Skip to main content
Archived

SEO Report for https://artworld.co.za

Your general SEO Checkup Score


SEO Score73/100
Average SEO score of top 100 sites: 75%This value indicates the average SEO score of the top 100 most visited websites in the US (in the past 12 months)
AI Visibility74/100
AI visibility score reflects brand reach in AI

Your site scored 73/100, below the 75 average for top sites. We found 12 issues to fix, and clearing them is how you move up. And an AI Visibility Score of 74/100 means ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity mention your brand some of the time, with clear room to push further.

12 Failed
2 Warnings
49 Passed

Want to fix these issues and track your progress?

Issues to fix

HIGH
To provide a good user experience, Google recommends that sites should aim for a Largest Contentful Paint duration of 2.5 seconds or less.
Details
HIGH
To improve the website experience for your visitors, it is recommended to eliminate any render-blocking resources on this webpage.
Details
HIGH
Users may abandon pages that take longer than 5 seconds to load, resulting in a potential loss of up to 50% of visitors. Faster loading pages can lead to increased traffic, better conversions, and higher sales.
Details
HIGH
JavaScript errors can impact user experience and may prevent users from viewing the page properly.
Details
MEDIUM
Serve properly sized images to reduce page loading times and to improve user's experience.
Details
MEDIUM
Avoid using distorted images, as they can have a negative impact on the user experience.
Details
MEDIUM
To provide a good user experience, Google recommends that sites should aim for a First Contentful Paint value of 1.8 seconds or less.
Details
MEDIUM
Consider using structured data in your webpage as it can help search engines gain a better understanding of your content.
Details
MEDIUM
Reducing the JavaScript execution time can result in faster page load times and a smoother user experience, as it allows the browser to render and display the page more quickly.
Details
LOW
Consider reducing the HTML size to improve loading times and retain visitors.
Details
LOW
Reducing the Document Object Model (DOM) size can lead to faster page loading times, improved site performance, and better user experience by decreasing the amount of time it takes for the browser to process and render the page.
Details
LOW
Using more than 20 HTTP requests on a webpage can negatively impact the loading time.
Details

AI Insights

Score:0
Failed:0
Warnings:0
Passed:5
Domain Business Context
Understanding the business context of a domain can help you create content that is more relevant to your target audience and differentiate your website from competitors.

What is this domain about

South African e-commerce store selling curated wall art, mounted canvas prints, framed art, and original paintings.

Industry Niche

Wall Art E-commerce

Target Audience

Homeowners, interior decorators, and businesses looking for stylish wall decor and art prints.

This test will check the business context of the domain associated with the analyzed webpage. The business context includes the domain's description, target audience and industry niche (if applicable). Understanding the business context of a domain can help you create content that is more relevant to your target audience and differentiate your website from competitors.
LLM Visibility Checker
LLM Visibility Checker

Track your brand across ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude

Get an AI Presence Score, see which of your pages get cited, and follow how you compare with competitors over time.

How visible your brand is to AI engines
Content Strengths and Weaknesses

This webpage is clear, visually merchandised, and strongly oriented toward product discovery and conversion. It offers broad catalog coverage and several trust cues, but it is light on educational depth and detailed product guidance.

Content Strengths

  • Clear Shopping Navigation
  • Strong Product Variety
  • Conversion-Focused Messaging

Content Weaknesses

  • Limited Editorial Depth
  • Sparse Product Detail
  • Few Credibility Details
This test will analyze the content of the webpage to identify its strengths and weaknesses. The analysis includes factors such as keyword usage, readability, originality, and relevance to the target audience. By understanding the strengths and weaknesses of your content, you can make informed decisions about how to improve it and better meet the needs of your audience.
Content Trust
68%
Topical Relevance96%
Subject Expertise62%
Credibility56%

This webpage appears moderately trustworthy because it shows clear commercial intent, policy links, and a long operating history since 2015. Trust is limited by the lack of visible company address, phone number, team bios, author attribution, and third-party validation on the page itself.

