Skip to main content
Archived

SEO Report for https://bc8888.id

Your general SEO Checkup Score

SEO Score82/100
Average SEO score of top 100 sites: 75%This value indicates the average SEO score of the top 100 most visited websites in the US (in the past 12 months)
AI Visibility61/100
AI visibility score reflects brand reach in AI

Your site scored 82/100, just above the 75 average for top sites. We found 8 issues to fix, and they're what's holding you back from the top spots. And an AI Visibility Score of 61/100 means ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity mention your brand some of the time, with clear room to push further.

8 Failed
2 Warnings
53 Passed

Want to fix these issues and track your progress?

Issues to fix

HIGH
To address URL canonicalization issues, it is recommended to select a primary URL for your webpage and set up redirects from all other variations to the preferred one.
Details
HIGH
To improve the website experience for your visitors, it is recommended to eliminate any render-blocking resources on this webpage.
Details
HIGH
Using images in a modern format can significantly reduce the file size and improve the loading speed of a webpage, providing a better user experience and potentially increasing engagement.
Details
MEDIUM
Serve properly sized images to reduce page loading times and to improve user's experience.
Details
MEDIUM
Avoid using distorted images, as they can have a negative impact on the user experience.
Details
MEDIUM
By creating a custom 404 error page with helpful links and information, users are more likely to stay on the site and continue to explore.
Details
LOW
Without an SPF record, spammers can easily spoof emails from this domain, potentially leading to compromised email security and deliverability issues.
Details
LOW
This website either lacks a favicon or it has not been referenced properly.
Details

AI Insights

Score:0
Failed:0
Warnings:0
Passed:5
Domain Business Context
Understanding the business context of a domain can help you create content that is more relevant to your target audience and differentiate your website from competitors.

What is this domain about

An informational guide site about BC888 account access, Android APK checks, login, registration, and promo terms.

Industry Niche

Online gaming guide content

Target Audience

Users looking for guidance on account setup, app installation checks, login access, and understanding bonus or reward terms.

This test will check the business context of the domain associated with the analyzed webpage. The business context includes the domain's description, target audience and industry niche (if applicable). Understanding the business context of a domain can help you create content that is more relevant to your target audience and differentiate your website from competitors.
LLM Visibility Checker
LLM Visibility Checker

Track your brand across ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude

Get an AI Presence Score, see which of your pages get cited, and follow how you compare with competitors over time.

How visible your brand is to AI engines
Content Strengths and Weaknesses

This webpage is clear, structured, and purpose-driven, with practical guidance organized around common user tasks. Its main weakness is limited depth and a lack of supporting credibility signals such as authorship, policies, or external references.

Content Strengths

  • Clear task-based structure
  • Practical safety guidance
  • Readable plain language

Content Weaknesses

  • Limited topic depth
  • No cited sources
  • Missing author details
This test will analyze the content of the webpage to identify its strengths and weaknesses. The analysis includes factors such as keyword usage, readability, originality, and relevance to the target audience. By understanding the strengths and weaknesses of your content, you can make informed decisions about how to improve it and better meet the needs of your audience.
Content Trust
58%
Topical Relevance92%
Subject Expertise63%
Credibility35%

This webpage appears moderately trustworthy because it stays tightly focused on its stated topics and gives cautious, practical advice. Trust is limited by the absence of visible author attribution, company details, policy pages, contact information, and cited sources on the page.

This test will evaluate the trustworthiness of the content on the webpage. It assesses factors such as the credibility of sources, accuracy of information, and overall reliability. A high level of content trust can enhance your website's reputation and improve its ranking in search engine results.
Visual SEO Analysis
Visual SEO Analysis

Find out if your page design converts the visitors you earn

We score six things that decide whether a visitor stays and acts, from the first screen to the path to action, and rank every fix by effort and impact.

How your page's design and UX affect conversions
Content Freshness
68%

The page feels current in a general sense because it discusses active app access, login, APK checks, and promo terms using present-tense guidance. However, it does not show explicit publish or update timestamps, so freshness must be inferred mainly from the evergreen nature of the content and the current promotional framing.

Positive Signals

  • Current access and promo guidance
  • Present-tense instructional language
  • Active promotional theme examples

Staleness Signals

  • No publish or update dates
  • No time-specific news content
  • No version or release timestamps
This test will check the freshness of the content on the webpage. It evaluates how recently the content was created or updated, and whether it remains relevant to current trends and user interests. Fresh content can attract more visitors and improve your website's ranking in search engine results.
Content Opportunities

The page already covers the core user journey well, but it leaves room for deeper, more actionable guidance and stronger trust-building elements. The biggest opportunities are to expand practical detail, add verification resources, and make the content more useful for users comparing access, app, and promo information.

Quick Wins

  • •Add a short FAQ section under each main guide with the most common user questions and answers.
  • •Insert a simple promo checklist that tells readers exactly what to verify before trusting a banner.
  • •Create a visible About/Contact block in the footer with ownership and support details.
This test will identify potential content opportunities for the webpage. It analyzes the current content landscape, identifies gaps in coverage, and suggests topics or keywords that could be targeted to attract more visitors and improve search engine rankings.

