Skip to main content
Archived

SEO Report for https://keywordtool.io

Your general SEO Checkup Score


SEO Score72/100
Average SEO score of top 100 sites: 75%This value indicates the average SEO score of the top 100 most visited websites in the US (in the past 12 months)
AI Visibility81/100
AI visibility score reflects brand reach in AI

Your site scored 72/100, below the 75 average for top sites. We found 12 issues to fix, and clearing them is how you move up. And an AI Visibility Score of 81/100 means ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity consistently surface your brand, a real edge as search keeps shifting toward AI.

12 Failed
4 Warnings
47 Passed

Want to fix these issues and track your progress?

Issues to fix

HIGH
To improve the website experience for your visitors, it is recommended to eliminate any render-blocking resources on this webpage.
Details
HIGH
Users may abandon pages that take longer than 5 seconds to load, resulting in a potential loss of up to 50% of visitors. Faster loading pages can lead to increased traffic, better conversions, and higher sales.
Details
HIGH
Add a sitemap file to help search engine crawlers index content more thoroughly and quickly.
Details
HIGH
Using images in a modern format can significantly reduce the file size and improve the loading speed of a webpage, providing a better user experience and potentially increasing engagement.
Details
MEDIUM
Serve properly sized images to reduce page loading times and to improve user's experience.
Details
MEDIUM
Avoid using distorted images, as they can have a negative impact on the user experience.
Details
MEDIUM
Reducing the JavaScript execution time can result in faster page load times and a smoother user experience, as it allows the browser to render and display the page more quickly.
Details
MEDIUM
Consider adding cache headers for JavaScript resources to speed up the webpage for returning users.
Details
MEDIUM
Consider adding cache headers for images to improve website performance. With cache headers, browsers can cache images and serve them quickly to returning visitors, rather than re-fetching them each time.
Details
MEDIUM
Consider adding cache headers for CSS resources to speed up the webpage for returning users.
Details
LOW
Using more than 20 HTTP requests on a webpage can negatively impact the loading time.
Details

AI Insights

Score:0
Failed:0
Warnings:0
Passed:5
Domain Business Context
Understanding the business context of a domain can help you create content that is more relevant to your target audience and differentiate your website from competitors.

What is this domain about

A multi-platform keyword research and autocomplete-based SEO tool for discovering long-tail search terms, search volume data, and content ideas.

Industry Niche

SEO Keyword Research Software

Target Audience

SEO professionals, marketers, content creators, advertisers, and businesses researching search intent and keyword opportunities.

This test will check the business context of the domain associated with the analyzed webpage. The business context includes the domain's description, target audience and industry niche (if applicable). Understanding the business context of a domain can help you create content that is more relevant to your target audience and differentiate your website from competitors.
LLM Visibility Checker
LLM Visibility Checker

Track your brand across ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude

Get an AI Presence Score, see which of your pages get cited, and follow how you compare with competitors over time.

How visible your brand is to AI engines
Content Strengths and Weaknesses

This webpage is comprehensive and persuasive, with strong product explanation, broad platform coverage, and multiple trust signals. Its main weaknesses are heavy promotional repetition and limited evidence of independent methodology or detailed product documentation on the page itself.

Content Strengths

  • Clear Product Positioning
  • Broad Platform Coverage
  • Strong Social Proof

Content Weaknesses

  • Repetitive Sales Copy
  • Limited Methodology Detail
  • Sparse Author Transparency
This test will analyze the content of the webpage to identify its strengths and weaknesses. The analysis includes factors such as keyword usage, readability, originality, and relevance to the target audience. By understanding the strengths and weaknesses of your content, you can make informed decisions about how to improve it and better meet the needs of your audience.
Content Trust
77%
Topical Relevance98%
Subject Expertise84%
Credibility66%

This webpage appears moderately trustworthy because it includes clear product information, named testimonials, company addresses, and policy links. Credibility is helped by press mentions and third-party ratings, but the page still lacks a visible methodology page, author attribution, and deeper evidence for some performance claims.

This test will evaluate the trustworthiness of the content on the webpage. It assesses factors such as the credibility of sources, accuracy of information, and overall reliability. A high level of content trust can enhance your website's reputation and improve its ranking in search engine results.
Visual SEO Analysis
Visual SEO Analysis

Find out if your page design converts the visitors you earn

We score six things that decide whether a visitor stays and acts, from the first screen to the path to action, and rank every fix by effort and impact.

How your page's design and UX affect conversions
Content Freshness
92%

The page feels current and actively maintained, with 2026 copyright text, modern platform references like Perplexity and TikTok, and current workflow mentions such as MCP and AI assistants. There are no strong signs of stale core content, and the page’s topic aligns with an actively evolving search and SEO landscape.

Positive Signals

  • 2026 copyright notice
  • Current AI workflow mentions
  • Modern platform coverage
This test will check the freshness of the content on the webpage. It evaluates how recently the content was created or updated, and whether it remains relevant to current trends and user interests. Fresh content can attract more visitors and improve your website's ranking in search engine results.
Content Opportunities

The page already covers the core product well, but it could become more authoritative by adding proof, depth, and practical guidance. The biggest opportunities are around methodology transparency, richer use cases, and more actionable educational content for different audience segments.

Quick Wins

  • •Add a short methodology FAQ explaining where keyword suggestions and search volume data come from.
  • •Turn one existing testimonial into a mini case study with a measurable outcome and use case.
  • •Create a comparison table that contrasts the tool with Google Keyword Planner and one other major keyword tool.
This test will identify potential content opportunities for the webpage. It analyzes the current content landscape, identifies gaps in coverage, and suggests topics or keywords that could be targeted to attract more visitors and improve search engine rankings.