This test will evaluate the trustworthiness of the content on the webpage. It assesses factors such as the credibility of sources, accuracy of information, and overall reliability. A high level of content trust can enhance your website's reputation and improve its ranking in search engine results.
Visual SEO Analysis
Visual SEO Analysis

Find out if your page design converts the visitors you earn

We score six things that decide whether a visitor stays and acts, from the first screen to the path to action, and rank every fix by effort and impact.

How your page's design and UX affect conversions
Content Freshness
91%

The page looks current overall, with multiple freshness cues tied to the core shopping content, including weekly new art, new arrivals, and recent product/collection updates. Boilerplate copyright and policy links are current as well, and there are no strong signs of stale core content on the page.

Positive Signals

  • Weekly new art drops
  • New arrivals and trending collections
  • Recent product and collection updates

Staleness Signals

  • Some older collection image timestamps
  • Repeated legacy collection names
This test will check the freshness of the content on the webpage. It evaluates how recently the content was created or updated, and whether it remains relevant to current trends and user interests. Fresh content can attract more visitors and improve your website's ranking in search engine results.
Content Opportunities

The site already has strong merchandising breadth, but it could capture more demand by adding educational, comparison, and decision-support content around wall art selection and styling. There is also room to strengthen trust and differentiation with richer product context, customer proof, and expert-led guidance.

Quick Wins

  • •Add a short FAQ block on the homepage covering shipping, returns, and hanging.
  • •Expand the reviews section with customer names, room photos, and purchased product names.
  • •Write one-paragraph style notes for the top featured collections to explain who each collection suits.
This test will identify potential content opportunities for the webpage. It analyzes the current content landscape, identifies gaps in coverage, and suggests topics or keywords that could be targeted to attract more visitors and improve search engine rankings.

Common SEO issues

Score:76
Failed:3
Warnings:1
Passed:15
Meta Title Test
100% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is using a title tag.
Text: Award Winning Wall Art – Artworld
Length: 42 characters
The meta title is an HTML element that defines a page's title, displayed in search engine results, browser tabs, and bookmark lists. A concise, keyword-relevant title is a strong on-page ranking signal and a major driver of organic click-through rate. AI answer engines and LLM-driven search experiences also rely on the title to identify, summarize, and cite the page in generative results.
Meta Description Test
92% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is using a meta description tag.
Text: Explore Artworld's extensive collection of award-winning wall art, posters, ready-to-hang canvas, and framed art for sale. Each piece is meticulously handmade in South Africa.
Length: 175 characters
The meta description is an HTML tag that provides a short summary of a page's content, often shown beneath the title in search results. While not a direct ranking factor, an accurate and inviting description significantly improves click-through rate from organic listings. AI answer engines and social platforms also use it as a trusted summary when generating previews, citations and shareable snippets.
Google Search Results Preview Test
Desktop version
https://artworld.co.za/Award Winning Wall Art – ArtworldExplore Artworld's extensive collection of award-winning wall art, posters, ready-to-hang canvas, and framed art for sale. Each piece is meticulously handmade in South Africa.
Mobile version
https://artworld.co.za/Award Winning Wall Art – ArtworldExplore Artworld's extensive collection of award-winning wall art, posters, ready-to-hang canvas, and framed art for sale. Each piece is meticulously handmade in South Africa.
A simulated preview of how the page may appear in Google search results, combining the title, URL, and meta description as Google typically renders them. Useful for spotting truncated text, weak phrasing, or missing elements before publishing, since the snippet directly influences whether searchers click through.
Social Media Meta Tags Test
89% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is using social media meta tags.
Open Graph Meta Tags
og:site_nameArtworld
og:urlhttps://artworld.co.za/
og:titleAward Winning Wall Art
og:typewebsite
og:descriptionExplore Artworld's extensive collection of award-winning wall art, posters, ready-to-hang canvas, and framed art for sale. Each piece is meticulously handmade in South Africa.
Twitter Card Meta Tags
twitter:cardsummary_large_image
twitter:titleAward Winning Wall Art
twitter:descriptionExplore Artworld's extensive collection of award-winning wall art, posters, ready-to-hang canvas, and framed art for sale. Each piece is meticulously handmade in South Africa.
Open Graph and Twitter Card meta tags tell social platforms and link unfurlers how to display a page when its URL is shared. Well-formed tags produce richer previews with the intended title, description, and image, which improves click-through on social channels. They also serve as a structured signal that AI crawlers and answer engines can use when summarizing the page.
Most Common Keywords Test
There is likely no optimal keyword density (search engine algorithms have evolved beyond keyword density metrics as a significant ranking factor). It can be useful, however, to note which keywords appear most often on your page and if they reflect the intended topic of your page. More importantly, the keywords on your page should appear within natural sounding and grammatically correct copy.
39wall
24view
18gallery
18canvas
17prints
A frequency analysis of the most repeated words and phrases in the page's visible content. Useful for getting a quick sense of which topics search engines are likely to associate with the page, and for spotting cases where the actual content drifts from the intended subject.
Keywords Usage Test
48% of top 100 sites passed
The most common keywords of this webpage are distributed well across the important HTML tags. This helps search engines to properly identify the topic of this webpage.
Keyword
Title tag
Meta description
Headings
wall
view
gallery
canvas
prints
Cross-checks whether the most frequently used keywords on the page also appear in the title and meta description. Alignment between body content and metadata helps search engines confirm the page's topic and reinforces relevance for those terms.
Keywords Cloud Test
abstract
added
africa
african
animal
aqua
arrivals
arrived
artworks
artworld
bath
bathroom
bauhaus
beach
best
bestsellers
black
bloom
blue
botanical
bubble
canvas
cart
collection
collections
contact
contemporary
curated
curators
decor
drawings
earth
exclusively
featured
figurative
fine
flow
framed
frames
free
friends
gallery
gauguin
geometric
gogh
golden
grace
gustav
hang
home
inbox
join
just
kitchen
klee
klimt
landscape
line
look
master
masters
monochrome
mounted
nature
natures
neutral
original
paintings
paul
picasso
pick
piece
pink
posters
print
prints
products
ready
reviews
savannah
seascapes
shipping
shop
south
square
store
street
style
time
view
vincent
vintage
wall
walls
week
weekly
white
work
works
worth
A visual word cloud of the page's content, with more frequent terms shown in larger text. Provides a quick at-a-glance view of which words dominate the page, helping confirm that the visible content reflects the intended topic.
Competitor Domains Test
Competitor Domains