Common SEO issues

Score:87
Failed:3
Warnings:0
Passed:16
Meta Title Test
100% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is using a title tag.
Text: BC888: Panduan Akun, APK dan Informasi Promo
Length: 44 characters
The meta title is an HTML element that defines a page's title, displayed in search engine results, browser tabs, and bookmark lists. A concise, keyword-relevant title is a strong on-page ranking signal and a major driver of organic click-through rate. AI answer engines and LLM-driven search experiences also rely on the title to identify, summarize, and cite the page in generative results.
Meta Description Test
92% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is using a meta description tag.
Text: Kenali BC888 melalui panduan akun, akses APK dan informasi promo. Pelajari pemeriksaan sumber aplikasi, keamanan login serta cara membaca ketentuan bonus.
Length: 154 characters
The meta description is an HTML tag that provides a short summary of a page's content, often shown beneath the title in search results. While not a direct ranking factor, an accurate and inviting description significantly improves click-through rate from organic listings. AI answer engines and social platforms also use it as a trusted summary when generating previews, citations and shareable snippets.
Google Search Results Preview Test
Desktop version
https://bc8888.id/BC888: Panduan Akun, APK dan Informasi PromoKenali BC888 melalui panduan akun, akses APK dan informasi promo. Pelajari pemeriksaan sumber aplikasi, keamanan login serta cara membaca ketentuan bonus.
Mobile version
https://bc8888.id/BC888: Panduan Akun, APK dan Informasi PromoKenali BC888 melalui panduan akun, akses APK dan informasi promo. Pelajari pemeriksaan sumber aplikasi, keamanan login serta cara membaca ketentuan bonus.
A simulated preview of how the page may appear in Google search results, combining the title, URL, and meta description as Google typically renders them. Useful for spotting truncated text, weak phrasing, or missing elements before publishing, since the snippet directly influences whether searchers click through.
Social Media Meta Tags Test
89% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is using social media meta tags.
Open Graph Meta Tags
og:typewebsite
og:titleBC888: Panduan Akun, APK dan Informasi Promo
og:descriptionKenali BC888 melalui panduan akun, akses APK dan informasi promo. Pelajari pemeriksaan sumber aplikasi, keamanan login serta cara membaca ketentuan bonus.
og:urlhttps://bc8888.id/
og:imagehttps://bc8888.id/assets/images/characters.png
og:localeid_ID
Twitter Card Meta Tags
twitter:cardsummary_large_image
twitter:titleBC888: Panduan Akun, APK dan Informasi Promo
twitter:descriptionKenali BC888 melalui panduan akun, akses APK dan informasi promo. Pelajari pemeriksaan sumber aplikasi, keamanan login serta cara membaca ketentuan bonus.
twitter:imagehttps://bc8888.id/assets/images/characters.png
Open Graph and Twitter Card meta tags tell social platforms and link unfurlers how to display a page when its URL is shared. Well-formed tags produce richer previews with the intended title, description, and image, which improves click-through on social channels. They also serve as a structured signal that AI crawlers and answer engines can use when summarizing the page.
Most Common Keywords Test
There is likely no optimal keyword density (search engine algorithms have evolved beyond keyword density metrics as a significant ranking factor). It can be useful, however, to note which keywords appear most often on your page and if they reflect the intended topic of your page. More importantly, the keywords on your page should appear within natural sounding and grammatically correct copy.
29yang
16akun
14informasi
14panduan
12anda
A frequency analysis of the most repeated words and phrases in the page's visible content. Useful for getting a quick sense of which topics search engines are likely to associate with the page, and for spotting cases where the actual content drifts from the intended subject.
Keywords Usage Test
48% of top 100 sites passed
The most common keywords of this webpage are distributed well across the important HTML tags. This helps search engines to properly identify the topic of this webpage.
Keyword
Title tag
Meta description
Headings
yang
akun
informasi
panduan
anda
Cross-checks whether the most frequently used keywords on the page also appear in the title and meta description. Alignment between body content and metadata helps search engines confirm the page's topic and reinforces relevance for those terms.
Keywords Cloud Test
adalah
akses
aktif
akun
anda
android
apakah
aplikasi
atau
baca
bahasa
bahwa
beranda
berkas
berlaku
bonus
browser
buka
bukan
cara
daftar
dahulu
dapat
dari
dengan
dimulai
diperiksa
english
gambar
guides
gunakan
hadiah
halaman
harian
harus
identitas
indonesia
informasi
information
instalasi
jangan
jika
kata
keamanan
kebutuhan
kenali
ketentuan
klaim
kredensial
layanan
lebih
login
masih
masuk
materi
melalui
memasang
membaca
membuat
mengandalkan
mengenali
menjelaskan
mingguan
nama
pada
panduan
pemasangan
pemeriksaan
pemulihan
penawaran
penerbit
periksa
perlu
persiapan
persyaratan
pertanyaan
promo
promosi
reward
sebelum
sebuah
serta
sesuai
situs
sudah
sumber
syarat
tanpa
tema
temukan
tentang
tersebut
tersedia
tetapi
tidak
topik
umum
untuk
versi
yang
A visual word cloud of the page's content, with more frequent terms shown in larger text. Provides a quick at-a-glance view of which words dominate the page, helping confirm that the visible content reflects the intended topic.
Related Keywords Test
Related Keywords

See which keywords rank your URL in Google’s top 20

Get key keyword metrics like average position, search volume, CPC, and more.

A list of search queries for which the page already appears in the top organic results. Highlights the topical territory the page is winning in search and can surface unexpected terms that present new content or optimization opportunities.
Competitor Domains Test
Competitor Domains

Understand your competitors' SEO and backlink profile

Get related competitors and their domain authority score in relation to your domain.

Identifies up to ten domains that compete for similar organic search results, ranked by overall domain authority based on the volume and quality of their backlink profiles. Useful for benchmarking the competitive landscape and prioritizing which sites to study for content and link-building strategy.
Heading Tags Test
62% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage contains headings tags.
H1 tags
BC888: Panduan Akun, Aplikasi dan Promo
H2 tags
Temukan panduan sesuai kebutuhan Anda
BC888 APK dan akses melalui browser
Akun dan keamanan akses
Mengenali tema pada materi promosi
Informasi yang perlu diperiksa lebih dahulu
Pertanyaan umum tentang BC888
Kenali tema promosi
Panduan BC888 lainnya
Inspects the page for H1 and H2 heading tags and reports their structure. Headings give both users and search engines a clear outline of the page's topics, with the H1 acting as the primary subject and H2s framing major sections. A clean heading hierarchy also helps AI answer engines segment the content into discrete passages they can quote or summarize.
Robots.txt Test
99% of top 100 sites passed
This website is using a robots.txt file.
https://bc8888.id/robots.txt
Verifies whether the site exposes a robots.txt file at the root domain. This file is the first resource most crawlers request, telling search engines and other bots which paths they may or may not access. It is also the standard mechanism for allowing or blocking modern AI crawlers used by training pipelines and answer engines.
Sitemap Test
83% of top 100 sites passed
This website has a sitemap file.
https://bc8888.id/sitemap.xml
Looks for an XML sitemap on the site and reports whether one is published. Sitemaps give search engines an explicit, machine-readable list of the URLs you want crawled, along with metadata such as last-modified dates, which speeds up discovery of new and updated pages. They are especially useful for large sites or those with weak internal linking.
Image Alt Test
78% of top 100 sites passed
All "img" tags from this webpage have the required "alt" attribute.
Inspects whether images on the page include descriptive alt attributes. Alt text provides accessibility for screen readers, a fallback when images fail to load, and a textual signal that helps search engines understand image content. It also improves how AI crawlers and image search tools interpret and surface the visuals.
Responsive Image Test
29% of top 100 sites passed
Not all images in this webpage are properly sized! This webpage is serving images that are larger than needed for the size of the user's viewport.

Responsive Image Test

How to pass this test?