Common SEO issues

Score:70
Failed:3
Warnings:3
Passed:13
Meta Title Test
100% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is using a title tag.
Text: Keyword (Research) Tool ⚠️ Plan Google Keywords【FREE】
Length: 53 characters
The meta title is an HTML element that defines a page's title, displayed in search engine results, browser tabs, and bookmark lists. A concise, keyword-relevant title is a strong on-page ranking signal and a major driver of organic click-through rate. AI answer engines and LLM-driven search experiences also rely on the title to identify, summarize, and cite the page in generative results.
Meta Description Test
92% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is using a meta description tag.
Text: Keyword Tool ᐈ keyword research tool & Google Keyword Planner alternative with FREE MCP server for AI agents ✅ SEO & PPC keywords across 16+ platforms
Length: 150 characters
The meta description is an HTML tag that provides a short summary of a page's content, often shown beneath the title in search results. While not a direct ranking factor, an accurate and inviting description significantly improves click-through rate from organic listings. AI answer engines and social platforms also use it as a trusted summary when generating previews, citations and shareable snippets.
Google Search Results Preview Test
Desktop version
https://keywordtool.io/Keyword (Research) Tool ⚠️ Plan Google Keywords【FREE】Keyword Tool ᐈ keyword research tool & Google Keyword Planner alternative with FREE MCP server for AI agents ✅ SEO & PPC keywords across 16+ platforms
Mobile version
https://keywordtool.io/Keyword (Research) Tool ⚠️ Plan Google Keywords【FREE】Keyword Tool ᐈ keyword research tool & Google Keyword Planner alternative with FREE MCP server for AI agents ✅ SEO & PPC keywords across 16+ platforms
A simulated preview of how the page may appear in Google search results, combining the title, URL, and meta description as Google typically renders them. Useful for spotting truncated text, weak phrasing, or missing elements before publishing, since the snippet directly influences whether searchers click through.
Social Media Meta Tags Test
89% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is using social media meta tags.
Open Graph Meta Tags
og:titleKeyword (Research) Tool ⚠️ Plan Google Keywords【FREE】
og:descriptionKeyword Tool ᐈ keyword research tool & Google Keyword Planner alternative with FREE MCP server for AI agents ✅ SEO & PPC keywords across 16+ platforms
og:imagehttps://keywordtool.io/images/meta/og-keyword-tool.png
og:urlhttps://keywordtool.io
og:site_nameKeyword Tool
Twitter Card Meta Tags
twitter:titleKeyword (Research) Tool ⚠️ Plan Google Keywords【FREE】
twitter:descriptionKeyword Tool ᐈ keyword research tool & Google Keyword Planner alternative with FREE MCP server for AI agents ✅ SEO & PPC keywords across 16+ platforms
twitter:creator@keywordtoolio
twitter:imagehttps://keywordtool.io/images/meta/twittercard-keyword-tool.png
twitter:image:altKeyword (Research) Tool ⚠️ Plan Google Keywords【FREE】
twitter:site@keywordtoolio
twitter:cardsummary_large_image
twitter:widgets:cspon
Open Graph and Twitter Card meta tags tell social platforms and link unfurlers how to display a page when its URL is shared. Well-formed tags produce richer previews with the intended title, description, and image, which improves click-through on social channels. They also serve as a structured signal that AI crawlers and answer engines can use when summarizing the page.
Most Common Keywords Test
There is likely no optimal keyword density (search engine algorithms have evolved beyond keyword density metrics as a significant ranking factor). It can be useful, however, to note which keywords appear most often on your page and if they reflect the intended topic of your page. More importantly, the keywords on your page should appear within natural sounding and grammatically correct copy.
139keyword
91tool
70google
52search
49keywords
A frequency analysis of the most repeated words and phrases in the page's visible content. Useful for getting a quick sense of which topics search engines are likely to associate with the page, and for spotting cases where the actual content drifts from the intended subject.
Keywords Usage Test
48% of top 100 sites passed
The most common keywords of this webpage are distributed well across the important HTML tags. This helps search engines to properly identify the topic of this webpage.
Keyword
Title tag
Meta description
Headings
keyword
tool
google
search
keywords
Cross-checks whether the most frequently used keywords on the page also appear in the title and meta description. Alignment between body content and metadata helps search engines confirm the page's topic and reinforces relevance for those terms.
Keywords Cloud Test
account
advertising
alternative
amazon
audience
autocomplete
based
best
bing
business
chinese
claude
click
competition
complete
contact
content
cost
countries
country
create
creating
different
does
earbuds
ebay
engines
english
etsy
free
generate
global
google
great
hashtags
have
help
helps
hundreds
information
instagram
intent
keyword
keywords
keywordtool
language
languages
like
long
looking
make
marketing
monthly
naver
online
opportunities
people
perplexity
pinterest
planner
platform
platforms
play
popular
predictions
products
provides
quickly
reddit
related
relevant
research
right
search
searches
searching
shows
start
store
suggestions
supported
supports
tail
terms
thousands
tiktok
time
tool
tools
topic
trends
type
used
useful
using
version
volume
website
wireless
youtube
A visual word cloud of the page's content, with more frequent terms shown in larger text. Provides a quick at-a-glance view of which words dominate the page, helping confirm that the visible content reflects the intended topic.
Competitor Domains Test
Competitor Domains

Understand your competitors' SEO and backlink profile

Get related competitors and their domain authority score in relation to your domain.

Identifies up to ten domains that compete for similar organic search results, ranked by overall domain authority based on the volume and quality of their backlink profiles. Useful for benchmarking the competitive landscape and prioritizing which sites to study for content and link-building strategy.
Heading Tags Test
62% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage contains too many H2 tags! H2 tags should re-inforce the related content of your page to search engines - too many tags may make the topic less clear, or look like spam tactics. Consider using less than 10 H2 tags.
H1 tags
Research Keywords Using Google Autocomplete
H2 tags
As Seen In
The Best Alternative To Google Keyword Planner
See What Over 1 Million Marketers Already Know
How Does Keyword Tool Work?
Why Is Keyword Tool One Of The Best Free Keyword Research Tools?
Find The Keywords Hidden In Google Keyword Planner
Keyword Tool For SEO And Content Creation
Keyword Tool For International SEO
Keyword Tool For Advertising
Keyword Research Beyond Google
Keyword Tool Pro - Search Volume, Trends And More
Enlarged image preview
Inspects the page for H1 and H2 heading tags and reports their structure. Headings give both users and search engines a clear outline of the page's topics, with the H1 acting as the primary subject and H2s framing major sections. A clean heading hierarchy also helps AI answer engines segment the content into discrete passages they can quote or summarize.
Robots.txt Test
99% of top 100 sites passed
This website is using a robots.txt file.
Verifies whether the site exposes a robots.txt file at the root domain. This file is the first resource most crawlers request, telling search engines and other bots which paths they may or may not access. It is also the standard mechanism for allowing or blocking modern AI crawlers used by training pipelines and answer engines.
Sitemap Test
83% of top 100 sites passed
This website lacks a sitemap file! Sitemaps can help robots index your content more thoroughly and quickly. Read more on Google's guidelines for implementing the sitemap protocol.

Sitemap Test

How to pass this test?

An XML sitemap gives search engines and AI crawlers an explicit, machine-readable list of the URLs you want indexed, along with metadata such as last-modified dates. Fixing this issue means generating a valid sitemap, publishing it at a stable URL, and pointing crawlers to it via robots.txt and Search Console. This is especially important for large sites, sites with weak internal linking, or sites where new content needs to be discovered quickly.

Example

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9">
  <url>
    <loc>https://example.com/</loc>
    <lastmod>2026-04-15</lastmod>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://example.com/blog/getting-started</loc>
    <lastmod>2026-03-22</lastmod>
  </url>
</urlset>

Where to make the change

  • Raw HTML or static site: generate the XML at build time and publish it at /sitemap.xml. Many static-site generators have a built-in sitemap option.
  • WordPress: a dedicated SEO plugin will generate and update the sitemap automatically, typically at /sitemap_index.xml.
  • Shopify: Shopify generates /sitemap.xml automatically and updates it as products and collections change.
  • Wix or Squarespace: both platforms generate the sitemap automatically and serve it at the standard root path.
  • Headless or framework sites: use the framework's built-in sitemap module (for example next-sitemap for Next.js or the @astrojs/sitemap integration) so the file is regenerated on every build.

