer copyright year, which is a minor signal on a commerce page.

Positive Signals

  • Active product listings
  • Promotional and stock labels
  • Current operational service details

Staleness Signals

  • Footer copyright 2025
This test will check the freshness of the content on the webpage. It evaluates how recently the content was created or updated, and whether it remains relevant to current trends and user interests. Fresh content can attract more visitors and improve your website's ranking in search engine results.
Content Opportunities

The site already covers a broad commercial catalog, but it has room to expand from a product showcase into a more authoritative buying resource. The biggest opportunities are educational content, stronger comparison tools, and richer trust signals that help buyers choose the right professional cleaning solution.

Quick Wins

  • •Add a short FAQ block to the homepage answering the top three buyer questions about delivery, compatibility, and maintenance.
  • •Insert a simple comparison table for the most similar product families, such as monodiscs or mop systems.
  • •Replace anonymous testimonials with verified customer quotes that include full names, roles, or company names.
This test will identify potential content opportunities for the webpage. It analyzes the current content landscape, identifies gaps in coverage, and suggests topics or keywords that could be targeted to attract more visitors and improve search engine rankings.

Common SEO issues

Score:65
Failed:4
Warnings:2
Passed:13
Meta Title Test
100% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is using a title tag with a length of 71 characters. While there's no target number of characters, titles should be descriptive and concise. We recommend using a title with a length between 20 - 60 characters in order to fit Google Search results that have a 600-pixel limit.
Text: Echipamente si produse profesionale de curatenie la preturi avantajoase
Length: 71 characters
The meta title is an HTML element that defines a page's title, displayed in search engine results, browser tabs, and bookmark lists. A concise, keyword-relevant title is a strong on-page ranking signal and a major driver of organic click-through rate. AI answer engines and LLM-driven search experiences also rely on the title to identify, summarize, and cite the page in generative results.
Meta Description Test
92% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is using a meta description tag.
Text: Va oferim echipamente de curatenie, aspiratoare si carucioare profesionale curatenie, detergenti, mopuri si alte accesorii. Alege produse de calitate pentru igiena.
Length: 166 characters
The meta description is an HTML tag that provides a short summary of a page's content, often shown beneath the title in search results. While not a direct ranking factor, an accurate and inviting description significantly improves click-through rate from organic listings. AI answer engines and social platforms also use it as a trusted summary when generating previews, citations and shareable snippets.
Google Search Results Preview Test
Desktop version
https://www.servexpert.ro/Echipamente si produse profesionale de curatenie la preturi avantajoaseVa oferim echipamente de curatenie, aspiratoare si carucioare profesionale curatenie, detergenti, mopuri si alte accesorii. Alege produse de calitate pentru igiena.
Mobile version
https://www.servexpert.ro/Echipamente si produse profesionale de curatenie la preturi avantajoaseVa oferim echipamente de curatenie, aspiratoare si carucioare profesionale curatenie, detergenti, mopuri si alte accesorii. Alege produse de calitate pentru igiena.
A simulated preview of how the page may appear in Google search results, combining the title, URL, and meta description as Google typically renders them. Useful for spotting truncated text, weak phrasing, or missing elements before publishing, since the snippet directly influences whether searchers click through.
Social Media Meta Tags Test
89% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is using social media meta tags.
Open Graph Meta Tags
og:typewebsite
og:titleServExpert
og:urlhttps://www.servexpert.ro/
og:imagehttps://www.servexpert.ro/image/cache/catalog/header-logo-consultingExpert-600x600h.webp
og:image:width600
og:image:height600
og:descriptionVa oferim echipamente de curatenie, aspiratoare si carucioare profesionale curatenie, detergenti, mopuri si alte accesorii. Alege produse de calitate pentru igiena.
Twitter Card Meta Tags
twitter:cardsummary
twitter:site@
twitter:titleServExpert
twitter:imagehttps://www.servexpert.ro/image/cache/catalog/header-logo-consultingExpert-200x200h.webp
twitter:image:width200
twitter:image:height200
twitter:descriptionVa oferim echipamente de curatenie, aspiratoare si carucioare profesionale curatenie, detergenti, mopuri si alte accesorii. Alege produse de calitate pentru igiena.
Open Graph and Twitter Card meta tags tell social platforms and link unfurlers how to display a page when its URL is shared. Well-formed tags produce richer previews with the intended title, description, and image, which improves click-through on social channels. They also serve as a structured signal that AI crawlers and answer engines can use when summarizing the page.
Most Common Keywords Test
There is likely no optimal keyword density (search engine algorithms have evolved beyond keyword density metrics as a significant ranking factor). It can be useful, however, to note which keywords appear most often on your page and if they reflect the intended topic of your page. More importantly, the keywords on your page should appear within natural sounding and grammatically correct copy.
100adaugă
66sprintus
57pentru
54curățenie
51favorite
A frequency analysis of the most repeated words and phrases in the page's visible content. Useful for getting a quick sense of which topics search engines are likely to associate with the page, and for spotting cases where the actual content drifts from the intended subject.
Keywords Usage Test
48% of top 100 sites passed
The most common keywords of this webpage are not distributed across the important HTML tags! Primary keywords should appear in title tag, meta description and heading tags to help Search Engines to properly identify the topic of this webpage.
Keyword
Title tag
Meta description
Headings
adaugă
sprintus
pentru
curățenie
favorite
Cross-checks whether the most frequently used keywords on the page also appear in the title and meta description. Alignment between body content and metadata helps search engines confirm the page's topic and reinforces relevance for those terms.
Keywords Cloud Test
accesorii
aceste
adaugă
aluminiu
aspirare
aspiratoare
aspirator
automat
botoșei
calitate
care
cele
clemă
click
comenzi
compact
compară
complet
consumabile
cont
cookie
cookies
covoare
curățare
curățenie
cărucior
deoarece
despre
detergent
detergenți
dezinfectant
dintr
dispenser
echipament
echipamente
echipat
electric
este
extracție
favorite
foarte
folosință
fără
geamuri
generator
google
gratuit
ideal
informatii
injecție
inteligent
intrebare
lichid
lindhaus
livrare
magic
mașini
microfibră
monodisc
monodiscuri
mâner
nebulizator
ofertă
pachet
paduri
particule
pentru
personale
piese
poliester
politica
prin
producator
produs
produse
profesional
profesionale
profesionali
promo
protecție
reprezintă
rezerve
schimb
servexpert
site
small
sprintus
spălare
sunt
suprafețe
telescopic
toate
transport
tronsoane
unică
varix
vezi
vizualizeaza
zero
înaltă
A visual word cloud of the page's content, with more frequent terms shown in larger text. Provides a quick at-a-glance view of which words dominate the page, helping confirm that the visible content reflects the intended topic.
Competitor Domains Test
Competitor Domains

Understand your competitors' SEO and backlink profile

Get related competitors and their domain authority score in relation to your domain.