This test fails when one or more images on the page are served at dimensions significantly larger than the size at which the browser actually renders them. Fixing this issue means resizing the source files (or serving responsive variants) so the bytes downloaded match the pixels actually displayed. The result is faster page loads, lower data usage, and better Core Web Vitals scores.

Example

<img
  src="/images/hero-800.jpg"
  srcset="/images/hero-400.jpg 400w,
          /images/hero-800.jpg 800w,
          /images/hero-1600.jpg 1600w"
  sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 800px"
  alt="Marathon runners at sunrise"
  width="800" height="450">

Where to make the change

  • Raw HTML: use srcset and sizes to let the browser pick the right variant for the user's viewport. Always include intrinsic width and height attributes.
  • WordPress: WordPress generates multiple image sizes automatically. Use the the_post_thumbnail() helper or the block editor's image block, both of which emit responsive srcset markup.
  • Shopify: use the image_url Liquid filter with size parameters (for example {{ image | image_url: width: 800 }}) and pair with image_tag to emit a responsive image.
  • Wix or Squarespace: both platforms generate responsive variants automatically; this issue is typically caused by uploading a deliberately oversized image.
  • Headless or framework sites: use the framework's image component (for example next/image or astro:assets), which generates responsive variants and lazy-loads off-screen images.

Common causes and how to resolve them

  • Original camera or stock-photo file uploaded as-is: a 6000-pixel-wide JPEG rendered in a 400-pixel column wastes most of the bytes. Resize the source or generate responsive variants.
  • No srcset: the browser has no choice but to use the single source. Add multiple variants so mobile users get smaller files.
  • Hero images sized for ultra-wide displays: if your largest layout is 1600 pixels, do not ship a 4000-pixel original.
  • Background images set in CSS without responsive sources: use the image-set() CSS function or media queries to swap in different image files at different breakpoints.

Best practices

  • Generate variants at common widths: 400, 800, 1200, and 1600 pixels covers most viewports cleanly.
  • Always set width and height: intrinsic dimensions let the browser reserve space and avoid layout shift, helping CLS.
  • Lazy-load off-screen images: add loading="lazy" to images below the fold so the browser only downloads them when needed.
  • Pair with modern formats: resizing alone is good; resizing and serving WebP or AVIF compounds the savings.
Compares the natural dimensions of each image to the size at which it is actually rendered in the user's viewport. Serving images significantly larger than needed wastes bandwidth, slows page load, and forces the browser to scale assets unnecessarily, all of which hurt performance and user experience.
Image Aspect Ratio Test
75% of top 100 sites passed
Not all image display dimensions match the natural aspect ratio! Fix aspect ratio issues to avoid distorted images on this website!

Image Aspect Ratio Test

How to pass this test?

This test fails when one or more images are rendered at an aspect ratio meaningfully different from the source file's native ratio, producing stretched or squashed visuals. Fixing this issue means either using width and height attributes that match the file's real dimensions or replacing the source with a correctly proportioned crop.

Example

<!-- Source file is 1600 x 900 (16:9). Set matching attributes: -->
<img src="/images/marathon-1600.jpg"
     alt="Marathon runners at sunrise"
     width="1600" height="900"
     style="max-width: 100%; height: auto;">

Where to make the change

  • Raw HTML and CSS: set the width and height attributes to the source file's native dimensions. Use CSS height: auto when scaling responsively so the browser preserves the ratio.
  • WordPress: when inserting an image via the block editor, choose the image's intended size rather than overriding dimensions in custom CSS.
  • Shopify, Wix, or Squarespace: use the platform's built-in image cropper so the displayed crop matches the source file you upload.
  • Headless or framework sites: components like next/image require both width and height, which prevents distortion when the layout scales.

Common causes and how to resolve them

  • Hard-coded width and height that do not match the file: recompute them from the source dimensions or remove them and rely on the file's intrinsic ratio.
  • Container has a fixed height that crops the image: use CSS object-fit: cover if cropping is intentional, or change the container so the image keeps its natural ratio.
  • Wrong source file uploaded: swap in a correctly proportioned crop rather than stretching the wrong file in CSS.

Best practices

  • Always set both width and height: the browser uses these to reserve space and avoid layout shift before the image loads, which helps CLS.
  • Use object-fit when cropping is intentional: cover fills the container without distortion; contain letterboxes to preserve the full image.
  • Standardize on a few aspect ratios: picking one or two ratios per template makes it easier to crop assets consistently and avoid one-off distortions.
Compares each image's natural aspect ratio against the ratio at which it is displayed on the page. Significant mismatches result in stretched or squashed visuals that look unprofessional and degrade the user experience.
Deprecated HTML Tags Test
94% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage does not use HTML deprecated tags.
Scans the markup for HTML elements that are no longer part of the modern HTML specification. Deprecated tags may still render today, but browsers can drop support at any time, leading to broken layouts and rendering inconsistencies. Replacing them with current standards keeps the page resilient and easier to maintain.
Google Analytics Test
72% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is using Google Analytics.
Detects whether the page is instrumented with Google Analytics tracking code. Analytics is not an SEO ranking factor, but having reliable traffic and behavior data is essential for measuring the impact of SEO work and identifying opportunities for improvement.
Favicon Test
100% of top 100 sites passed
This website either doesn't have a favicon or this has not been referenced correctly!

Favicon Test

How to pass this test?

A favicon is the small icon associated with the site, shown in browser tabs, bookmarks, history listings, and increasingly in search engine results. Fixing this issue means publishing a favicon at the conventional location and declaring it in the page <head> so browsers and search engines can find and display it.

Example

<head>
  <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" sizes="any">
  <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.svg" type="image/svg+xml">
  <link rel="apple-touch-icon" href="/apple-touch-icon.png">
</head>

Where to make the change

  • Raw HTML: upload favicon.ico to the site root and add the <link rel="icon"> tags in the <head>.
  • WordPress: upload the icon under Appearance, Customize, Site Identity, Site Icon. WordPress will emit the correct link tags.
  • Shopify: upload the icon under Online Store, Themes, Customize, Theme settings, Favicon.
  • Wix or Squarespace: both expose a favicon upload field in the site or design settings.
  • Headless or framework sites: place the favicon files in the public or static directory so they ship at the root paths.

Common causes and how to resolve them

  • No favicon at the root: add at least /favicon.ico. Most browsers fall back to fetching this path even when no link tag is present.
  • Wrong MIME type: if the favicon is served as text/html instead of image/x-icon or image/svg+xml, browsers will not render it. Check the response in the network tab.
  • Cached old icon after replacement: browsers cache favicons aggressively. Append a query string (?v=2) to bust the cache.
  • Missing high-resolution variants: modern devices need 180 x 180 (Apple), 192 x 192 (Android), and 512 x 512 (PWA) sizes for crisp rendering.