Common causes and how to resolve them

  • No sitemap published: generate one and publish it at the site root. Reference it from robots.txt with a Sitemap: line.
  • Sitemap lists URLs that 404 or redirect: stale entries waste crawl budget and trigger Search Console warnings. Regenerate the sitemap from current published URLs only.
  • Mixed canonical and non-canonical URLs: the sitemap should list canonical URLs only. Listing both http and https, or trailing-slash variants, splits crawl signals.
  • Sitemap exceeds size limits: a single sitemap may contain at most 50,000 URLs and 50 MB uncompressed. Split larger sites into multiple sitemaps and reference them from a sitemap index file.

Best practices

  • Submit to Search Console: add the sitemap URL in Google Search Console (and Bing Webmaster Tools) so the platform tracks coverage and surfaces errors.
  • Keep lastmod accurate: Google uses lastmod as a hint when prioritizing crawls. Update it whenever the page content meaningfully changes; do not bump it on every build.
  • Exclude noindex and disallowed URLs: the sitemap should describe what you want indexed. Listing pages that are blocked from crawling sends mixed signals.
  • Use sitemap index files for multi-sitemap setups: a sitemap index aggregates child sitemaps (for example one per content type) and is the single URL you submit to search engines.
Looks for an XML sitemap on the site and reports whether one is published. Sitemaps give search engines an explicit, machine-readable list of the URLs you want crawled, along with metadata such as last-modified dates, which speeds up discovery of new and updated pages. They are especially useful for large sites or those with weak internal linking.
Image Alt Test
78% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is using "img" tags with empty or missing "alt" attribute!

Image Alt Test

How to pass this test?

Alt attributes provide a text alternative for images, used by screen readers when a user cannot see the image and by search engines and multimodal AI models to understand what the image depicts. Fixing this issue means writing concise, descriptive alt text for every meaningful image on the page, and using empty alt for purely decorative images so assistive technology can skip them. The same alt text helps multimodal LLMs and image search tools surface and cite your visuals.

Example

<img src="/images/marathon-shoes.jpg"
     alt="Side view of a lightweight neon-green marathon running shoe">

<img src="/images/divider.svg" alt="">

Where to make the change

  • Raw HTML: add the alt attribute to every <img> tag. For decorative images, use alt="" so screen readers skip them.
  • WordPress: the media library has an Alt text field on every uploaded image. Fill it once and the value is reused everywhere the image is inserted.
  • Shopify: in the product or page editor, click an image and use the Edit alt text option. Theme code that renders product images should pull image.alt.
  • Wix or Squarespace: click the image in the editor and use the Alt text or Image description field in the side panel.
  • Headless or framework sites: require an alt prop on every image component and lint for missing values during build.

Common causes and how to resolve them

  • Attribute missing: add alt="" at minimum so the page validates. Replace with descriptive text on any image that conveys information.
  • Alt text is the filename: "IMG_4837.jpg" tells the user nothing. Replace with a description of what is in the image.
  • Alt text duplicates the visible caption: screen readers will read both, doubling the user's listening time. Differentiate the alt from the caption or empty the alt.
  • Decorative images get descriptive alt text: background patterns and dividers should use alt="", otherwise screen readers narrate noise.
  • Bulk imports left alt blank: a one-off audit of the media library or a CMS-side script can fill missing alt values from product names, captions, or asset descriptions.

Best practices

  • Describe the function, not just the appearance: for a chart, describe what the chart shows. For a button image, describe what the button does.
  • Keep it concise: aim for under 125 characters. Screen readers do not pause mid-sentence, so long alt text is exhausting to listen to.
  • Skip "image of" or "picture of": the screen reader already announces it as an image.
  • Include the focus keyword when natural: alt text is a minor on-page signal, but stuffing keywords in unnatural alt text harms both accessibility and ranking.
Inspects whether images on the page include descriptive alt attributes. Alt text provides accessibility for screen readers, a fallback when images fail to load, and a textual signal that helps search engines understand image content. It also improves how AI crawlers and image search tools interpret and surface the visuals.
Responsive Image Test
29% of top 100 sites passed
Not all images in this webpage are properly sized! This webpage is serving images that are larger than needed for the size of the user's viewport.

Responsive Image Test

How to pass this test?

This test fails when one or more images on the page are served at dimensions significantly larger than the size at which the browser actually renders them. Fixing this issue means resizing the source files (or serving responsive variants) so the bytes downloaded match the pixels actually displayed. The result is faster page loads, lower data usage, and better Core Web Vitals scores.

Example

<img
  src="/images/hero-800.jpg"
  srcset="/images/hero-400.jpg 400w,
          /images/hero-800.jpg 800w,
          /images/hero-1600.jpg 1600w"
  sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 800px"
  alt="Marathon runners at sunrise"
  width="800" height="450">

Where to make the change

  • Raw HTML: use srcset and sizes to let the browser pick the right variant for the user's viewport. Always include intrinsic width and height attributes.
  • WordPress: WordPress generates multiple image sizes automatically. Use the the_post_thumbnail() helper or the block editor's image block, both of which emit responsive srcset markup.
  • Shopify: use the image_url Liquid filter with size parameters (for example {{ image | image_url: width: 800 }}) and pair with image_tag to emit a responsive image.
  • Wix or Squarespace: both platforms generate responsive variants automatically; this issue is typically caused by uploading a deliberately oversized image.
  • Headless or framework sites: use the framework's image component (for example next/image or astro:assets), which generates responsive variants and lazy-loads off-screen images.

Common causes and how to resolve them

  • Original camera or stock-photo file uploaded as-is: a 6000-pixel-wide JPEG rendered in a 400-pixel column wastes most of the bytes. Resize the source or generate responsive variants.
  • No srcset: the browser has no choice but to use the single source. Add multiple variants so mobile users get smaller files.
  • Hero images sized for ultra-wide displays: if your largest layout is 1600 pixels, do not ship a 4000-pixel original.
  • Background images set in CSS without responsive sources: use the image-set() CSS function or media queries to swap in different image files at different breakpoints.

Best practices

  • Generate variants at common widths: 400, 800, 1200, and 1600 pixels covers most viewports cleanly.
  • Always set width and height: intrinsic dimensions let the browser reserve space and avoid layout shift, helping CLS.
  • Lazy-load off-screen images: add loading="lazy" to images below the fold so the browser only downloads them when needed.
  • Pair with modern formats: resizing alone is good; resizing and serving WebP or AVIF compounds the savings.
Compares the natural dimensions of each image to the size at which it is actually rendered in the user's viewport. Serving images significantly larger than needed wastes bandwidth, slows page load, and forces the browser to scale assets unnecessarily, all of which hurt performance and user experience.
Image Aspect Ratio Test
75% of top 100 sites passed
Not all image display dimensions match the natural aspect ratio! Fix aspect ratio issues to avoid distorted images on this website!

Image Aspect Ratio Test

How to pass this test?

This test fails when one or more images are rendered at an aspect ratio meaningfully different from the source file's native ratio, producing stretched or squashed visuals. Fixing this issue means either using width and height attributes that match the file's real dimensions or replacing the source with a correctly proportioned crop.