Identifies up to ten domains that compete for similar organic search results, ranked by overall domain authority based on the volume and quality of their backlink profiles. Useful for benchmarking the competitive landscape and prioritizing which sites to study for content and link-building strategy.
Heading Tags Test
62% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage contains headings tags.
H1 tags
ServExpert
Servexpert - partenerul tău în produse de curățenie!
Inspects the page for H1 and H2 heading tags and reports their structure. Headings give both users and search engines a clear outline of the page's topics, with the H1 acting as the primary subject and H2s framing major sections. A clean heading hierarchy also helps AI answer engines segment the content into discrete passages they can quote or summarize.
Robots.txt Test
99% of top 100 sites passed
This website is using a robots.txt file.
Verifies whether the site exposes a robots.txt file at the root domain. This file is the first resource most crawlers request, telling search engines and other bots which paths they may or may not access. It is also the standard mechanism for allowing or blocking modern AI crawlers used by training pipelines and answer engines.
Sitemap Test
83% of top 100 sites passed
This website has a sitemap file.
Looks for an XML sitemap on the site and reports whether one is published. Sitemaps give search engines an explicit, machine-readable list of the URLs you want crawled, along with metadata such as last-modified dates, which speeds up discovery of new and updated pages. They are especially useful for large sites or those with weak internal linking.
Image Alt Test
78% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is using "img" tags with empty or missing "alt" attribute!

Image Alt Test

How to pass this test?

Alt attributes provide a text alternative for images, used by screen readers when a user cannot see the image and by search engines and multimodal AI models to understand what the image depicts. Fixing this issue means writing concise, descriptive alt text for every meaningful image on the page, and using empty alt for purely decorative images so assistive technology can skip them. The same alt text helps multimodal LLMs and image search tools surface and cite your visuals.

Example

<img src="/images/marathon-shoes.jpg"
     alt="Side view of a lightweight neon-green marathon running shoe">

<img src="/images/divider.svg" alt="">

Where to make the change

  • Raw HTML: add the alt attribute to every <img> tag. For decorative images, use alt="" so screen readers skip them.
  • WordPress: the media library has an Alt text field on every uploaded image. Fill it once and the value is reused everywhere the image is inserted.
  • Shopify: in the product or page editor, click an image and use the Edit alt text option. Theme code that renders product images should pull image.alt.
  • Wix or Squarespace: click the image in the editor and use the Alt text or Image description field in the side panel.
  • Headless or framework sites: require an alt prop on every image component and lint for missing values during build.

Common causes and how to resolve them

  • Attribute missing: add alt="" at minimum so the page validates. Replace with descriptive text on any image that conveys information.
  • Alt text is the filename: "IMG_4837.jpg" tells the user nothing. Replace with a description of what is in the image.
  • Alt text duplicates the visible caption: screen readers will read both, doubling the user's listening time. Differentiate the alt from the caption or empty the alt.
  • Decorative images get descriptive alt text: background patterns and dividers should use alt="", otherwise screen readers narrate noise.
  • Bulk imports left alt blank: a one-off audit of the media library or a CMS-side script can fill missing alt values from product names, captions, or asset descriptions.

Best practices

  • Describe the function, not just the appearance: for a chart, describe what the chart shows. For a button image, describe what the button does.
  • Keep it concise: aim for under 125 characters. Screen readers do not pause mid-sentence, so long alt text is exhausting to listen to.
  • Skip "image of" or "picture of": the screen reader already announces it as an image.
  • Include the focus keyword when natural: alt text is a minor on-page signal, but stuffing keywords in unnatural alt text harms both accessibility and ranking.
Inspects whether images on the page include descriptive alt attributes. Alt text provides accessibility for screen readers, a fallback when images fail to load, and a textual signal that helps search engines understand image content. It also improves how AI crawlers and image search tools interpret and surface the visuals.
Responsive Image Test
29% of top 100 sites passed
Not all images in this webpage are properly sized! This webpage is serving images that are larger than needed for the size of the user's viewport.

Responsive Image Test

How to pass this test?

This test fails when one or more images on the page are served at dimensions significantly larger than the size at which the browser actually renders them. Fixing this issue means resizing the source files (or serving responsive variants) so the bytes downloaded match the pixels actually displayed. The result is faster page loads, lower data usage, and better Core Web Vitals scores.

Example

<img
  src="/images/hero-800.jpg"
  srcset="/images/hero-400.jpg 400w,
          /images/hero-800.jpg 800w,
          /images/hero-1600.jpg 1600w"
  sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 800px"
  alt="Marathon runners at sunrise"
  width="800" height="450">

Where to make the change

  • Raw HTML: use srcset and sizes to let the browser pick the right variant for the user's viewport. Always include intrinsic width and height attributes.
  • WordPress: WordPress generates multiple image sizes automatically. Use the the_post_thumbnail() helper or the block editor's image block, both of which emit responsive srcset markup.
  • Shopify: use the image_url Liquid filter with size parameters (for example {{ image | image_url: width: 800 }}) and pair with image_tag to emit a responsive image.
  • Wix or Squarespace: both platforms generate responsive variants automatically; this issue is typically caused by uploading a deliberately oversized image.
  • Headless or framework sites: use the framework's image component (for example next/image or astro:assets), which generates responsive variants and lazy-loads off-screen images.

Common causes and how to resolve them

  • Original camera or stock-photo file uploaded as-is: a 6000-pixel-wide JPEG rendered in a 400-pixel column wastes most of the bytes. Resize the source or generate responsive variants.
  • No srcset: the browser has no choice but to use the single source. Add multiple variants so mobile users get smaller files.
  • Hero images sized for ultra-wide displays: if your largest layout is 1600 pixels, do not ship a 4000-pixel original.
  • Background images set in CSS without responsive sources: use the image-set() CSS function or media queries to swap in different image files at different breakpoints.