Best practices

  • Provide an SVG version: SVG favicons scale crisply at any size and support light or dark scheme variants.
  • Include an Apple touch icon: a 180 x 180 PNG named apple-touch-icon.png at the root makes the site look correct when added to an iOS home screen.
  • Use a consistent visual identity: the favicon should match the brand mark so users recognize the site at a glance in tabs and bookmarks.
  • Test in both light and dark mode: some browsers render the tab background differently. Make sure the icon stays legible in both.
Verifies whether the site declares a favicon and that it loads correctly. Favicons appear in browser tabs, bookmarks, and increasingly in search engine result pages, where they reinforce brand recognition and make a listing easier to spot at a glance.
Backlinks Test
Backlinks

Get a full and detailed list of your backlinks

See every website linking to yours, along with detailed backlink data.

Surfaces the external pages that link to the analyzed URL. Backlinks from authoritative, topically relevant sites remain one of the strongest off-page ranking signals, while a profile dominated by low-quality or spammy links can attract algorithmic penalties. Reviewing the inbound link mix helps identify both link-building wins and toxic links worth disavowing.
JS Error Test
83% of top 100 sites passed
There are no severe JavaScript errors on this webpage.
Inspects the page for JavaScript runtime errors that occur as it loads. Unhandled errors can break interactive features, leave content unrendered, and signal poor code quality, all of which hurt the user experience that search engines factor into rankings.
Console Errors Test
27% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage doesn't have any warnings or errors caught by the Chrome DevTools Console.
Reviews the browser console for warnings and errors emitted while the page loads. Console messages often expose underlying issues such as failed network requests, deprecated APIs, or security warnings that can quietly degrade the experience even when the page appears to work.
Charset Declaration Test
96% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage has a character encoding declaration.
meta charset="utf-8"
Checks whether the page declares a character encoding such as UTF-8. Without an explicit charset declaration, browsers must guess the encoding, which can lead to garbled symbols, broken accented characters, and inconsistent rendering across devices. UTF-8 is the modern standard recommended by Google.

Speed optimizations

Score:82
Failed:2
Warnings:1
Passed:17
HTML Page Size Test
23% of top 100 sites passed
The size of this webpage's HTML is 4.79 Kb and is under the average webpage's HTML size of 33 Kb. Faster loading websites result in a better user experience, higher conversion rates, and generally better search engine rankings.
Measures the size of the raw HTML document, excluding images and external CSS or JavaScript. Bloated HTML increases time to first byte and parsing time, slowing down rendering on mobile networks and lower-powered devices. Trimming inline styles, redundant markup, and oversized inline data keeps initial load fast.
DOM Size Test
56% of top 100 sites passed
The Document Object Model (DOM) of this webpage has 188 nodes which is less than the recommended value of 1,500 nodes.
Measures the size and depth of the page's Document Object Model, the tree of nodes the browser builds from the HTML. Very large DOMs increase memory usage, lengthen style and layout calculations, and slow down rendering, particularly on mobile devices. Keeping the DOM lean improves both load time and runtime responsiveness.
HTML Compression/GZIP Test
99% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is successfully compressed using zstd compression on your code. The HTML code is compressed from 18.37 Kb to 4.79 Kb (74% size savings). This helps ensure a faster loading webpage and improved user experience.
Verifies whether the server delivers the HTML using a compression algorithm such as Gzip or Brotli. Compressed responses dramatically reduce transfer size with negligible decompression cost, translating directly into faster page loads, especially on slower connections.
Site Loading Speed Test
71% of top 100 sites passed
The loading time of this webpage (measured from N. Virginia, US) is around 4.15 seconds and this is under the average loading speed which is 5 seconds.
Related Keywords

Accurate historical loading speed monitor and reports

Get detailed and accurate loading speed reports for your websites and see how your pages are being loaded over time.

Measures the overall time required to load the page in the browser. Page speed is a confirmed Google ranking factor and a strong driver of bounce rate, with slower pages losing a meaningful share of users before they even see the content. Faster pages also tend to convert better, making this a key metric for both SEO and revenue.
JS Execution Time Test
53% of top 100 sites passed
The JavaScript code used by this webpage is executed in less than 2 seconds.
Reports the total time the browser spends parsing, compiling, and executing JavaScript while the page loads. Heavy JavaScript work blocks the main thread and is the primary cause of poor Interaction to Next Paint, the Core Web Vital that replaced First Input Delay in 2024 and that Google uses as part of its ranking algorithms. Reducing bundle size and deferring non-critical scripts directly improves perceived performance.
Page Objects Test
7% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage has less than 20 http requests. A higher number of http requests results in a user's browser needing to request a large number of objects from the server, which will ultimately slow down the loading of your webpage.
Content size by content type
Content type
Percent
Size
image
84.1 %
1.13 Mb
javascript
15.2 %
209.84 Kb
html
0.4 %
5.17 Kb
css
0.2 %
2.69 Kb
other
0.1 %
1.69 Kb
font
0.0 %
0 B
TOTAL
100%
1.35 Mb
Requests by content type
Content type
Percent
Requests
image
57.9 %
11
javascript
26.3 %
5
html
5.3 %
1
css
5.3 %
1
other
5.3 %
1
font
0.0 %
0
TOTAL
100%
19
Content size by domain
Domain
Percent
Size
bc8888.id
84.8 %
1.14 Mb
googletagmanager.com
12.7 %
175.58 Kb
hm.baidu.com
1.7 %
23.84 Kb
static.cloudflareinsights.com
0.7 %
10.23 Kb
TOTAL
100%
1.35 Mb
Requests by domain
Domain
Percent
Requests
bc8888.id
68.4 %
13
hm.baidu.com
21.1 %
4
static.cloudflareinsights.com
5.3 %
1
googletagmanager.com
5.3 %
1
TOTAL
100%
19
Verifies that every resource the page requests, including images, scripts, stylesheets, and fonts, can be successfully retrieved. Broken or unreachable assets can leave the page rendered incorrectly, trigger console errors, and damage both user experience and how search engines perceive page quality.
CDN Usage Test
95% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is serving all images, javascript and css resources from CDNs.
Detects whether static assets such as images, JavaScript, and CSS are delivered through a Content Delivery Network. CDNs serve files from edge locations close to the user, reducing latency, improving cache hit rates, and offloading traffic from the origin server. The result is faster, more consistent page performance worldwide.
Modern Image Format Test
43% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is not serving images in a modern format! Image formats like JPEG 2000, JPEG XR, and WebP often provide better compression than PNG or JPEG, which means faster downloads and less data consumption.