Example

<!-- Source file is 1600 x 900 (16:9). Set matching attributes: -->
<img src="/images/marathon-1600.jpg"
     alt="Marathon runners at sunrise"
     width="1600" height="900"
     style="max-width: 100%; height: auto;">

Where to make the change

  • Raw HTML and CSS: set the width and height attributes to the source file's native dimensions. Use CSS height: auto when scaling responsively so the browser preserves the ratio.
  • WordPress: when inserting an image via the block editor, choose the image's intended size rather than overriding dimensions in custom CSS.
  • Shopify, Wix, or Squarespace: use the platform's built-in image cropper so the displayed crop matches the source file you upload.
  • Headless or framework sites: components like next/image require both width and height, which prevents distortion when the layout scales.

Common causes and how to resolve them

  • Hard-coded width and height that do not match the file: recompute them from the source dimensions or remove them and rely on the file's intrinsic ratio.
  • Container has a fixed height that crops the image: use CSS object-fit: cover if cropping is intentional, or change the container so the image keeps its natural ratio.
  • Wrong source file uploaded: swap in a correctly proportioned crop rather than stretching the wrong file in CSS.

Best practices

  • Always set both width and height: the browser uses these to reserve space and avoid layout shift before the image loads, which helps CLS.
  • Use object-fit when cropping is intentional: cover fills the container without distortion; contain letterboxes to preserve the full image.
  • Standardize on a few aspect ratios: picking one or two ratios per template makes it easier to crop assets consistently and avoid one-off distortions.
Compares each image's natural aspect ratio against the ratio at which it is displayed on the page. Significant mismatches result in stretched or squashed visuals that look unprofessional and degrade the user experience.
Deprecated HTML Tags Test
94% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage does not use HTML deprecated tags.
Scans the markup for HTML elements that are no longer part of the modern HTML specification. Deprecated tags may still render today, but browsers can drop support at any time, leading to broken layouts and rendering inconsistencies. Replacing them with current standards keeps the page resilient and easier to maintain.
Google Analytics Test
72% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is using Google Analytics.
Detects whether the page is instrumented with Google Analytics tracking code. Analytics is not an SEO ranking factor, but having reliable traffic and behavior data is essential for measuring the impact of SEO work and identifying opportunities for improvement.
Favicon Test
100% of top 100 sites passed
favicon
This website appears to have a favicon.
Verifies whether the site declares a favicon and that it loads correctly. Favicons appear in browser tabs, bookmarks, and increasingly in search engine result pages, where they reinforce brand recognition and make a listing easier to spot at a glance.
JS Error Test
83% of top 100 sites passed
There are no severe JavaScript errors on this webpage.
Inspects the page for JavaScript runtime errors that occur as it loads. Unhandled errors can break interactive features, leave content unrendered, and signal poor code quality, all of which hurt the user experience that search engines factor into rankings.
Console Errors Test
27% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage has some warnings caught by the Chrome DevTools Console!

Console Errors Test

How to pass this test?

Console warnings are non-fatal messages the browser emits about deprecated APIs, security best-practice violations, performance hints, or potential bugs. They do not break the page today, but most warnings indicate something that will eventually become a hard error. Fixing this issue means triaging each warning, resolving the actionable ones, and adding monitoring so new warnings get caught early.

Where to make the change

  • Open DevTools, Console tab: filter the panel to Warnings only. Each entry includes a link to the source location and often documentation explaining the recommended replacement.
  • Application code: update the call site to use the modern API. Most browser deprecations include a recommended replacement in the warning text.
  • Third-party tags: contact the vendor or upgrade to the current loader script. Outdated tags are the most common source of deprecation warnings.

Common causes and how to resolve them

  • Deprecated DOM or Web APIs: swap the deprecated method for the modern equivalent. The MDN documentation linked in the warning describes the replacement.
  • Performance hints (forced reflow, large layout shifts, long tasks): investigate with the Performance tab. These warnings often map directly to Core Web Vitals failures.
  • Insecure features (Permissions-Policy, deprecated headers): update server response headers to use the current syntax.
  • Cookie warnings (SameSite, Secure): set explicit SameSite and Secure attributes on every cookie, especially those used in cross-site contexts.

Best practices

  • Resolve warnings before they become errors: deprecation cycles usually run six to twelve months. Fix early to avoid emergency patches when the API is removed.
  • Keep the console clean on production: a noisy console hides genuine new issues among the chronic ones.
  • Pin third-party scripts to maintained versions: outdated vendor scripts are the dominant source of long-running warnings.
Reviews the browser console for warnings and errors emitted while the page loads. Console messages often expose underlying issues such as failed network requests, deprecated APIs, or security warnings that can quietly degrade the experience even when the page appears to work.
Charset Declaration Test
96% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage has a character encoding declaration.
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Checks whether the page declares a character encoding such as UTF-8. Without an explicit charset declaration, browsers must guess the encoding, which can lead to garbled symbols, broken accented characters, and inconsistent rendering across devices. UTF-8 is the modern standard recommended by Google.

Speed optimizations

Score:56
Failed:8
Warnings:0
Passed:12
HTML Page Size Test
23% of top 100 sites passed
The size of this webpage's HTML is 30.04 Kb and is under the average webpage's HTML size of 33 Kb. Faster loading websites result in a better user experience, higher conversion rates, and generally better search engine rankings.
Measures the size of the raw HTML document, excluding images and external CSS or JavaScript. Bloated HTML increases time to first byte and parsing time, slowing down rendering on mobile networks and lower-powered devices. Trimming inline styles, redundant markup, and oversized inline data keeps initial load fast.
DOM Size Test
56% of top 100 sites passed
The Document Object Model (DOM) of this webpage has 1,057 nodes which is less than the recommended value of 1,500 nodes.
Measures the size and depth of the page's Document Object Model, the tree of nodes the browser builds from the HTML. Very large DOMs increase memory usage, lengthen style and layout calculations, and slow down rendering, particularly on mobile devices. Keeping the DOM lean improves both load time and runtime responsiveness.
HTML Compression/GZIP Test
99% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is successfully compressed using br compression on your code. The HTML code is compressed from 134.73 Kb to 30.04 Kb (78% size savings). This helps ensure a faster loading webpage and improved user experience.
Verifies whether the server delivers the HTML using a compression algorithm such as Gzip or Brotli. Compressed responses dramatically reduce transfer size with negligible decompression cost, translating directly into faster page loads, especially on slower connections.
Site Loading Speed Test
71% of top 100 sites passed
The loading time of this webpage (measured from N. Virginia, US) is around 8.64 seconds and is greater than the average loading speed which is 5 seconds!
Related Keywords

Accurate historical loading speed monitor and reports

Get detailed and accurate loading speed reports for your websites and see how your pages are being loaded over time.

Measures the overall time required to load the page in the browser. Page speed is a confirmed Google ranking factor and a strong driver of bounce rate, with slower pages losing a meaningful share of users before they even see the content. Faster pages also tend to convert better, making this a key metric for both SEO and revenue.
JS Execution Time Test
53% of top 100 sites passed
The JavaScript code used by this webpage is executed in more than 3.5 seconds! When the JavaScript code takes a long time to execute, it slows down the page performance in several ways: longer download times, main thread bottlenecks, delays of "Time To Interactive", memory leaks, etc.

JS Execution Time Test

How to pass this test?