Understand your competitors' SEO and backlink profile

Get related competitors and their domain authority score in relation to your domain.

Identifies up to ten domains that compete for similar organic search results, ranked by overall domain authority based on the volume and quality of their backlink profiles. Useful for benchmarking the competitive landscape and prioritizing which sites to study for content and link-building strategy.
Heading Tags Test
62% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage contains too many H2 tags! H2 tags should re-inforce the related content of your page to search engines - too many tags may make the topic less clear, or look like spam tactics. Consider using less than 10 H2 tags.
H1 tags
Wall Art South Africa | Mounted Canvas Art, Framed Art & Wall Decor
H2 tags
Wall ArtFor Every Wall
Shop by Collection
Mounted Canvas Art
Featured Collections
Framed Art South Africa
Bestsellers
Wall Art Decor
Featured works
Bathtime Friends
Master Painters
What Our Collectors Say
Art Worth Owning. New Arrivals Worth Seeing.
Inspects the page for H1 and H2 heading tags and reports their structure. Headings give both users and search engines a clear outline of the page's topics, with the H1 acting as the primary subject and H2s framing major sections. A clean heading hierarchy also helps AI answer engines segment the content into discrete passages they can quote or summarize.
Robots.txt Test
99% of top 100 sites passed
This website is using a robots.txt file.
Verifies whether the site exposes a robots.txt file at the root domain. This file is the first resource most crawlers request, telling search engines and other bots which paths they may or may not access. It is also the standard mechanism for allowing or blocking modern AI crawlers used by training pipelines and answer engines.
Sitemap Test
83% of top 100 sites passed
This website has a sitemap file.
Looks for an XML sitemap on the site and reports whether one is published. Sitemaps give search engines an explicit, machine-readable list of the URLs you want crawled, along with metadata such as last-modified dates, which speeds up discovery of new and updated pages. They are especially useful for large sites or those with weak internal linking.
Image Alt Test
78% of top 100 sites passed
All "img" tags from this webpage have the required "alt" attribute.
Inspects whether images on the page include descriptive alt attributes. Alt text provides accessibility for screen readers, a fallback when images fail to load, and a textual signal that helps search engines understand image content. It also improves how AI crawlers and image search tools interpret and surface the visuals.
Responsive Image Test
29% of top 100 sites passed
Not all images in this webpage are properly sized! This webpage is serving images that are larger than needed for the size of the user's viewport.