Modern Image Format Test

How to pass this test?

This test fails when images are served in legacy formats such as JPEG and PNG instead of modern alternatives like WebP or AVIF. Modern formats compress significantly better at equivalent visual quality, which means smaller transfers, faster page loads, and lower data usage for visitors on metered connections. Fixing this issue means generating modern variants and serving them to browsers that support them.

Example

<picture>
  <source srcset="/images/hero.avif" type="image/avif">
  <source srcset="/images/hero.webp" type="image/webp">
  <img src="/images/hero.jpg" alt="Marathon runners at sunrise" width="1600" height="900">
</picture>

Where to make the change

  • Raw HTML: use the <picture> element with multiple <source> entries so the browser picks the best supported format.
  • WordPress: WordPress 6.x and later supports WebP natively. Use a media optimization plugin to convert existing JPEGs and PNGs and serve modern formats automatically.
  • Shopify: Shopify's image CDN can serve WebP automatically; using the image_url filter with format parameter or the image_tag helper handles negotiation.
  • Wix or Squarespace: both platforms convert and serve WebP automatically when supported by the visitor's browser.
  • Headless or framework sites: components like next/image and astro:assets generate AVIF and WebP variants at build time and serve the best format per request.

Common causes and how to resolve them

  • Only legacy formats published: add a build step or image CDN that generates WebP and AVIF alongside the original.
  • Single-format <img> tag: wrap the image in <picture> with <source> entries for AVIF and WebP, falling back to the JPEG.
  • Image CDN not negotiating format: enable automatic format conversion or pass a format=auto query parameter (depends on provider).
  • SVG used where a raster image would be smaller (or vice versa): illustrations and icons should be SVG; photos should be raster in a modern format. Mixing them up wastes bytes.

Best practices

  • AVIF first, WebP fallback, JPEG last: AVIF compresses best, WebP is widely supported, JPEG remains the universal fallback.
  • Match quality to use case: hero images can use higher quality settings; thumbnails can drop quality without visible loss.
  • Use an image CDN: services like Cloudflare Images, Cloudinary, or Imgix handle resizing, format conversion, and caching in one step.
Identifies images served in legacy formats such as JPEG and PNG instead of modern alternatives like WebP or AVIF. Modern formats compress significantly better at equivalent visual quality, which means smaller transfers, faster page loads, and lower data usage for visitors on metered connections.
Image Metadata Test
72% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is not using images with large metadata.
Flags images carrying disproportionately large embedded metadata such as EXIF data, thumbnails, color profiles, geolocation, and camera information. This metadata is rarely useful on the web and adds bytes to every request without any rendering benefit, making it an easy win for shrinking image payloads.
Image Caching Test
95% of top 100 sites passed
This website is using cache headers for images and the browsers will display these images from the cache.
Inspects whether image responses include caching headers that allow browsers to store them for repeat visits. With proper caching directives, returning visitors retrieve images from the local cache instead of refetching them, producing noticeably faster subsequent page loads.
JavaScript Caching Test
96% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is using cache headers for all JavaScript resources.
Inspects whether external JavaScript files are served with caching headers that allow browsers to store and reuse them. Cached scripts skip the network on repeat visits, reducing load time and bandwidth for returning users without sacrificing the ability to push fresh code by versioning file URLs.
CSS Caching Test
98% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is using cache headers for all CSS resources.
Inspects whether external CSS files are served with caching headers that allow browsers to store and reuse them. Cached stylesheets skip the network on repeat visits, reducing load time for returning users while still allowing updates through versioned filenames.
JavaScript Minification Test
98% of top 100 sites passed
All JavaScript files used by this webpage are minified.
Detects whether external JavaScript files are minified by stripping whitespace, comments, and shortening identifiers. Minified scripts are substantially smaller and faster to download and parse, which lowers page load time and improves Core Web Vitals scores.
CSS Minification Test
100% of top 100 sites passed
All CSS resources used by this webpage are minified.
Detects whether external CSS files are minified by removing whitespace, comments, and unused characters. Minification reduces stylesheet size with no functional change, leading to faster downloads and quicker first render.
Render Blocking Resources Test
15% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is using render blocking resources! Eliminating render-blocking resources can help this webpage to load significantly faster and will improve the website experience for your visitors.

Render Blocking Resources Test

How to pass this test?

This test fails when JavaScript or CSS resources block the browser from rendering visible content. Each render-blocking file delays the first paint, and on slower networks the cumulative impact can be severe. Fixing this issue means inlining the truly critical CSS, deferring or asynchronously loading non-essential scripts, and removing unused code.

Example

<head>
  <!-- Inline only above-the-fold critical CSS -->
  <style>/* critical styles here */</style>

  <!-- Load full stylesheet asynchronously -->
  <link rel="preload" href="/styles/main.css" as="style"
        onload="this.onload=null;this.rel='stylesheet'">

  <!-- Defer non-critical scripts -->
  <script src="/scripts/app.js" defer></script>
</head>

Where to make the change

  • Application code or templates: identify the CSS and JavaScript needed for the initial render and load only those synchronously. Defer the rest.
  • Build pipeline: use a critical CSS extractor (such as critical or penthouse) to generate the above-the-fold styles automatically.
  • WordPress: performance plugins offer "delay JS execution" and "load CSS asynchronously" options that handle most of this without code changes.
  • Headless or framework sites: use the framework's preload and code-splitting hints to control what blocks rendering.

Common causes and how to resolve them

  • Single large stylesheet blocking render: inline critical CSS for the first viewport, load the full stylesheet asynchronously.
  • Synchronous third-party scripts in the head: add defer or async, or move them to the end of the body.
  • Web fonts blocking text rendering: add font-display: swap in @font-face rules so the fallback font shows immediately.
  • Render-blocking @import in CSS: replace with separate <link rel="stylesheet"> tags so the browser can fetch them in parallel.