This test fails when the browser spends excessive time parsing, compiling, and executing JavaScript while the page loads. Heavy JavaScript work blocks the main thread and is the primary cause of poor Interaction to Next Paint (INP), the Core Web Vital that replaced First Input Delay in 2024 and that Google uses as part of its ranking algorithms. Fixing this issue means shipping less JavaScript, splitting what remains, and deferring everything that is not needed for the initial interaction.

Where to make the change

  • Application code: audit your bundle with a tool such as Bundle Analyzer or Source Map Explorer. Identify the largest dependencies and either remove, replace, or lazy-load them.
  • Build configuration: enable code splitting so each route loads only its own chunk. Tree-shake unused exports from libraries.
  • Third-party scripts: the biggest INP wins often come from removing or deferring analytics, advertising, and tag-management scripts.

Common causes and how to resolve them

  • Single large bundle: split the bundle by route or feature so the user only downloads and executes the code for the current page.
  • Heavy third-party tags: load analytics, ads, and chat widgets after main content with async or defer, or move them into Google Tag Manager so they can be controlled centrally.
  • Unused JavaScript: audit with the Coverage tab in DevTools to find code that loads but never runs on the page. Remove or split it out.
  • Long tasks blocking the main thread: break work into smaller chunks with setTimeout, requestIdleCallback, or scheduler.yield(). Move heavy computation to a Web Worker.
  • Polyfills shipped to modern browsers: use modern-only bundles for ES2017+ and serve legacy polyfills only when needed via differential serving.

Best practices

  • Target sub-200 millisecond INP at the 75th percentile: this is the official "good" threshold for the Core Web Vital.
  • Ship less code: the cheapest JavaScript to execute is the JavaScript you never sent. Audit dependencies for lighter alternatives.
  • Defer non-critical scripts: use defer for scripts that need the DOM, async for fully independent ones.
  • Move CPU-intensive work off the main thread: Web Workers can handle large data transformations without freezing the UI.
Reports the total time the browser spends parsing, compiling, and executing JavaScript while the page loads. Heavy JavaScript work blocks the main thread and is the primary cause of poor Interaction to Next Paint, the Core Web Vital that replaced First Input Delay in 2024 and that Google uses as part of its ranking algorithms. Reducing bundle size and deferring non-critical scripts directly improves perceived performance.
Page Objects Test
7% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is using more than 20 http requests, which can slow down page loading and negatively impact user experience!
Content size by content type
Content type
Percent
Size
javascript
54.8 %
2.40 Mb
image
38.7 %
1.69 Mb
html
3.2 %
145.27 Kb
css
2.3 %
104.75 Kb
font
0.8 %
34.39 Kb
other
0.2 %
6.87 Kb
TOTAL
100%
4.38 Mb
Requests by content type
Content type
Percent
Requests
image
58.5 %
76
javascript
20.8 %
27
other
12.3 %
16
html
4.6 %
6
css
3.1 %
4
font
0.8 %
1
TOTAL
100%
130
Content size by domain
Domain
Percent
Size
keywordtool.io
49.6 %
2.17 Mb
youtube-nocookie.com
23.2 %
1.01 Mb
googletagmanager.com
11.3 %
505.32 Kb
i.ytimg.com
6.8 %
304.43 Kb
js.stripe.com
5.6 %
249.24 Kb
us-assets.i.posthog.com
1.0 %
43.50 Kb
fonts.gstatic.com
0.8 %
34.39 Kb
scripts.clarity.ms
0.6 %
25.38 Kb
google.com
0.5 %
23.73 Kb
m.stripe.network
0.4 %
16.48 Kb
Other
0.5 %
21.21 Kb
TOTAL
100%
4.38 Mb
Requests by domain
Domain
Percent
Requests
keywordtool.io
61.5 %
80
youtube-nocookie.com
10.0 %
13
i.ytimg.com
6.2 %
8
js.stripe.com
2.3 %
3
googletagmanager.com
2.3 %
3
us-assets.i.posthog.com
2.3 %
3
b.clarity.ms
2.3 %
3
dev.visualwebsiteoptimizer.com
1.5 %
2
google.com
1.5 %
2
m.stripe.network
1.5 %
2
Other
8.5 %
11
TOTAL
100%
130
Verifies that every resource the page requests, including images, scripts, stylesheets, and fonts, can be successfully retrieved. Broken or unreachable assets can leave the page rendered incorrectly, trigger console errors, and damage both user experience and how search engines perceive page quality.
CDN Usage Test
95% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is serving all images, javascript and css resources from CDNs.
Detects whether static assets such as images, JavaScript, and CSS are delivered through a Content Delivery Network. CDNs serve files from edge locations close to the user, reducing latency, improving cache hit rates, and offloading traffic from the origin server. The result is faster, more consistent page performance worldwide.
Modern Image Format Test
43% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is not serving images in a modern format! Image formats like JPEG 2000, JPEG XR, and WebP often provide better compression than PNG or JPEG, which means faster downloads and less data consumption.

Modern Image Format Test

How to pass this test?

This test fails when images are served in legacy formats such as JPEG and PNG instead of modern alternatives like WebP or AVIF. Modern formats compress significantly better at equivalent visual quality, which means smaller transfers, faster page loads, and lower data usage for visitors on metered connections. Fixing this issue means generating modern variants and serving them to browsers that support them.

Example

<picture>
  <source srcset="/images/hero.avif" type="image/avif">
  <source srcset="/images/hero.webp" type="image/webp">
  <img src="/images/hero.jpg" alt="Marathon runners at sunrise" width="1600" height="900">
</picture>

Where to make the change

  • Raw HTML: use the <picture> element with multiple <source> entries so the browser picks the best supported format.
  • WordPress: WordPress 6.x and later supports WebP natively. Use a media optimization plugin to convert existing JPEGs and PNGs and serve modern formats automatically.
  • Shopify: Shopify's image CDN can serve WebP automatically; using the image_url filter with format parameter or the image_tag helper handles negotiation.
  • Wix or Squarespace: both platforms convert and serve WebP automatically when supported by the visitor's browser.
  • Headless or framework sites: components like next/image and astro:assets generate AVIF and WebP variants at build time and serve the best format per request.

Common causes and how to resolve them

  • Only legacy formats published: add a build step or image CDN that generates WebP and AVIF alongside the original.
  • Single-format <img> tag: wrap the image in <picture> with <source> entries for AVIF and WebP, falling back to the JPEG.
  • Image CDN not negotiating format: enable automatic format conversion or pass a format=auto query parameter (depends on provider).
  • SVG used where a raster image would be smaller (or vice versa): illustrations and icons should be SVG; photos should be raster in a modern format. Mixing them up wastes bytes.