Best practices

  • Generate variants at common widths: 400, 800, 1200, and 1600 pixels covers most viewports cleanly.
  • Always set width and height: intrinsic dimensions let the browser reserve space and avoid layout shift, helping CLS.
  • Lazy-load off-screen images: add loading="lazy" to images below the fold so the browser only downloads them when needed.
  • Pair with modern formats: resizing alone is good; resizing and serving WebP or AVIF compounds the savings.
Compares the natural dimensions of each image to the size at which it is actually rendered in the user's viewport. Serving images significantly larger than needed wastes bandwidth, slows page load, and forces the browser to scale assets unnecessarily, all of which hurt performance and user experience.
Image Aspect Ratio Test
75% of top 100 sites passed
All image display dimensions match the natural aspect ratio.
Compares each image's natural aspect ratio against the ratio at which it is displayed on the page. Significant mismatches result in stretched or squashed visuals that look unprofessional and degrade the user experience.
Deprecated HTML Tags Test
94% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage does not use HTML deprecated tags.
Scans the markup for HTML elements that are no longer part of the modern HTML specification. Deprecated tags may still render today, but browsers can drop support at any time, leading to broken layouts and rendering inconsistencies. Replacing them with current standards keeps the page resilient and easier to maintain.
Google Analytics Test
72% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is using Google Analytics.
Detects whether the page is instrumented with Google Analytics tracking code. Analytics is not an SEO ranking factor, but having reliable traffic and behavior data is essential for measuring the impact of SEO work and identifying opportunities for improvement.
Favicon Test
100% of top 100 sites passed
favicon
This website appears to have a favicon.
Verifies whether the site declares a favicon and that it loads correctly. Favicons appear in browser tabs, bookmarks, and increasingly in search engine result pages, where they reinforce brand recognition and make a listing easier to spot at a glance.
JS Error Test
83% of top 100 sites passed
We've found JavaScript errors on this webpage!

JS Error Test

How to pass this test?

This test fails when the browser encounters JavaScript runtime errors as the page loads. Unhandled errors can break interactive features, leave content unrendered, and signal poor code quality, all of which hurt the user experience that search engines factor into rankings. Fixing this issue means identifying the offending script, reproducing the error in DevTools, and shipping a patch that handles the failure cleanly.

Where to make the change

  • Open browser DevTools: the Console tab lists every error with the file, line number, and stack trace. Reproduce the issue locally and use sourcemaps to map back to the original code.
  • Application code: wrap risky operations in try / catch, validate external data before using it, and provide fallbacks when DOM elements or APIs are missing.
  • Third-party scripts: check whether the error originates in an analytics, advertising, or chat-widget script. If yes, contact the vendor or load the script with defer so it does not block the rest of the page.

Common causes and how to resolve them

  • Calling a method on null or undefined: guard with optional chaining (?.) or check the value exists before calling.
  • Race condition between the DOM and the script: wait for DOMContentLoaded or place the script tag at the end of <body> with defer.
  • Missing or 404 script file: a typo in the src attribute or a deleted asset triggers a load error. Fix the path or remove the tag.
  • Unsupported syntax in older browsers: if you support legacy browsers, transpile modern JavaScript with a tool such as Babel and serve appropriate polyfills.
  • CORS error blocking a fetch: the API must include the correct Access-Control-Allow-Origin header. Either configure the API or proxy the request through your own backend.

Best practices

  • Add error monitoring: a service such as Sentry, Bugsnag, or Datadog RUM captures errors from real users and groups them by frequency, so you fix what hurts most first.
  • Fail loudly in development, gracefully in production: log unexpected errors but never let them break the rendered page. Show a fallback UI instead of a blank screen.
  • Treat errors as bugs in the build: add lint rules and unit tests for the most common error paths so they cannot ship again.
  • Defer non-critical scripts: using defer or async on third-party scripts limits the blast radius when one of them throws.
Inspects the page for JavaScript runtime errors that occur as it loads. Unhandled errors can break interactive features, leave content unrendered, and signal poor code quality, all of which hurt the user experience that search engines factor into rankings.
Console Errors Test
27% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage has some errors caught by the Chrome DevTools Console!

Console Errors Test

How to pass this test?

Console errors include any unhandled JavaScript exceptions, network request failures, security warnings, or deprecation notices the browser emits while loading the page. Fixing this issue means resolving the underlying problem each error reports rather than suppressing the message. Even errors that do not visibly break the page can degrade performance, leak data, or trip Core Web Vitals.

Where to make the change

  • Open DevTools, Console tab: expand each entry to see the file, line, and stack trace. Right-click an entry to filter, save, or jump to the source.
  • Application code: patch the offending script (see js-errors). For network failures, fix the failing endpoint or remove the stale request.
  • Third-party tags: if the error originates in an analytics, ad, or widget script, update the snippet, switch to the vendor's current loader, or remove unused tags.

Common causes and how to resolve them

  • JavaScript runtime errors: see the JS Error Test fix; the same approach applies.
  • Failed network requests (404 or 5xx): remove the dead request or fix the endpoint. Stale tracking pixels and removed assets are common culprits.
  • Mixed content warnings: the page is HTTPS but loads an HTTP resource. Update the resource URL to https://.
  • CORS or CSP violations: tighten or expand the policy as appropriate. CSP errors usually require allowlisting the offending origin in the response header.
  • Deprecation warnings: update the call site to use the recommended API. These do not break the page today but will when the deprecation cycle completes.

Best practices

  • Treat the console as a build artifact: a clean console is a sign of a healthy page. Aim for zero errors and zero warnings on production routes.
  • Use error monitoring in production: real users hit edge cases your local environment will never reproduce. A monitoring service surfaces them with frequency data.
  • Defer or remove unused third-party scripts: every removed script is one fewer source of console noise.
Reviews the browser console for warnings and errors emitted while the page loads. Console messages often expose underlying issues such as failed network requests, deprecated APIs, or security warnings that can quietly degrade the experience even when the page appears to work.
Charset Declaration Test
96% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage has a character encoding declaration.
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Checks whether the page declares a character encoding such as UTF-8. Without an explicit charset declaration, browsers must guess the encoding, which can lead to garbled symbols, broken accented characters, and inconsistent rendering across devices. UTF-8 is the modern standard recommended by Google.

Speed optimizations

Score:59
Failed:7
Warnings:3
Passed:10
HTML Page Size Test
23% of top 100 sites passed
The size of this webpage's HTML is 89.01 Kb, and is greater than the average size of 33 Kb! This can lead to slower loading times, lost visitors, and decreased revenue. Good steps to reduce HTML size include: using HTML compression, CSS layouts, external style sheets, and moving javascript to external files.

HTML Page Size Test

How to pass this test?

This test fails when the raw HTML document weighs significantly more than necessary, even before counting images, CSS, or JavaScript. Bloated HTML increases time to first byte, slows parsing, and stalls rendering on mobile networks and lower-powered devices. Fixing this issue means trimming inline data, removing legacy markup, and keeping the document focused on what the user needs.

Where to make the change

  • Application code or templates: identify which sections produce the most bytes (often a large inline JSON blob, an inline base64 image, or a giant comment block) and refactor them to load externally or be removed.
  • WordPress: check for plugins or page builders that emit large inline configurations. Disable unused plugins and prefer themes that ship clean markup.
  • Shopify: theme code may inline large product or section JSON. Move heavy data to a fetch-on-demand endpoint when possible.
  • Headless or framework sites: review the rendered output for serialized state (for example __NEXT_DATA__ in Next.js) and trim what is sent on first paint by streaming or lazy-loading non-critical chunks.