Best practices

  • Use defer for scripts that need the DOM: they execute after parsing but before DOMContentLoaded.
  • Use async for fully independent scripts: they execute as soon as they download, in any order.
  • Preload the critical request chain: tell the browser early about fonts and key assets with <link rel="preload">.
  • Audit with Lighthouse: the Render-blocking resources audit lists every offending file with the estimated time saved by deferring it.
Identifies JavaScript and CSS resources that the browser must download and process before it can render visible content. Each render-blocking file delays the first paint, and on slower networks the cumulative impact can be severe. Inlining critical styles, deferring non-essential scripts, and removing unused code all help unblock the rendering path.
URL Redirects Test
97% of top 100 sites passed
This URL doesn't have any redirects (which could potentially cause site indexation issues and site loading delays).
Counts the number of HTTP redirects required for the URL to resolve to its final destination. Each hop adds latency and can dilute link equity, while long redirect chains sometimes confuse crawlers and indexing pipelines. Keeping redirects short and direct is a Google recommendation for both performance and SEO.
Time To First Byte Test
99% of top 100 sites passed
The Time To First Byte value of this webpage is 0.727 seconds. To provide a good user experience, Google recommends that sites should strive to have a TTFB of 0.8 seconds or less.
0.727 s
0.8 s
1.8 s
Measures Time to First Byte, the delay between the browser requesting the page and the first byte of the response arriving. TTFB reflects backend, network, and CDN performance and effectively sets the floor for every other loading metric, since rendering cannot begin until bytes start flowing. Sustained high TTFB usually points to slow server processing, missing edge caching, or inefficient redirects.
First Contentful Paint Test
90% of top 100 sites passed
The First Contentful Paint value of this webpage is 2.276 seconds. To provide a good user experience, Google recommends that sites should strive to have a First Contentful Paint value of 1.8 seconds or less.
2.276 s
1.8 s
3 s

First Contentful Paint Test

How to pass this test?

First Contentful Paint (FCP) measures the time from when the page starts loading to when any part of its content is rendered on the screen. FCP is the user's first visual confirmation that the page is loading, and faster values are strongly correlated with lower bounce rates and better Core Web Vitals scores. Fixing this issue means reducing time to first byte, eliminating render-blocking resources, and serving above-the-fold content without delay.

Where to make the change

  • Server and CDN: reduce TTFB so the browser receives bytes sooner. Edge caching for HTML produces dramatic FCP wins.
  • Application code or templates: inline the critical CSS for above-the-fold content and defer everything not needed for the first paint.
  • Build pipeline: ensure JavaScript bundles are split so the initial load only includes what is needed for first render.

Common causes and how to resolve them

  • Slow TTFB: address the underlying server, redirect, or hosting issue (see Time to First Byte fix).
  • Render-blocking CSS: inline the critical CSS for the first viewport, load the full stylesheet asynchronously.
  • Render-blocking JavaScript in the head: add defer or move scripts to the end of the body.
  • Web fonts delaying text rendering: add font-display: swap so a fallback font is shown immediately while the custom font loads.
  • Heavy hero image without prioritization: add fetchpriority="high" to the hero image and <link rel="preload"> for it in the head.

Best practices

  • Target sub-1.8 second FCP at the 75th percentile: Google's recommended threshold for a "good" experience.
  • Inline critical CSS: the styles needed for the first viewport should not require an extra network round trip.
  • Preload key resources: hero image, key fonts, and critical scripts benefit from explicit preload hints.
  • Defer non-critical work: analytics, chat widgets, and below-the-fold content can wait until after first paint.
Measures First Contentful Paint, the moment when the browser renders the first piece of visible content from the DOM, such as text, an image, or an SVG. FCP is the first signal to the user that the page is actually loading, and faster values are strongly correlated with lower bounce rates and better Core Web Vitals scores.
Largest Contentful Paint Test
77% of top 100 sites passed
The Largest Contentful Paint duration of this webpage is 2.28 seconds. To provide a good user experience, Google recommends that sites should strive to have Largest Contentful Paint of 2.5 seconds or less.
2.28 s
2.5 s
4 s
Largest Contentful Paint element within the viewport:
<img src="/assets/images/characters.png" width="750" height="738" alt="Illustrated slot characters, pirate ship and gold ..." loading="eager" decoding="async">
Measures Largest Contentful Paint, the time at which the largest visible element in the viewport, such as a hero image or main heading, finishes rendering. LCP is one of Google's Core Web Vitals and a direct ranking factor, used as a proxy for when the user perceives the page as effectively loaded.
Cumulative Layout Shift Test
91% of top 100 sites passed
The CLS score of this webpage is 0.0000. To provide a good user experience, Google recommends that sites should strive to have a CLS score of 0.1 or less.
0
0.1
0.25
Measures Cumulative Layout Shift, the total amount that visible elements move around unexpectedly while the page loads. Layout shifts cause users to misclick and feel the page is unstable, and CLS is one of Google's Core Web Vitals and a direct ranking factor. Common causes include images without explicit dimensions, late-loading fonts, and aggressively injected overlays such as cookie consent banners.

Server and security

Score:74
Failed:1
Warnings:0
Passed:6
URL Canonicalization Test
93% of top 100 sites passed
https://bc8888.id/ and https://www.bc8888.id/ should resolve to the same URL, but currently do not.

URL Canonicalization Test

How to pass this test?

This test fails when different URL variants of the site (apex versus www, HTTP versus HTTPS, with or without trailing slash) do not all resolve consistently to a single canonical version. When the same content is reachable at multiple URLs, search engines may split ranking signals across the variants. Fixing this issue means picking one canonical form for the site and 301-redirecting every other variant to it. See the Google Search Central canonicalization guide for the full specification.

Where to make the change

  • Server configuration: add 301 redirects in your web server config (Nginx, Apache, IIS) or via _redirects on Netlify, vercel.json on Vercel, or Cloudflare Page Rules.
  • CDN: most CDNs offer redirect rules that fire before the origin is hit, which is the cheapest way to enforce canonicalization.
  • Application code: as a backstop, applications can detect the wrong host or scheme and emit a 301 redirect to the canonical URL.

Common causes and how to resolve them

  • Both apex and www serve the same content: pick one (most sites prefer apex today) and 301-redirect the other to it permanently.
  • HTTP and HTTPS both serve content: redirect all HTTP requests to HTTPS, then add HSTS so browsers stop trying HTTP at all.
  • Trailing slash inconsistency: pick one form (with or without) and redirect the other.
  • Uppercase or mixed-case URLs: redirect uppercase paths to their lowercase canonical form.
  • Index page accessible at multiple paths: for example /index.html, /index.php, and / all serving the same content. Redirect everything to /.