Best practices

  • AVIF first, WebP fallback, JPEG last: AVIF compresses best, WebP is widely supported, JPEG remains the universal fallback.
  • Match quality to use case: hero images can use higher quality settings; thumbnails can drop quality without visible loss.
  • Use an image CDN: services like Cloudflare Images, Cloudinary, or Imgix handle resizing, format conversion, and caching in one step.
Identifies images served in legacy formats such as JPEG and PNG instead of modern alternatives like WebP or AVIF. Modern formats compress significantly better at equivalent visual quality, which means smaller transfers, faster page loads, and lower data usage for visitors on metered connections.
Image Metadata Test
72% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is not using images with large metadata.
Flags images carrying disproportionately large embedded metadata such as EXIF data, thumbnails, color profiles, geolocation, and camera information. This metadata is rarely useful on the web and adds bytes to every request without any rendering benefit, making it an easy win for shrinking image payloads.
Image Caching Test
95% of top 100 sites passed
This website is not using cache headers for images. Setting cache headers can help speed up the serving of a webpage for returning users. Learn more about how to add expires headers to your images.

Image Caching Test

How to pass this test?

This test fails when image responses lack caching headers that allow browsers to store them for repeat visits. With proper caching directives, returning visitors retrieve images from the local cache instead of refetching them, producing noticeably faster subsequent page loads. Fixing this issue is a server or CDN configuration change.

Where to make the change

  • Server configuration: add Cache-Control headers to image responses. A common setting is Cache-Control: public, max-age=31536000, immutable for versioned assets.
  • CDN configuration: Cloudflare, Fastly, CloudFront, and similar offer rules to set long cache lifetimes for image MIME types.
  • WordPress and plugins: a caching plugin or a CDN integration handles cache headers without server changes.
  • Shopify: Shopify serves images with appropriate cache headers automatically; failures usually point to externally hosted images.

Common causes and how to resolve them

  • No Cache-Control or Expires header: add one. Browsers will revalidate every request without it.
  • Cache-Control: no-cache or no-store: these are correct for HTML responses but wrong for static images. Set a long max-age instead.
  • Short max-age (under a day): images change rarely; a max-age of months or a year is typical.
  • Cookie-bearing image requests: if the image URL sets cookies or varies by user, browsers cannot cache effectively. Serve images from a cookie-free subdomain or your CDN.

Best practices

  • Use versioned filenames: renaming the file when the content changes lets you set near-permanent cache lifetimes without ever serving stale files.
  • Mark immutable assets as such: the immutable directive tells browsers to skip even revalidation requests.
  • Serve from a CDN: CDNs add caching, compression, and edge delivery in one step.
Inspects whether image responses include caching headers that allow browsers to store them for repeat visits. With proper caching directives, returning visitors retrieve images from the local cache instead of refetching them, producing noticeably faster subsequent page loads.
JavaScript Caching Test
96% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is not using cache headers for JavaScript resources! Setting cache headers can help to speed up the webpage for returning users.

JavaScript Caching Test

How to pass this test?

This test fails when external JavaScript files are served without caching headers that allow browsers to store and reuse them. Cached scripts skip the network on repeat visits, reducing load time and bandwidth for returning users. Fixing this issue is a server or CDN configuration change.

Where to make the change

  • Server configuration: add Cache-Control: public, max-age=31536000, immutable to JavaScript responses, paired with versioned filenames.
  • CDN configuration: set a default cache rule for *.js assets at the edge.
  • Build pipeline: emit hashed filenames (for example app.7f3c1e.js) so cache lifetimes can be long without risking stale code.
  • WordPress and plugins: caching and CDN plugins handle JS cache headers automatically.

Common causes and how to resolve them

  • No Cache-Control header: add one. Without it, browsers revalidate on every page load.
  • Short max-age: bump to a year for versioned files. Use a shorter lifetime only for unversioned scripts that may change in place.
  • no-cache or no-store on static JS: remove these directives; they belong on dynamic responses, not static assets.
  • Cookies on script requests: serve scripts from a cookie-free subdomain or a CDN to enable shared caching.

Best practices

  • Versioned filenames: hashed file names plus immutable caching is the gold standard for cache effectiveness.
  • Self-host critical scripts: hosting third-party scripts yourself lets you control cache headers and avoid vendor outages.
  • Audit with DevTools: the Network panel's "Disk cache" column shows whether each script is genuinely served from cache on repeat visits.
Inspects whether external JavaScript files are served with caching headers that allow browsers to store and reuse them. Cached scripts skip the network on repeat visits, reducing load time and bandwidth for returning users without sacrificing the ability to push fresh code by versioning file URLs.
CSS Caching Test
98% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is not using cache headers for CSS resources! Setting cache headers can help to speed up the webpage for returning users.

CSS Caching Test

How to pass this test?

This test fails when external CSS files are served without caching headers that allow browsers to store and reuse them. Cached stylesheets skip the network on repeat visits, reducing load time for returning users while still allowing updates through versioned filenames. Fixing this issue is a server or CDN configuration change.

Where to make the change

  • Server configuration: add Cache-Control: public, max-age=31536000, immutable to CSS responses, paired with versioned filenames.
  • CDN configuration: set a default cache rule for *.css assets at the edge.
  • Build pipeline: emit hashed filenames so cache lifetimes can be long without risking stale styles.
  • WordPress and plugins: caching plugins handle CSS cache headers automatically.

Common causes and how to resolve them

  • No Cache-Control header: add one. Without it, browsers revalidate on every page load.
  • Short max-age: bump to a year for versioned files; keep it shorter only for unversioned files that may change in place.
  • Stylesheets behind authentication: private styles cannot use public caching. Move shared styles to a public path.

Best practices

  • Versioned filenames: hashed names plus immutable caching is the gold standard.
  • Inline critical CSS: the styles needed for above-the-fold rendering can be inlined while the rest is cached and loaded asynchronously.
  • Audit with DevTools: confirm that on repeat visits, the stylesheet is served from disk cache rather than the network.
Inspects whether external CSS files are served with caching headers that allow browsers to store and reuse them. Cached stylesheets skip the network on repeat visits, reducing load time for returning users while still allowing updates through versioned filenames.
JavaScript Minification Test
98% of top 100 sites passed
All JavaScript files used by this webpage are minified.
Detects whether external JavaScript files are minified by stripping whitespace, comments, and shortening identifiers. Minified scripts are substantially smaller and faster to download and parse, which lowers page load time and improves Core Web Vitals scores.
CSS Minification Test
100% of top 100 sites passed
All CSS resources used by this webpage are minified.
Detects whether external CSS files are minified by removing whitespace, comments, and unused characters. Minification reduces stylesheet size with no functional change, leading to faster downloads and quicker first render.
Render Blocking Resources Test
15% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is using render blocking resources! Eliminating render-blocking resources can help this webpage to load significantly faster and will improve the website experience for your visitors.

Render Blocking Resources Test

How to pass this test?

This test fails when JavaScript or CSS resources block the browser from rendering visible content. Each render-blocking file delays the first paint, and on slower networks the cumulative impact can be severe. Fixing this issue means inlining the truly critical CSS, deferring or asynchronously loading non-essential scripts, and removing unused code.

Example

<head>
  <!-- Inline only above-the-fold critical CSS -->
  <style>/* critical styles here */</style>

  <!-- Load full stylesheet asynchronously -->
  <link rel="preload" href="/styles/main.css" as="style"
        onload="this.onload=null;this.rel='stylesheet'">

  <!-- Defer non-critical scripts -->
  <script src="/scripts/app.js" defer></script>
</head>

Where to make the change

  • Application code or templates: identify the CSS and JavaScript needed for the initial render and load only those synchronously. Defer the rest.
  • Build pipeline: use a critical CSS extractor (such as critical or penthouse) to generate the above-the-fold styles automatically.
  • WordPress: performance plugins offer "delay JS execution" and "load CSS asynchronously" options that handle most of this without code changes.
  • Headless or framework sites: use the framework's preload and code-splitting hints to control what blocks rendering.