Common causes and how to resolve them

  • Inline base64 images or fonts: move them to external files so the browser can cache them across requests.
  • Excessive inline CSS or JavaScript: link to external stylesheets and scripts so they cache. Inline only the truly critical CSS for above-the-fold content.
  • Large server-side JSON payloads: ship only the data needed for first render. Fetch the rest on demand.
  • Repeating boilerplate or commented-out code: strip comments and dead code in the production build.
  • HTML compression disabled: Gzip or Brotli compression often shrinks the response by half or more. Confirm the server sends the appropriate Content-Encoding header.

Best practices

  • Aim for under 100 KB of HTML: most pages can comfortably stay under this. Anything beyond a few hundred KB usually indicates structural bloat worth refactoring.
  • Enable compression: Gzip is the safe minimum, Brotli is even better for HTML and other text formats.
  • Defer non-critical content: rendering only what is needed for the initial viewport keeps both bytes and parse time down.
  • Audit periodically: add HTML size to your performance budget so regressions get caught in CI.
Measures the size of the raw HTML document, excluding images and external CSS or JavaScript. Bloated HTML increases time to first byte and parsing time, slowing down rendering on mobile networks and lower-powered devices. Trimming inline styles, redundant markup, and oversized inline data keeps initial load fast.
DOM Size Test
56% of top 100 sites passed
The Document Object Model (DOM) of this webpage has 4,188 nodes which is greater than the recommended value of 1,500 nodes! A large DOM size negatively affects site performance and increases the page load time.

DOM Size Test

How to pass this test?

This test fails when the page builds a Document Object Model with too many nodes or excessive nesting depth. Large DOMs increase memory usage, lengthen style and layout calculations, and slow rendering, particularly on mobile devices. Fixing this issue means simplifying the markup so the browser has less work to do on every interaction.

Where to make the change

  • Application code or templates: identify the heaviest sections (long lists, repeating components, deep grid wrappers) and either paginate them, virtualize them, or flatten the markup.
  • WordPress: heavy page-builder themes often emit deeply nested wrapper divs. Consider switching templates or using a theme that emits cleaner markup.
  • Headless or framework sites: use a virtualized list component for long item lists so only visible rows are rendered into the DOM.

Common causes and how to resolve them

  • Long lists rendered in full: show a paginated subset or virtualize the list so only on-screen items exist in the DOM.
  • Excessive wrapper divs: a stack of layout wrappers ten deep can usually be flattened to two or three with modern CSS layouts (Grid, Flexbox).
  • Hidden modals and dropdowns kept in the DOM: render them on demand instead of always emitting them with display: none.
  • Third-party widget injecting many nodes: a chat widget or carousel may add hundreds of nodes per page. Lazy-load it after main content renders.

Best practices

  • Aim for under 1500 nodes total and a maximum depth of 32: Lighthouse uses these as warning thresholds and they correlate with smooth rendering on mid-tier mobile devices.
  • Render only what is visible: long lists, accordions, and modals belong outside the initial DOM until needed.
  • Prefer flat semantic markup: a single <article> with a few children is faster than a deeply nested <div> tree.
  • Audit with Lighthouse: the DOM size audit reports the worst-offending elements, which often points at a single template that needs rework.
Measures the size and depth of the page's Document Object Model, the tree of nodes the browser builds from the HTML. Very large DOMs increase memory usage, lengthen style and layout calculations, and slow down rendering, particularly on mobile devices. Keeping the DOM lean improves both load time and runtime responsiveness.
HTML Compression/GZIP Test
99% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is successfully compressed using br compression on your code. The HTML code is compressed from 947.99 Kb to 89.01 Kb (91% size savings). This helps ensure a faster loading webpage and improved user experience.
Verifies whether the server delivers the HTML using a compression algorithm such as Gzip or Brotli. Compressed responses dramatically reduce transfer size with negligible decompression cost, translating directly into faster page loads, especially on slower connections.
Site Loading Speed Test
71% of top 100 sites passed
The loading time of this webpage (measured from N. Virginia, US) is around 5.96 seconds and is greater than the average loading speed which is 5 seconds!
Related Keywords

Accurate historical loading speed monitor and reports

Get detailed and accurate loading speed reports for your websites and see how your pages are being loaded over time.