Best practices

  • Use 301 (permanent) redirects: they pass the strongest ranking signal and are cached aggressively by browsers.
  • Pair with <link rel="canonical">: the canonical tag is a backup signal for cases the redirect cannot cover (parameterized URLs, syndicated content).
  • Avoid chains: redirect directly to the final URL in one hop.
  • Update internal links to canonical URLs: linking to non-canonical variants triggers unnecessary redirects on every visit.
Detects whether different URL variants of the site, such as the apex domain and the www subdomain or HTTP and HTTPS, all resolve consistently to a single canonical version. When the same content is reachable at multiple URLs without proper redirects, search engines may split ranking signals across the variants and become unsure which one to index.
SSL Checker and HTTPS Test
100% of top 100 sites passed
This website is successfully using HTTPS, a secure communication protocol over the Internet.
The certificate is not used before the activation date.
The certificate has not expired.
The hostname "bc8888.id" is correctly listed in the certificate.
The certificate should be trusted by all major web browsers.
The certificate was not revoked.
The certificate was signed with a secure hash.
Certificate Chain:
Server certificate
Common Name
bc8888.id
Subject Alternative Names
*.bc8888.id, bc8888.id
Not Valid Before
Sat, October 10, 2026 at 8:42:49 AM UTC
Not Valid After
Fri, January 8, 2027 at 8:42:48 AM UTC
Signature Algorithm
ecdsaWithSha384
Issuer
YE2
Intermediate certificate
Common Name
YE2
Organization
Let's Encrypt
Location
US
Not Valid Before
Wed, September 3, 2025 at 12:00:00 AM UTC
Not Valid After
Sat, September 2, 2028 at 11:59:59 PM UTC
Signature Algorithm
ecdsaWithSha384
Issuer
Root YE
Intermediate certificate
Common Name
Root YE
Organization
ISRG
Location
US
Not Valid Before
Wed, May 13, 2026 at 12:00:00 AM UTC
Not Valid After
Thu, September 2, 2032 at 11:59:59 PM UTC
Signature Algorithm
ecdsaWithSha384
Issuer
ISRG Root X2
Root certificate
Common Name
ISRG Root X2
Organization
Internet Security Research Group
Location
US
Not Valid Before
Fri, September 4, 2020 at 12:00:00 AM UTC
Not Valid After
Mon, September 17, 2040 at 4:00:00 PM UTC
Signature Algorithm
ecdsaWithSha384
Issuer
ISRG Root X2
Verifies whether the site is served over HTTPS with a valid TLS certificate. HTTPS encrypts the connection between visitor and server, protecting credentials and other sensitive data in transit, and Google has used it as a positive ranking signal since 2014. Modern browsers also flag non-HTTPS pages as Not Secure, which damages user trust.
Mixed Content Test (HTTP over HTTPS)
100% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage does not use mixed content - both the initial HTML and all other resources are loaded over HTTPS.
Detects whether a page served over HTTPS is loading any sub-resources such as images, scripts, or stylesheets over insecure HTTP. Mixed content weakens the security guarantees of HTTPS, and modern browsers either block the resources outright or warn the user, often breaking the page in the process.
HTTP2 Test
99% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is using the HTTP/2 protocol.
Verifies whether the page and its resources are delivered over HTTP/2 or newer, rather than the legacy HTTP/1.1 protocol. HTTP/2 introduces multiplexing, header compression, and prioritization, which together reduce latency and allow the browser to load many resources from the same origin far more efficiently.
HSTS Test
84% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is using the Strict-Transport-Security header.
strict-transport-security:max-age=31536000
Checks whether the server sends a Strict-Transport-Security header instructing browsers to only access the site over HTTPS. HSTS protects users from protocol downgrade attacks and accidental exposure to insecure connections, and is a baseline requirement for any site handling sensitive data.
Plaintext Emails Test
97% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage does not include email addresses in plaintext.
Scans the page for email addresses written in plain text. Spambots harvest such addresses to add them to bulk mailing lists, so obfuscating contact emails or replacing them with contact forms helps reduce inbox spam without hiding the address from legitimate visitors.
Unsafe Cross-Origin Links Test
45% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is not using target="_blank" links without rel="noopener" or rel="noreferrer" attribute.
Inspects external links opened in a new tab to confirm they include the noopener or noreferrer relationship attributes. Modern browsers now apply noopener implicitly to such links, so this is largely a defense for older browsers and a way to keep the destination page from running in the same process as the original tab. Including the attributes explicitly remains a security and performance best practice.

Mobile usability

Score:100
Failed:0
Warnings:0
Passed:3
Meta Viewport Test
92% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is using a viewport meta tag.
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1" />
Checks whether the page declares a viewport meta tag that controls how the layout scales on mobile devices. Without it, mobile browsers render the page at a default desktop width and shrink it to fit, producing unreadable text and unusable touch targets. A correct viewport declaration is the foundation of responsive design.
Media Query Responsive Test
98% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is using CSS media queries, which is the base for responsive design functionalities.
Detects whether the page's stylesheets use CSS media queries to adapt the layout to different screen sizes. Media queries are the primary mechanism for responsive design, allowing typography, spacing, and component arrangement to adjust gracefully from phones to large desktops. Because Google now indexes the web mobile-first, the responsive mobile layout is effectively the version search engines crawl, evaluate, and rank.
Mobile Snapshot Test
Mobile view
A rendered screenshot of how the page appears on a mobile device. Useful for visually confirming that responsive layouts work as intended and for spotting issues such as overflowing content, illegible text, or broken images that automated checks alone may miss.

Advanced SEO

Score:60
Failed:2
Warnings:1
Passed:6
Structured Data Test
66% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is using structured data.
Inspects the page for structured data markup such as JSON-LD or Microdata that follows schema.org vocabularies. Structured data helps search engines understand entities and relationships on the page, often unlocking rich result features in SERPs such as star ratings, FAQs, recipes, and product cards. It is also a primary signal AI answer engines use to extract precise facts when generating responses.
Custom 404 Error Page Test
80% of top 100 sites passed
This website is not using a custom 404 error page! Default 404 error pages result in a poor experience - it can mislead users into thinking an entire site is down or broken, greatly increases the chance they leave the website entirely, and looks unprofessional. We recommend to have a custom 404 error page in order to improve the website's user experience by letting users know that only a specific page is missing/broken (and not the entire site), providing them helpful links, the opportunity to report bugs, and potentially track the source of broken links.

Custom 404 Error Page Test

How to pass this test?

This test fails when the site does not serve a branded, helpful page for missing URLs. A custom 404 keeps users on the site by offering navigation, search, and suggested links rather than dropping them at the browser's generic error screen. Fixing this issue means designing a 404 template, ensuring it returns the correct HTTP 404 status, and pointing your server at it.

Where to make the change

  • Server configuration: point your web server at a custom 404 page. In Nginx, use error_page 404 /404.html;. In Apache, use ErrorDocument 404 /404.html.
  • WordPress: create a 404.php template in your theme. WordPress invokes it automatically for missing URLs.
  • Shopify: edit the 404.liquid template in the theme code editor.
  • Wix or Squarespace: use the platform's built-in 404 page editor in site settings.
  • Headless or framework sites: Next.js uses not-found.js, Astro uses 404.astro, and similar frameworks all have a convention for the missing-route page.