Common causes and how to resolve them

  • Single large stylesheet blocking render: inline critical CSS for the first viewport, load the full stylesheet asynchronously.
  • Synchronous third-party scripts in the head: add defer or async, or move them to the end of the body.
  • Web fonts blocking text rendering: add font-display: swap in @font-face rules so the fallback font shows immediately.
  • Render-blocking @import in CSS: replace with separate <link rel="stylesheet"> tags so the browser can fetch them in parallel.

Best practices

  • Use defer for scripts that need the DOM: they execute after parsing but before DOMContentLoaded.
  • Use async for fully independent scripts: they execute as soon as they download, in any order.
  • Preload the critical request chain: tell the browser early about fonts and key assets with <link rel="preload">.
  • Audit with Lighthouse: the Render-blocking resources audit lists every offending file with the estimated time saved by deferring it.
Identifies JavaScript and CSS resources that the browser must download and process before it can render visible content. Each render-blocking file delays the first paint, and on slower networks the cumulative impact can be severe. Inlining critical styles, deferring non-essential scripts, and removing unused code all help unblock the rendering path.
URL Redirects Test
97% of top 100 sites passed
This URL doesn't have any redirects (which could potentially cause site indexation issues and site loading delays).
Counts the number of HTTP redirects required for the URL to resolve to its final destination. Each hop adds latency and can dilute link equity, while long redirect chains sometimes confuse crawlers and indexing pipelines. Keeping redirects short and direct is a Google recommendation for both performance and SEO.
Time To First Byte Test
99% of top 100 sites passed
The Time To First Byte value of this webpage is 0.028 seconds. To provide a good user experience, Google recommends that sites should strive to have a TTFB of 0.8 seconds or less.
0.028 s
0.8 s
1.8 s
Measures Time to First Byte, the delay between the browser requesting the page and the first byte of the response arriving. TTFB reflects backend, network, and CDN performance and effectively sets the floor for every other loading metric, since rendering cannot begin until bytes start flowing. Sustained high TTFB usually points to slow server processing, missing edge caching, or inefficient redirects.
First Contentful Paint Test
90% of top 100 sites passed
The First Contentful Paint value of this webpage is 0.760 seconds. To provide a good user experience, Google recommends that sites should strive to have a First Contentful Paint value of 1.8 seconds or less.
0.76 s
1.8 s
3 s
Measures First Contentful Paint, the moment when the browser renders the first piece of visible content from the DOM, such as text, an image, or an SVG. FCP is the first signal to the user that the page is actually loading, and faster values are strongly correlated with lower bounce rates and better Core Web Vitals scores.
Largest Contentful Paint Test
77% of top 100 sites passed
The Largest Contentful Paint duration of this webpage is 0.76 seconds. To provide a good user experience, Google recommends that sites should strive to have Largest Contentful Paint of 2.5 seconds or less.
0.76 s
2.5 s
4 s
Largest Contentful Paint element within the viewport:
Text: Research Keywords Using Google Autocomplete
Html: <h1 class="mb-6 text-center">
Measures Largest Contentful Paint, the time at which the largest visible element in the viewport, such as a hero image or main heading, finishes rendering. LCP is one of Google's Core Web Vitals and a direct ranking factor, used as a proxy for when the user perceives the page as effectively loaded.
Cumulative Layout Shift Test
91% of top 100 sites passed
The CLS score of this webpage is 0.0000. To provide a good user experience, Google recommends that sites should strive to have a CLS score of 0.1 or less.
0
0.1
0.25
Measures Cumulative Layout Shift, the total amount that visible elements move around unexpectedly while the page loads. Layout shifts cause users to misclick and feel the page is unstable, and CLS is one of Google's Core Web Vitals and a direct ranking factor. Common causes include images without explicit dimensions, late-loading fonts, and aggressively injected overlays such as cookie consent banners.

Server and security

Score:100
Failed:0
Warnings:0
Passed:7
URL Canonicalization Test
93% of top 100 sites passed
Detects whether different URL variants of the site, such as the apex domain and the www subdomain or HTTP and HTTPS, all resolve consistently to a single canonical version. When the same content is reachable at multiple URLs without proper redirects, search engines may split ranking signals across the variants and become unsure which one to index.
SSL Checker and HTTPS Test
100% of top 100 sites passed
This website is successfully using HTTPS, a secure communication protocol over the Internet.
The certificate is not used before the activation date.
The certificate has not expired.
The hostname "keywordtool.io" is correctly listed in the certificate.
The certificate should be trusted by all major web browsers.
The certificate was not revoked.
The certificate was signed with a secure hash.
Certificate Chain:
Server certificate
Common Name
keywordtool.io
Subject Alternative Names
keywordtool.io, *.keywordtool.io, *.api.keywordtool.io, *.dataproxy.keywordtool.io, *.dev.keywordtool.io
Not Valid Before
Sun, August 23, 2026 at 12:59:21 PM UTC
Not Valid After
Sat, November 21, 2026 at 1:59:16 PM UTC
Signature Algorithm
ecdsaWithSha256
Issuer
WE1
Root certificate
Common Name
WE1
Organization
Google Trust Services
Location
US
Not Valid Before
Wed, December 13, 2023 at 9:00:00 AM UTC
Not Valid After
Tue, February 20, 2029 at 2:00:00 PM UTC
Signature Algorithm
ecdsaWithSha384
Issuer
GTS Root R4
Verifies whether the site is served over HTTPS with a valid TLS certificate. HTTPS encrypts the connection between visitor and server, protecting credentials and other sensitive data in transit, and Google has used it as a positive ranking signal since 2014. Modern browsers also flag non-HTTPS pages as Not Secure, which damages user trust.
Mixed Content Test (HTTP over HTTPS)
100% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage does not use mixed content - both the initial HTML and all other resources are loaded over HTTPS.
Detects whether a page served over HTTPS is loading any sub-resources such as images, scripts, or stylesheets over insecure HTTP. Mixed content weakens the security guarantees of HTTPS, and modern browsers either block the resources outright or warn the user, often breaking the page in the process.
HTTP2 Test
99% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is using the HTTP/2 protocol.
Verifies whether the page and its resources are delivered over HTTP/2 or newer, rather than the legacy HTTP/1.1 protocol. HTTP/2 introduces multiplexing, header compression, and prioritization, which together reduce latency and allow the browser to load many resources from the same origin far more efficiently.
HSTS Test
84% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is using the Strict-Transport-Security header.
strict-transport-security:max-age=15552000
Checks whether the server sends a Strict-Transport-Security header instructing browsers to only access the site over HTTPS. HSTS protects users from protocol downgrade attacks and accidental exposure to insecure connections, and is a baseline requirement for any site handling sensitive data.
Plaintext Emails Test
97% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage does not include email addresses in plaintext.
Scans the page for email addresses written in plain text. Spambots harvest such addresses to add them to bulk mailing lists, so obfuscating contact emails or replacing them with contact forms helps reduce inbox spam without hiding the address from legitimate visitors.