Measures the overall time required to load the page in the browser. Page speed is a confirmed Google ranking factor and a strong driver of bounce rate, with slower pages losing a meaningful share of users before they even see the content. Faster pages also tend to convert better, making this a key metric for both SEO and revenue.
JS Execution Time Test
53% of top 100 sites passed
The JavaScript code used by this webpage is executed in more than 2 seconds!
Reports the total time the browser spends parsing, compiling, and executing JavaScript while the page loads. Heavy JavaScript work blocks the main thread and is the primary cause of poor Interaction to Next Paint, the Core Web Vital that replaced First Input Delay in 2024 and that Google uses as part of its ranking algorithms. Reducing bundle size and deferring non-critical scripts directly improves perceived performance.
Page Objects Test
7% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is using more than 20 http requests, which can slow down page loading and negatively impact user experience!
Content size by content type
Content type
Percent
Size
javascript
59.8 %
1.43 Mb
font
18.8 %
461.81 Kb
image
13.2 %
324.44 Kb
html
4.1 %
99.56 Kb
css
4.1 %
99.37 Kb
other
0.1 %
1.64 Kb
TOTAL
100%
2.39 Mb
Requests by content type
Content type
Percent
Requests
javascript
36.4 %
28
image
33.8 %
26
css
11.7 %
9
font
9.1 %
7
html
5.2 %
4
other
3.9 %
3
TOTAL
100%
77
Content size by domain
Domain
Percent
Size
servexpert.ro
35.1 %
861.41 Kb
googletagmanager.com
27.5 %
673.24 Kb
gstatic.com
15.9 %
390.83 Kb
connect.facebook.net
8.1 %
199.54 Kb
fonts.gstatic.com
8.0 %
196.64 Kb
static.klaviyo.com
2.0 %
49.32 Kb
google.com
1.3 %
32.27 Kb
rec.smartlook.com
0.9 %
23.00 Kb
static-tracking.klaviyo.com
0.7 %
16.76 Kb
ajax.googleapis.com
0.2 %
5.92 Kb
Other
0.1 %
3.26 Kb
TOTAL
100%
2.39 Mb
Requests by domain
Domain
Percent
Requests
servexpert.ro
54.5 %
42
static.klaviyo.com
11.7 %
9
fonts.gstatic.com
6.5 %
5
googletagmanager.com
5.2 %
4
google.com
3.9 %
3
gstatic.com
3.9 %
3
static-tracking.klaviyo.com
3.9 %
3
rec.smartlook.com
2.6 %
2
connect.facebook.net
2.6 %
2
ajax.googleapis.com
1.3 %
1
Other
3.9 %
3
TOTAL
100%
77
Verifies that every resource the page requests, including images, scripts, stylesheets, and fonts, can be successfully retrieved. Broken or unreachable assets can leave the page rendered incorrectly, trigger console errors, and damage both user experience and how search engines perceive page quality.
CDN Usage Test
95% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is serving all images, javascript and css resources from CDNs.
Detects whether static assets such as images, JavaScript, and CSS are delivered through a Content Delivery Network. CDNs serve files from edge locations close to the user, reducing latency, improving cache hit rates, and offloading traffic from the origin server. The result is faster, more consistent page performance worldwide.
Modern Image Format Test
43% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is using images in a modern format.
Identifies images served in legacy formats such as JPEG and PNG instead of modern alternatives like WebP or AVIF. Modern formats compress significantly better at equivalent visual quality, which means smaller transfers, faster page loads, and lower data usage for visitors on metered connections.
Image Metadata Test
72% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is not using images with large metadata.
Flags images carrying disproportionately large embedded metadata such as EXIF data, thumbnails, color profiles, geolocation, and camera information. This metadata is rarely useful on the web and adds bytes to every request without any rendering benefit, making it an easy win for shrinking image payloads.
Image Caching Test
95% of top 100 sites passed
This website is using cache headers for images and the browsers will display these images from the cache.
Inspects whether image responses include caching headers that allow browsers to store them for repeat visits. With proper caching directives, returning visitors retrieve images from the local cache instead of refetching them, producing noticeably faster subsequent page loads.
JavaScript Caching Test
96% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is using cache headers for all JavaScript resources.
Inspects whether external JavaScript files are served with caching headers that allow browsers to store and reuse them. Cached scripts skip the network on repeat visits, reducing load time and bandwidth for returning users without sacrificing the ability to push fresh code by versioning file URLs.
CSS Caching Test
98% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is using cache headers for all CSS resources.
Inspects whether external CSS files are served with caching headers that allow browsers to store and reuse them. Cached stylesheets skip the network on repeat visits, reducing load time for returning users while still allowing updates through versioned filenames.
JavaScript Minification Test
98% of top 100 sites passed
All JavaScript files used by this webpage are minified.
Detects whether external JavaScript files are minified by stripping whitespace, comments, and shortening identifiers. Minified scripts are substantially smaller and faster to download and parse, which lowers page load time and improves Core Web Vitals scores.
CSS Minification Test
100% of top 100 sites passed
All CSS resources used by this webpage are minified.
Detects whether external CSS files are minified by removing whitespace, comments, and unused characters. Minification reduces stylesheet size with no functional change, leading to faster downloads and quicker first render.
Render Blocking Resources Test
15% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is using render blocking resources! Eliminating render-blocking resources can help this webpage to load significantly faster and will improve the website experience for your visitors.

Render Blocking Resources Test

How to pass this test?

This test fails when JavaScript or CSS resources block the browser from rendering visible content. Each render-blocking file delays the first paint, and on slower networks the cumulative impact can be severe. Fixing this issue means inlining the truly critical CSS, deferring or asynchronously loading non-essential scripts, and removing unused code.

Example

<head>
  <!-- Inline only above-the-fold critical CSS -->
  <style>/* critical styles here */</style>

  <!-- Load full stylesheet asynchronously -->
  <link rel="preload" href="/styles/main.css" as="style"
        onload="this.onload=null;this.rel='stylesheet'">

  <!-- Defer non-critical scripts -->
  <script src="/scripts/app.js" defer></script>
</head>

Where to make the change

  • Application code or templates: identify the CSS and JavaScript needed for the initial render and load only those synchronously. Defer the rest.
  • Build pipeline: use a critical CSS extractor (such as critical or penthouse) to generate the above-the-fold styles automatically.
  • WordPress: performance plugins offer "delay JS execution" and "load CSS asynchronously" options that handle most of this without code changes.
  • Headless or framework sites: use the framework's preload and code-splitting hints to control what blocks rendering.

Common causes and how to resolve them

  • Single large stylesheet blocking render: inline critical CSS for the first viewport, load the full stylesheet asynchronously.
  • Synchronous third-party scripts in the head: add defer or async, or move them to the end of the body.
  • Web fonts blocking text rendering: add font-display: swap in @font-face rules so the fallback font shows immediately.
  • Render-blocking @import in CSS: replace with separate <link rel="stylesheet"> tags so the browser can fetch them in parallel.

Best practices

  • Use defer for scripts that need the DOM: they execute after parsing but before DOMContentLoaded.
  • Use async for fully independent scripts: they execute as soon as they download, in any order.
  • Preload the critical request chain: tell the browser early about fonts and key assets with <link rel="preload">.
  • Audit with Lighthouse: the Render-blocking resources audit lists every offending file with the estimated time saved by deferring it.
Identifies JavaScript and CSS resources that the browser must download and process before it can render visible content. Each render-blocking file delays the first paint, and on slower networks the cumulative impact can be severe. Inlining critical styles, deferring non-essential scripts, and removing unused code all help unblock the rendering path.
URL Redirects Test
97% of top 100 sites passed
This URL performed 1 redirects! While redirects are typically not advisable (as they can affect search engine indexing issues and adversely affect site loading time), one redirect may be acceptable, particularly if the URL is redirecting from a non-www version to its www version, or vice-versa.
Counts the number of HTTP redirects required for the URL to resolve to its final destination. Each hop adds latency and can dilute link equity, while long redirect chains sometimes confuse crawlers and indexing pipelines. Keeping redirects short and direct is a Google recommendation for both performance and SEO.
Time To First Byte Test
99% of top 100 sites passed
The Time To First Byte value of this webpage is 1.955 seconds. To provide a good user experience, Google recommends that sites should strive to have a TTFB of 0.8 seconds or less.
1.955 s
0.8 s
1.8 s

Time To First Byte Test

How to pass this test?

Time to First Byte (TTFB) measures the delay between the browser requesting the page and the first byte of the response arriving. TTFB reflects backend, network, and CDN performance and effectively sets the floor for every other loading metric, since rendering cannot begin until bytes start flowing. Fixing this issue usually means improving server response time, adding edge caching, or reducing redirect chains.

Where to make the change

  • Server and hosting: upgrade to a faster host plan, move to a region closer to your users, and enable HTTP/2 or HTTP/3.
  • CDN: putting the site behind a CDN dramatically reduces TTFB for users far from the origin server. Cache HTML responses at the edge whenever possible.
  • Application code: profile slow endpoints, cache expensive database queries and external API calls, and use streaming or partial responses.