Common causes and how to resolve them

  • No custom 404 at all: create one. The minimum is the site header, navigation, a clear "page not found" message, and links to popular sections.
  • 404 page returns HTTP 200: a "soft 404" confuses search engines. Verify the response status with DevTools or curl, and configure the server to return 404 for missing routes.
  • 404 page redirects to homepage: redirecting users to the homepage hides broken URLs from analytics and search engines. Show a real 404 instead.
  • Generic browser error visible: the server is not invoking the custom template. Check the configuration directive.

Best practices

  • Keep the site chrome: show the header, footer, and navigation so users do not feel lost.
  • Offer next steps: a search box, popular links, or category navigation help users get back on track.
  • Track 404s: log missing-URL hits in analytics so you can spot broken inbound links worth fixing or redirecting.
  • Be clear about the error: "Sorry, that page does not exist" is better than vague messaging that confuses users.
Detects whether the site serves a branded, helpful page when a requested URL is not found, instead of the browser's generic error screen. A custom 404 keeps users on the site by offering navigation, search, or suggested links, which reduces frustration and protects engagement metrics that influence both UX perception and indirect SEO outcomes.
Noindex Tag Test
99% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage does not use the noindex meta tag. This means that it can be indexed by search engines.
Detects whether the page is being excluded from search engine indexes via a noindex directive in the robots meta tag or X-Robots-Tag HTTP header. A noindex on the wrong page is one of the most common ways important content silently disappears from search results, so verifying its absence on pages meant to rank is critical.
Canonical Tag Test
93% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is using the canonical link tag. This tag specifies that the URL: https://bc8888.id/ is preferred to be used in search results. Please ensure that this specification is correct, as canonical tags are often hard-coded and may not always reflect the latest changes in a site's URL structure.
<link href="https://bc8888.id/" rel="canonical"/>
Detects whether the page declares a canonical link tag indicating its preferred URL. Canonical tags consolidate ranking signals across duplicate or near-duplicate URLs onto a single authoritative version, which prevents search engines from splitting authority across variants caused by query parameters, session IDs, or alternate paths. They also help AI crawlers identify the source of truth when citing the page.
Nofollow Tag Test
This webpage does not use the nofollow meta tag. This means that search engines will crawl all links from this webpage.
Detects whether the page applies a nofollow directive, either through a robots meta tag, an X-Robots-Tag header, or per-link rel attributes, that tells search engines not to follow outbound links. Google recommends nofollow for sponsored links and for user-generated content where the linked sites are not vetted, so its presence or absence has real consequences for how link equity flows.
Disallow Directive Test
The robots.txt file does not use the disallow directive. This means that the whole website can be crawled by search engines.
Surfaces the disallow rules declared in the site's robots.txt file. Disallow directives tell search engine crawlers not to access specific files, paths, or directories, which is useful for keeping admin sections and duplicate content out of indexes but dangerous when applied too broadly, since over-blocking can hide important pages from search.
Meta Refresh Test
98% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is not using a meta refresh tag.
Detects whether the page uses a meta refresh tag to automatically reload or redirect after a delay. Meta refresh is largely obsolete, hurts accessibility by jumping focus and disorienting screen reader users, and is a weaker signal to search engines than a proper server-side 301 redirect. Its presence usually indicates outdated implementation worth updating.
SPF Records Test
94% of top 100 sites passed
This DNS server is not using an SPF record! SPF (Sender Policy Framework) allows administrators to specify which hosts are allowed to send mail from a given domain by creating a specific SPF record or TXT record in the Domain Name System (DNS). You can find more information about SPF records here.

SPF Records Test

How to pass this test?

The Sender Policy Framework (SPF) DNS record lists the mail servers authorized to send email on behalf of your domain. Receiving servers use it to verify that messages claiming to come from your domain are legitimate, which significantly reduces the chance of email being marked as spam. Fixing this issue means publishing an SPF record in your DNS that includes every legitimate sender and ends with a strict policy.

Example

example.com.  TXT  "v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:mailgun.org ~all"

Where to make the change

  • DNS provider: add a TXT record at the domain root with the SPF policy. Cloudflare, Route 53, Namecheap, GoDaddy, and similar all expose a TXT record editor.
  • Email providers: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, and most transactional email services publish their required SPF include directives in their setup documentation.

Common causes and how to resolve them

  • No SPF record at all: add one. Even a minimal record (v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all) is better than nothing.
  • Multiple SPF records: SPF only allows one TXT record per domain. Merge multiple records into a single one with all required include: directives.
  • Policy too permissive: ending with +all authorizes anyone to send as your domain. Use ~all (soft fail) or -all (hard fail) instead.
  • Missing legitimate senders: add an include: for every transactional email service (SendGrid, Mailgun, Postmark) and every marketing platform you use.
  • Too many DNS lookups: SPF caps include lookups at ten. Flatten or consolidate include: chains if you exceed it.

Best practices

  • Pair SPF with DKIM and DMARC: SPF alone is not enough. DKIM signs messages cryptographically; DMARC tells receivers what to do when SPF or DKIM fails.
  • Start with ~all, move to -all: soft fail lets you observe before strict enforcement. Move to hard fail once you are confident no legitimate sender is missing.
  • Test deliverability: tools such as MXToolbox SPF check or Google Postmaster Tools surface SPF problems before users complain.
  • Audit annually: as you add or remove email vendors, the SPF record needs to keep up.
Checks the domain's DNS for a Sender Policy Framework record. SPF lets receiving mail servers verify that messages claiming to come from the domain were actually sent by an authorized mail server, which significantly reduces the chance of legitimate email being marked as spam and protects the domain's sender reputation.
Ads.txt Validation Test
67% of top 100 sites passed
This website doesn't use an ads.txt file! Ads.txt is a text file that contains a list of Authorized Digital Sellers. The purpose of ads.txt files is to give advertisers and advertising networks the ability to verify who is allowed to sell advertising on your website.
Validates the format of the site's ads.txt file, which publishers use to declare which advertising vendors are authorized to sell their inventory programmatically. A correctly formatted ads.txt protects against domain spoofing in the ad supply chain and is required for inclusion in many premium advertising marketplaces.

Dominate search today on Google and AI Engines.

Join 85,000+ SaaS Marketers, Growth Agencies, Content-Led Companies and E-commerce Brands.

See Pricing
Dashboard preview showing SEO site checkup metrics, page group insights, and issue prioritization