Mobile usability

Score:100
Failed:0
Warnings:0
Passed:3
Meta Viewport Test
92% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is using a viewport meta tag.
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1, shrink-to-fit=no" />
Checks whether the page declares a viewport meta tag that controls how the layout scales on mobile devices. Without it, mobile browsers render the page at a default desktop width and shrink it to fit, producing unreadable text and unusable touch targets. A correct viewport declaration is the foundation of responsive design.
Media Query Responsive Test
98% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is using CSS media queries, which is the base for responsive design functionalities.
Detects whether the page's stylesheets use CSS media queries to adapt the layout to different screen sizes. Media queries are the primary mechanism for responsive design, allowing typography, spacing, and component arrangement to adjust gracefully from phones to large desktops. Because Google now indexes the web mobile-first, the responsive mobile layout is effectively the version search engines crawl, evaluate, and rank.
Mobile Snapshot Test
Mobile view
A rendered screenshot of how the page appears on a mobile device. Useful for visually confirming that responsive layouts work as intended and for spotting issues such as overflowing content, illegible text, or broken images that automated checks alone may miss.

Advanced SEO

Score:98
Failed:1
Warnings:1
Passed:7
Structured Data Test
66% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is using structured data.
Inspects the page for structured data markup such as JSON-LD or Microdata that follows schema.org vocabularies. Structured data helps search engines understand entities and relationships on the page, often unlocking rich result features in SERPs such as star ratings, FAQs, recipes, and product cards. It is also a primary signal AI answer engines use to extract precise facts when generating responses.
Custom 404 Error Page Test
80% of top 100 sites passed
This website is using a custom 404 error page. We recommend to have a custom 404 error page in order to improve the website's user experience by letting users know that only a specific page is missing/broken (and not the entire site), providing them helpful links, the opportunity to report bugs, and potentially track the source of broken links.
Detects whether the site serves a branded, helpful page when a requested URL is not found, instead of the browser's generic error screen. A custom 404 keeps users on the site by offering navigation, search, or suggested links, which reduces frustration and protects engagement metrics that influence both UX perception and indirect SEO outcomes.
Noindex Tag Test
99% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage does not use the noindex meta tag. This means that it can be indexed by search engines.
Detects whether the page is being excluded from search engine indexes via a noindex directive in the robots meta tag or X-Robots-Tag HTTP header. A noindex on the wrong page is one of the most common ways important content silently disappears from search results, so verifying its absence on pages meant to rank is critical.
Canonical Tag Test
93% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage does not use the canonical link tag.
Detects whether the page declares a canonical link tag indicating its preferred URL. Canonical tags consolidate ranking signals across duplicate or near-duplicate URLs onto a single authoritative version, which prevents search engines from splitting authority across variants caused by query parameters, session IDs, or alternate paths. They also help AI crawlers identify the source of truth when citing the page.
Nofollow Tag Test
This webpage is using the nofollow meta tag! We recommend to use this tag carefully since search engines will not crawl all links from this webpage.

Nofollow Tag Test

How to pass this test?

This test reports on whether the page applies a nofollow directive that tells search engines not to follow outbound links. The nofollow attribute (and the related sponsored and ugc values) controls how link equity flows from your page. Fixing this issue means using the right rel value on each external link based on its purpose so signals are passed only where you intend.

Where to make the change

  • Raw HTML: add rel="nofollow", rel="sponsored", or rel="ugc" to specific outbound links rather than blanket-applying them site-wide.
  • WordPress: the block editor offers a "mark as nofollow" option per link, and SEO plugins can auto-tag external links by domain.
  • Shopify, Wix, Squarespace: editor-generated links allow rel attribute toggles; manual HTML embeds need them set explicitly.
  • Headless or framework sites: wrap external links in a component that decides the rel based on the link's classification.

Common causes and how to resolve them

  • Site-wide nofollow on every external link: overly aggressive. Reserve nofollow for sponsored, untrusted, or user-generated content.
  • Sponsored content not labeled: use rel="sponsored" on paid placements and affiliate links to comply with Google's link spam policy.
  • User-generated content unmarked: comments, forum posts, and review user submissions should use rel="ugc".
  • Trusted editorial links nofollowed: these should pass equity. Remove the nofollow.

Best practices

  • Use the most specific value: sponsored for paid links, ugc for user content, nofollow for everything else you want to disclaim. They can be combined: rel="sponsored noopener".
  • Do not nofollow internal links: "PageRank sculpting" with internal nofollow no longer works and just wastes crawl signal.
  • Audit periodically: as content ages, sponsored relationships change. Review affiliate and partner links once a year.
Detects whether the page applies a nofollow directive, either through a robots meta tag, an X-Robots-Tag header, or per-link rel attributes, that tells search engines not to follow outbound links. Google recommends nofollow for sponsored links and for user-generated content where the linked sites are not vetted, so its presence or absence has real consequences for how link equity flows.
Disallow Directive Test
Your robots.txt file includes a disallow command which instructs search engines to avoid certain parts of your website! You are advised to confirm if access to these resources or pages are intended to be blocked (e.g., if they contain internal-only content or sensitive information).
Surfaces the disallow rules declared in the site's robots.txt file. Disallow directives tell search engine crawlers not to access specific files, paths, or directories, which is useful for keeping admin sections and duplicate content out of indexes but dangerous when applied too broadly, since over-blocking can hide important pages from search.
Meta Refresh Test
98% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is not using a meta refresh tag.
Detects whether the page uses a meta refresh tag to automatically reload or redirect after a delay. Meta refresh is largely obsolete, hurts accessibility by jumping focus and disorienting screen reader users, and is a weaker signal to search engines than a proper server-side 301 redirect. Its presence usually indicates outdated implementation worth updating.
SPF Records Test
94% of top 100 sites passed
This DNS server is using an SPF record.
v=spf1 ip4:198.37.156.46 include:_spf.google.com include:spf.braintreegateway.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:customeriomail.com -all
Checks the domain's DNS for a Sender Policy Framework record. SPF lets receiving mail servers verify that messages claiming to come from the domain were actually sent by an authorized mail server, which significantly reduces the chance of legitimate email being marked as spam and protects the domain's sender reputation.
Ads.txt Validation Test
67% of top 100 sites passed
This website doesn't use an ads.txt file! Ads.txt is a text file that contains a list of Authorized Digital Sellers. The purpose of ads.txt files is to give advertisers and advertising networks the ability to verify who is allowed to sell advertising on your website.
Validates the format of the site's ads.txt file, which publishers use to declare which advertising vendors are authorized to sell their inventory programmatically. A correctly formatted ads.txt protects against domain spoofing in the ad supply chain and is required for inclusion in many premium advertising marketplaces.

Dominate search today on Google and AI Engines.

Join 85,000+ SaaS Marketers, Growth Agencies, Content-Led Companies and E-commerce Brands.

See Pricing
Dashboard preview showing SEO site checkup metrics, page group insights, and issue prioritization