Responsive Image Test

How to pass this test?

This test fails when one or more images on the page are served at dimensions significantly larger than the size at which the browser actually renders them. Fixing this issue means resizing the source files (or serving responsive variants) so the bytes downloaded match the pixels actually displayed. The result is faster page loads, lower data usage, and better Core Web Vitals scores.

Example

<img
  src="/images/hero-800.jpg"
  srcset="/images/hero-400.jpg 400w,
          /images/hero-800.jpg 800w,
          /images/hero-1600.jpg 1600w"
  sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 800px"
  alt="Marathon runners at sunrise"
  width="800" height="450">

Where to make the change

  • Raw HTML: use srcset and sizes to let the browser pick the right variant for the user's viewport. Always include intrinsic width and height attributes.
  • WordPress: WordPress generates multiple image sizes automatically. Use the the_post_thumbnail() helper or the block editor's image block, both of which emit responsive srcset markup.
  • Shopify: use the image_url Liquid filter with size parameters (for example {{ image | image_url: width: 800 }}) and pair with image_tag to emit a responsive image.
  • Wix or Squarespace: both platforms generate responsive variants automatically; this issue is typically caused by uploading a deliberately oversized image.
  • Headless or framework sites: use the framework's image component (for example next/image or astro:assets), which generates responsive variants and lazy-loads off-screen images.

Common causes and how to resolve them

  • Original camera or stock-photo file uploaded as-is: a 6000-pixel-wide JPEG rendered in a 400-pixel column wastes most of the bytes. Resize the source or generate responsive variants.
  • No srcset: the browser has no choice but to use the single source. Add multiple variants so mobile users get smaller files.
  • Hero images sized for ultra-wide displays: if your largest layout is 1600 pixels, do not ship a 4000-pixel original.
  • Background images set in CSS without responsive sources: use the image-set() CSS function or media queries to swap in different image files at different breakpoints.

Best practices

  • Generate variants at common widths: 400, 800, 1200, and 1600 pixels covers most viewports cleanly.
  • Always set width and height: intrinsic dimensions let the browser reserve space and avoid layout shift, helping CLS.
  • Lazy-load off-screen images: add loading="lazy" to images below the fold so the browser only downloads them when needed.
  • Pair with modern formats: resizing alone is good; resizing and serving WebP or AVIF compounds the savings.
Compares the natural dimensions of each image to the size at which it is actually rendered in the user's viewport. Serving images significantly larger than needed wastes bandwidth, slows page load, and forces the browser to scale assets unnecessarily, all of which hurt performance and user experience.
Image Aspect Ratio Test
75% of top 100 sites passed
Not all image display dimensions match the natural aspect ratio! Fix aspect ratio issues to avoid distorted images on this website!

Image Aspect Ratio Test

How to pass this test?

This test fails when one or more images are rendered at an aspect ratio meaningfully different from the source file's native ratio, producing stretched or squashed visuals. Fixing this issue means either using width and height attributes that match the file's real dimensions or replacing the source with a correctly proportioned crop.

Example

<!-- Source file is 1600 x 900 (16:9). Set matching attributes: -->
<img src="/images/marathon-1600.jpg"
     alt="Marathon runners at sunrise"
     width="1600" height="900"
     style="max-width: 100%; height: auto;">

Where to make the change

  • Raw HTML and CSS: set the width and height attributes to the source file's native dimensions. Use CSS height: auto when scaling responsively so the browser preserves the ratio.
  • WordPress: when inserting an image via the block editor, choose the image's intended size rather than overriding dimensions in custom CSS.
  • Shopify, Wix, or Squarespace: use the platform's built-in image cropper so the displayed crop matches the source file you upload.
  • Headless or framework sites: components like next/image require both width and height, which prevents distortion when the layout scales.