Common causes and how to resolve them

  • Slow server processing: profile the slowest controllers or routes. Database queries, N+1 loops, and synchronous third-party API calls are typical culprits.
  • No edge caching: caching HTML at the CDN reduces TTFB to a single edge round trip. Use rules to bypass cache for logged-in users.
  • Long redirect chains: each hop adds latency before bytes flow. Collapse chains so the URL the user requests resolves to its final destination in one step.
  • Origin in a distant region: a US-only origin makes Asian users wait. Add edge regions or move the origin closer to the audience.
  • HTTP/1.1 or no keep-alive: upgrading to HTTP/2 or HTTP/3 reduces connection setup overhead.

Best practices

  • Target sub-800 millisecond TTFB at the 75th percentile: Google's recommended threshold for a "good" experience.
  • Cache aggressively: the cheapest server work is the work you never do. Static and semi-static pages should be served from cache.
  • Use HTTP/3 where supported: it eliminates head-of-line blocking and reduces handshake latency, especially on mobile networks.
  • Stream the response when possible: sending the head before the rest of the body lets the browser start fetching subresources earlier.
Measures Time to First Byte, the delay between the browser requesting the page and the first byte of the response arriving. TTFB reflects backend, network, and CDN performance and effectively sets the floor for every other loading metric, since rendering cannot begin until bytes start flowing. Sustained high TTFB usually points to slow server processing, missing edge caching, or inefficient redirects.
First Contentful Paint Test
90% of top 100 sites passed
The First Contentful Paint value of this webpage is 3.384 seconds. To provide a good user experience, Google recommends that sites should strive to have a First Contentful Paint value of 1.8 seconds or less.
3.384 s
1.8 s
3 s

First Contentful Paint Test

How to pass this test?

First Contentful Paint (FCP) measures the time from when the page starts loading to when any part of its content is rendered on the screen. FCP is the user's first visual confirmation that the page is loading, and faster values are strongly correlated with lower bounce rates and better Core Web Vitals scores. Fixing this issue means reducing time to first byte, eliminating render-blocking resources, and serving above-the-fold content without delay.

Where to make the change

  • Server and CDN: reduce TTFB so the browser receives bytes sooner. Edge caching for HTML produces dramatic FCP wins.
  • Application code or templates: inline the critical CSS for above-the-fold content and defer everything not needed for the first paint.
  • Build pipeline: ensure JavaScript bundles are split so the initial load only includes what is needed for first render.

Common causes and how to resolve them

  • Slow TTFB: address the underlying server, redirect, or hosting issue (see Time to First Byte fix).
  • Render-blocking CSS: inline the critical CSS for the first viewport, load the full stylesheet asynchronously.
  • Render-blocking JavaScript in the head: add defer or move scripts to the end of the body.
  • Web fonts delaying text rendering: add font-display: swap so a fallback font is shown immediately while the custom font loads.
  • Heavy hero image without prioritization: add fetchpriority="high" to the hero image and <link rel="preload"> for it in the head.

Best practices

  • Target sub-1.8 second FCP at the 75th percentile: Google's recommended threshold for a "good" experience.
  • Inline critical CSS: the styles needed for the first viewport should not require an extra network round trip.
  • Preload key resources: hero image, key fonts, and critical scripts benefit from explicit preload hints.
  • Defer non-critical work: analytics, chat widgets, and below-the-fold content can wait until after first paint.
Measures First Contentful Paint, the moment when the browser renders the first piece of visible content from the DOM, such as text, an image, or an SVG. FCP is the first signal to the user that the page is actually loading, and faster values are strongly correlated with lower bounce rates and better Core Web Vitals scores.
Largest Contentful Paint Test
77% of top 100 sites passed
The Largest Contentful Paint duration of this webpage is 3.44 seconds. To provide a good user experience, Google recommends that sites should strive to have Largest Contentful Paint of 2.5 seconds or less.
3.44 s
2.5 s
4 s
Largest Contentful Paint element within the viewport:
<div class="module module-master_slider module-master_slider-2..." style="background-image:url('https://www.servexpert.ro/im...">

Largest Contentful Paint Test

How to pass this test?

Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) measures when the largest visible element in the viewport, such as a hero image or main heading, finishes rendering. LCP is one of Google's Core Web Vitals and a direct ranking factor, used as a proxy for when the user perceives the page as effectively loaded. Fixing this issue means identifying the LCP element and ensuring it loads as early as possible.

Where to make the change

  • Identify the LCP element: open Chrome DevTools, run a Performance trace, and find the LCP marker. The element it points at is the one to optimize.
  • Application code or templates: preload the LCP image, give it fetchpriority="high", and ensure it is in the initial HTML rather than injected by JavaScript.
  • Server and CDN: reduce TTFB and ensure the LCP image is served from a fast, geographically close origin.

Common causes and how to resolve them

  • Hero image loaded lazily: remove loading="lazy" from the LCP image; it should load eagerly.
  • LCP image not preloaded: add <link rel="preload" as="image" href="/hero.jpg" fetchpriority="high"> in the head so the browser fetches it before parsing the rest of the document.
  • LCP image too large or in legacy format: resize to displayed dimensions and serve as WebP or AVIF.
  • Slow TTFB or render-blocking resources: address the underlying TTFB and render-blocking issues; LCP cannot be fast if the page itself is slow to start.
  • Client-side rendered hero content: server-render or pre-render the LCP element so it appears in the initial HTML.
  • Web fonts delaying LCP text: use font-display: swap so the LCP heading renders immediately in a fallback font.

Best practices

  • Target sub-2.5 second LCP at the 75th percentile: the official Core Web Vitals threshold for a "good" experience.
  • Preload the LCP image: the single highest-impact LCP optimization on most sites.
  • Use fetchpriority="high": tells the browser to prioritize the resource ahead of others.
  • Ship modern image formats: AVIF and WebP cut hero image bytes substantially, which directly lowers LCP.
Measures Largest Contentful Paint, the time at which the largest visible element in the viewport, such as a hero image or main heading, finishes rendering. LCP is one of Google's Core Web Vitals and a direct ranking factor, used as a proxy for when the user perceives the page as effectively loaded.
Cumulative Layout Shift Test
91% of top 100 sites passed
The CLS score of this webpage is 0.0000. To provide a good user experience, Google recommends that sites should strive to have a CLS score of 0.1 or less.
0
0.1
0.25
Measures Cumulative Layout Shift, the total amount that visible elements move around unexpectedly while the page loads. Layout shifts cause users to misclick and feel the page is unstable, and CLS is one of Google's Core Web Vitals and a direct ranking factor. Common causes include images without explicit dimensions, late-loading fonts, and aggressively injected overlays such as cookie consent banners.