Common causes and how to resolve them

  • Hard-coded width and height that do not match the file: recompute them from the source dimensions or remove them and rely on the file's intrinsic ratio.
  • Container has a fixed height that crops the image: use CSS object-fit: cover if cropping is intentional, or change the container so the image keeps its natural ratio.
  • Wrong source file uploaded: swap in a correctly proportioned crop rather than stretching the wrong file in CSS.

Best practices

  • Always set both width and height: the browser uses these to reserve space and avoid layout shift before the image loads, which helps CLS.
  • Use object-fit when cropping is intentional: cover fills the container without distortion; contain letterboxes to preserve the full image.
  • Standardize on a few aspect ratios: picking one or two ratios per template makes it easier to crop assets consistently and avoid one-off distortions.
Compares each image's natural aspect ratio against the ratio at which it is displayed on the page. Significant mismatches result in stretched or squashed visuals that look unprofessional and degrade the user experience.
Deprecated HTML Tags Test
94% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage does not use HTML deprecated tags.
Scans the markup for HTML elements that are no longer part of the modern HTML specification. Deprecated tags may still render today, but browsers can drop support at any time, leading to broken layouts and rendering inconsistencies. Replacing them with current standards keeps the page resilient and easier to maintain.
Google Analytics Test
72% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is using Google Analytics.
Detects whether the page is instrumented with Google Analytics tracking code. Analytics is not an SEO ranking factor, but having reliable traffic and behavior data is essential for measuring the impact of SEO work and identifying opportunities for improvement.
Favicon Test
100% of top 100 sites passed
favicon
This website appears to have a favicon.
Verifies whether the site declares a favicon and that it loads correctly. Favicons appear in browser tabs, bookmarks, and increasingly in search engine result pages, where they reinforce brand recognition and make a listing easier to spot at a glance.
JS Error Test
83% of top 100 sites passed
We've found JavaScript errors on this webpage!

JS Error Test

How to pass this test?

This test fails when the browser encounters JavaScript runtime errors as the page loads. Unhandled errors can break interactive features, leave content unrendered, and signal poor code quality, all of which hurt the user experience that search engines factor into rankings. Fixing this issue means identifying the offending script, reproducing the error in DevTools, and shipping a patch that handles the failure cleanly.

Where to make the change

  • Open browser DevTools: the Console tab lists every error with the file, line number, and stack trace. Reproduce the issue locally and use sourcemaps to map back to the original code.
  • Application code: wrap risky operations in try / catch, validate external data before using it, and provide fallbacks when DOM elements or APIs are missing.
  • Third-party scripts: check whether the error originates in an analytics, advertising, or chat-widget script. If yes, contact the vendor or load the script with defer so it does not block the rest of the page.

Common causes and how to resolve them

  • Calling a method on null or undefined: guard with optional chaining (?.) or check the value exists before calling.
  • Race condition between the DOM and the script: wait for DOMContentLoaded or place the script tag at the end of <body> with defer.
  • Missing or 404 script file: a typo in the src attribute or a deleted asset triggers a load error. Fix the path or remove the tag.
  • Unsupported syntax in older browsers: if you support legacy browsers, transpile modern JavaScript with a tool such as Babel and serve appropriate polyfills.
  • CORS error blocking a fetch: the API must include the correct Access-Control-Allow-Origin header. Either configure the API or proxy the request through your own backend.