Server and security

Score:84
Failed:3
Warnings:0
Passed:4
URL Canonicalization Test
93% of top 100 sites passed
Detects whether different URL variants of the site, such as the apex domain and the www subdomain or HTTP and HTTPS, all resolve consistently to a single canonical version. When the same content is reachable at multiple URLs without proper redirects, search engines may split ranking signals across the variants and become unsure which one to index.
SSL Checker and HTTPS Test
100% of top 100 sites passed
This website is successfully using HTTPS, a secure communication protocol over the Internet.
The certificate is not used before the activation date.
The certificate has not expired.
The hostname "www.servexpert.ro" is correctly listed in the certificate.
The certificate should be trusted by all major web browsers.
The certificate was not revoked.
The certificate was signed with a secure hash.
Certificate Chain:
Server certificate
Common Name
servexpert.ro
Subject Alternative Names
servexpert.ro, *.servexpert.ro
Not Valid Before
Tue, September 1, 2026 at 4:56:54 PM UTC
Not Valid After
Mon, November 30, 2026 at 5:56:51 PM UTC
Signature Algorithm
ecdsaWithSha256
Issuer
WE1
Root certificate
Common Name
WE1
Organization
Google Trust Services
Location
US
Not Valid Before
Wed, December 13, 2023 at 9:00:00 AM UTC
Not Valid After
Tue, February 20, 2029 at 2:00:00 PM UTC
Signature Algorithm
ecdsaWithSha384
Issuer
GTS Root R4
Verifies whether the site is served over HTTPS with a valid TLS certificate. HTTPS encrypts the connection between visitor and server, protecting credentials and other sensitive data in transit, and Google has used it as a positive ranking signal since 2014. Modern browsers also flag non-HTTPS pages as Not Secure, which damages user trust.
Mixed Content Test (HTTP over HTTPS)
100% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage does not use mixed content - both the initial HTML and all other resources are loaded over HTTPS.
Detects whether a page served over HTTPS is loading any sub-resources such as images, scripts, or stylesheets over insecure HTTP. Mixed content weakens the security guarantees of HTTPS, and modern browsers either block the resources outright or warn the user, often breaking the page in the process.
HTTP2 Test
99% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is using the HTTP/2 protocol.
Verifies whether the page and its resources are delivered over HTTP/2 or newer, rather than the legacy HTTP/1.1 protocol. HTTP/2 introduces multiplexing, header compression, and prioritization, which together reduce latency and allow the browser to load many resources from the same origin far more efficiently.
HSTS Test
84% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is not using the Strict-Transport-Security header! This is a security header that was created as a way to force the browser to use secure connections when a site is running over HTTPS.

HSTS Test

How to pass this test?

The Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS) response header tells browsers to access the site only over HTTPS, automatically upgrading future requests and refusing to fall back to HTTP. Fixing this issue means configuring the server to send the header on every HTTPS response.

Example

Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload

Where to make the change

  • Server configuration: add the header in Nginx (add_header Strict-Transport-Security "max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains" always;), Apache (Header always set Strict-Transport-Security ...), or your application's response middleware.
  • CDN: Cloudflare, Fastly, and CloudFront let you set HSTS at the edge so it applies regardless of origin configuration.
  • Cloud platforms: Netlify and Vercel allow HSTS via headers files (_headers on Netlify, vercel.json on Vercel).

Common causes and how to resolve them

  • Header not sent: add it in the server or CDN config. Confirm in DevTools, Network tab.
  • Header sent only on HTTP responses: HSTS is only honored over HTTPS, so the header must accompany the HTTPS response.
  • Short max-age: a max-age below a few months provides little protection. Bump to a year (31536000) once you are confident HTTPS is stable.
  • includeSubDomains breaking subdomains that lack HTTPS: only add this directive after every subdomain serves HTTPS. Otherwise users will lose access to the HTTP-only ones.

Best practices

  • Start with a short max-age, then ramp up: a one-week max-age lets you back out quickly if something breaks. Increase to a year once stable.
  • Add preload after testing: submit your domain to hstspreload.org so browsers ship with HSTS for your site baked in. Note that removing a preloaded site is slow.
  • Pair with HTTP-to-HTTPS redirects: HSTS only kicks in after a successful HTTPS visit. Until then, redirects do the work.
Checks whether the server sends a Strict-Transport-Security header instructing browsers to only access the site over HTTPS. HSTS protects users from protocol downgrade attacks and accidental exposure to insecure connections, and is a baseline requirement for any site handling sensitive data.
Plaintext Emails Test
97% of top 100 sites passed
We've found 1 email addresses in your page code! We advise you to protect email links in a way that hides them from the spam harvesters.

Plaintext Emails Test

How to pass this test?

This test fails when the page exposes one or more email addresses in plain text. Spam-harvesting bots scrape pages for plaintext addresses and add them to bulk mailing lists. Fixing this issue means obfuscating contact addresses, using a contact form, or rendering them via JavaScript so simple scrapers cannot read them.

Where to make the change

  • Application code or templates: replace plain contact@example.com text with one of the obfuscation techniques below.
  • WordPress: a contact form plugin handles email submissions without exposing the address. Some SEO and security plugins also offer email obfuscation.
  • Shopify, Wix, Squarespace: use the platform's built-in contact form blocks rather than displaying the email address directly.

Common causes and how to resolve them

  • Plain text address in a paragraph or footer: replace with a contact form, an obfuscated rendering (HTML entities, CSS reversal), or a JavaScript-built mailto link.
  • Mailto link with the address visible: the visible text is what bots read. Make the visible text a label like "Email us" while the href still works.
  • Address baked into images is fine for SEO but bad for accessibility: screen readers cannot read it. Pair an image with a contact form instead.

Best practices

  • Prefer contact forms: they reduce spam and make analytics easier.
  • Use HTML entity encoding: writing &#99;&#111;... for the address defeats the simplest scrapers, though sophisticated ones decode it.
  • Render via JavaScript: building the mailto link client-side blocks scrapers that only read static HTML.
  • Consider a Cloudflare-style email obfuscation: some CDNs automatically rewrite plaintext emails to obfuscated equivalents.
Scans the page for email addresses written in plain text. Spambots harvest such addresses to add them to bulk mailing lists, so obfuscating contact emails or replacing them with contact forms helps reduce inbox spam without hiding the address from legitimate visitors.

Mobile usability

Score:100
Failed:0
Warnings:0
Passed:3
Meta Viewport Test
92% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is using a viewport meta tag.
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0" />
Checks whether the page declares a viewport meta tag that controls how the layout scales on mobile devices. Without it, mobile browsers render the page at a default desktop width and shrink it to fit, producing unreadable text and unusable touch targets. A correct viewport declaration is the foundation of responsive design.
Media Query Responsive Test
98% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is using CSS media queries, which is the base for responsive design functionalities.
Detects whether the page's stylesheets use CSS media queries to adapt the layout to different screen sizes. Media queries are the primary mechanism for responsive design, allowing typography, spacing, and component arrangement to adjust gracefully from phones to large desktops. Because Google now indexes the web mobile-first, the responsive mobile layout is effectively the version search engines crawl, evaluate, and rank.
Mobile Snapshot Test
Mobile view
A rendered screenshot of how the page appears on a mobile device. Useful for visually confirming that responsive layouts work as intended and for spotting issues such as overflowing content, illegible text, or broken images that automated checks alone may miss.

Advanced SEO

Score:98
Failed:1
Warnings:1
Passed:7
Structured Data Test
66% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is using structured data.
Inspects the page for structured data markup such as JSON-LD or Microdata that follows schema.org vocabularies. Structured data helps search engines understand entities and relationships on the page, often unlocking rich result features in SERPs such as star ratings, FAQs, recipes, and product cards. It is also a primary signal AI answer engines use to extract precise facts when generating responses.
Custom 404 Error Page Test
80% of top 100 sites passed
This website is using a custom 404 error page. We recommend to have a custom 404 error page in order to improve the website's user experience by letting users know that only a specific page is missing/broken (and not the entire site), providing them helpful links, the opportunity to report bugs, and potentially track the source of broken links.
Detects whether the site serves a branded, helpful page when a requested URL is not found, instead of the browser's generic error screen. A custom 404 keeps users on the site by offering navigation, search, or suggested links, which reduces frustration and protects engagement metrics that influence both UX perception and indirect SEO outcomes.
Noindex Tag Test
99% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage does not use the noindex meta tag. This means that it can be indexed by search engines.
Detects whether the page is being excluded from search engine indexes via a noindex directive in the robots meta tag or X-Robots-Tag HTTP header. A noindex on the wrong page is one of the most common ways important content silently disappears from search results, so verifying its absence on pages meant to rank is critical.
Canonical Tag Test
93% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is using the canonical link tag. This tag specifies that the URL: https://www.servexpert.ro/ is preferred to be used in search results. Please ensure that this specification is correct, as canonical tags are often hard-coded and may not always reflect the latest changes in a site's URL structure.
<link href="https://www.servexpert.ro" rel="canonical"/>
Detects whether the page declares a canonical link tag indicating its preferred URL. Canonical tags consolidate ranking signals across duplicate or near-duplicate URLs onto a single authoritative version, which prevents search engines from splitting authority across variants caused by query parameters, session IDs, or alternate paths. They also help AI crawlers identify the source of truth when citing the page.
Nofollow Tag Test
This webpage is using the nofollow meta tag! We recommend to use this tag carefully since search engines will not crawl all links from this webpage.

Nofollow Tag Test

How to pass this test?

This test reports on whether the page applies a nofollow directive that tells search engines not to follow outbound links. The nofollow attribute (and the related sponsored and ugc values) controls how link equity flows from your page. Fixing this issue means using the right rel value on each external link based on its purpose so signals are passed only where you intend.

Where to make the change

  • Raw HTML: add rel="nofollow", rel="sponsored", or rel="ugc" to specific outbound links rather than blanket-applying them site-wide.
  • WordPress: the block editor offers a "mark as nofollow" option per link, and SEO plugins can auto-tag external links by domain.
  • Shopify, Wix, Squarespace: editor-generated links allow rel attribute toggles; manual HTML embeds need them set explicitly.
  • Headless or framework sites: wrap external links in a component that decides the rel based on the link's classification.

Common causes and how to resolve them

  • Site-wide nofollow on every external link: overly aggressive. Reserve nofollow for sponsored, untrusted, or user-generated content.
  • Sponsored content not labeled: use rel="sponsored" on paid placements and affiliate links to comply with Google's link spam policy.
  • User-generated content unmarked: comments, forum posts, and review user submissions should use rel="ugc".
  • Trusted editorial links nofollowed: these should pass equity. Remove the nofollow.

Best practices

  • Use the most specific value: sponsored for paid links, ugc for user content, nofollow for everything else you want to disclaim. They can be combined: rel="sponsored noopener".
  • Do not nofollow internal links: "PageRank sculpting" with internal nofollow no longer works and just wastes crawl signal.
  • Audit periodically: as content ages, sponsored relationships change. Review affiliate and partner links once a year.
Detects whether the page applies a nofollow directive, either through a robots meta tag, an X-Robots-Tag header, or per-link rel attributes, that tells search engines not to follow outbound links. Google recommends nofollow for sponsored links and for user-generated content where the linked sites are not vetted, so its presence or absence has real consequences for how link equity flows.
Disallow Directive Test
Your robots.txt file includes a disallow command which instructs search engines to avoid certain parts of your website! You are advised to confirm if access to these resources or pages are intended to be blocked (e.g., if they contain internal-only content or sensitive information).
Surfaces the disallow rules declared in the site's robots.txt file. Disallow directives tell search engine crawlers not to access specific files, paths, or directories, which is useful for keeping admin sections and duplicate content out of indexes but dangerous when applied too broadly, since over-blocking can hide important pages from search.
Meta Refresh Test
98% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is not using a meta refresh tag.
Detects whether the page uses a meta refresh tag to automatically reload or redirect after a delay. Meta refresh is largely obsolete, hurts accessibility by jumping focus and disorienting screen reader users, and is a weaker signal to search engines than a proper server-side 301 redirect. Its presence usually indicates outdated implementation worth updating.
SPF Records Test
94% of top 100 sites passed
This DNS server is using an SPF record.
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:188.34.154.192 +ip4:188.212.127.103 ~all
Checks the domain's DNS for a Sender Policy Framework record. SPF lets receiving mail servers verify that messages claiming to come from the domain were actually sent by an authorized mail server, which significantly reduces the chance of legitimate email being marked as spam and protects the domain's sender reputation.
Ads.txt Validation Test
67% of top 100 sites passed
This website doesn't use an ads.txt file! Ads.txt is a text file that contains a list of Authorized Digital Sellers. The purpose of ads.txt files is to give advertisers and advertising networks the ability to verify who is allowed to sell advertising on your website.
Validates the format of the site's ads.txt file, which publishers use to declare which advertising vendors are authorized to sell their inventory programmatically. A correctly formatted ads.txt protects against domain spoofing in the ad supply chain and is required for inclusion in many premium advertising marketplaces.

Dominate search today on Google and AI Engines.

Join 85,000+ SaaS Marketers, Growth Agencies, Content-Led Companies and E-commerce Brands.

See Pricing
Dashboard preview showing SEO site checkup metrics, page group insights, and issue prioritization