Best practices

  • Add error monitoring: a service such as Sentry, Bugsnag, or Datadog RUM captures errors from real users and groups them by frequency, so you fix what hurts most first.
  • Fail loudly in development, gracefully in production: log unexpected errors but never let them break the rendered page. Show a fallback UI instead of a blank screen.
  • Treat errors as bugs in the build: add lint rules and unit tests for the most common error paths so they cannot ship again.
  • Defer non-critical scripts: using defer or async on third-party scripts limits the blast radius when one of them throws.
Inspects the page for JavaScript runtime errors that occur as it loads. Unhandled errors can break interactive features, leave content unrendered, and signal poor code quality, all of which hurt the user experience that search engines factor into rankings.
Console Errors Test
27% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage doesn't have any warnings or errors caught by the Chrome DevTools Console.
Reviews the browser console for warnings and errors emitted while the page loads. Console messages often expose underlying issues such as failed network requests, deprecated APIs, or security warnings that can quietly degrade the experience even when the page appears to work.
Charset Declaration Test
96% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage has a character encoding declaration.
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Checks whether the page declares a character encoding such as UTF-8. Without an explicit charset declaration, browsers must guess the encoding, which can lead to garbled symbols, broken accented characters, and inconsistent rendering across devices. UTF-8 is the modern standard recommended by Google.

Speed optimizations

Score:58
Failed:8
Warnings:0
Passed:12
HTML Page Size Test
23% of top 100 sites passed
The size of this webpage's HTML is 81.6 Kb, and is greater than the average size of 33 Kb! This can lead to slower loading times, lost visitors, and decreased revenue. Good steps to reduce HTML size include: using HTML compression, CSS layouts, external style sheets, and moving javascript to external files.

HTML Page Size Test

How to pass this test?

This test fails when the raw HTML document weighs significantly more than necessary, even before counting images, CSS, or JavaScript. Bloated HTML increases time to first byte, slows parsing, and stalls rendering on mobile networks and lower-powered devices. Fixing this issue means trimming inline data, removing legacy markup, and keeping the document focused on what the user needs.

Where to make the change

  • Application code or templates: identify which sections produce the most bytes (often a large inline JSON blob, an inline base64 image, or a giant comment block) and refactor them to load externally or be removed.
  • WordPress: check for plugins or page builders that emit large inline configurations. Disable unused plugins and prefer themes that ship clean markup.
  • Shopify: theme code may inline large product or section JSON. Move heavy data to a fetch-on-demand endpoint when possible.
  • Headless or framework sites: review the rendered output for serialized state (for example __NEXT_DATA__ in Next.js) and trim what is sent on first paint by streaming or lazy-loading non-critical chunks.

Common causes and how to resolve them

  • Inline base64 images or fonts: move them to external files so the browser can cache them across requests.
  • Excessive inline CSS or JavaScript: link to external stylesheets and scripts so they cache. Inline only the truly critical CSS for above-the-fold content.
  • Large server-side JSON payloads: ship only the data needed for first render. Fetch the rest on demand.
  • Repeating boilerplate or commented-out code: strip comments and dead code in the production build.
  • HTML compression disabled: Gzip or Brotli compression often shrinks the response by half or more. Confirm the server sends the appropriate Content-Encoding header.

Best practices

  • Aim for under 100 KB of HTML: most pages can comfortably stay under this. Anything beyond a few hundred KB usually indicates structural bloat worth refactoring.
  • Enable compression: Gzip is the safe minimum, Brotli is even better for HTML and other text formats.
  • Defer non-critical content: rendering only what is needed for the initial viewport keeps both bytes and parse time down.
  • Audit periodically: add HTML size to your performance budget so regressions get caught in CI.
Measures the size of the raw HTML document, excluding images and external CSS or JavaScript. Bloated HTML increases time to first byte and parsing time, slowing down rendering on mobile networks and lower-powered devices. Trimming inline styles, redundant markup, and oversized inline data keeps initial load fast.
DOM Size Test
56% of top 100 sites passed
The Document Object Model (DOM) of this webpage has 1,702 nodes which is greater than the recommended value of 1,500 nodes! A large DOM size negatively affects site performance and increases the page load time.

DOM Size Test

How to pass this test?

This test fails when the page builds a Document Object Model with too many nodes or excessive nesting depth. Large DOMs increase memory usage, lengthen style and layout calculations, and slow rendering, particularly on mobile devices. Fixing this issue means simplifying the markup so the browser has less work to do on every interaction.

Where to make the change

  • Application code or templates: identify the heaviest sections (long lists, repeating components, deep grid wrappers) and either paginate them, virtualize them, or flatten the markup.
  • WordPress: heavy page-builder themes often emit deeply nested wrapper divs. Consider switching templates or using a theme that emits cleaner markup.
  • Headless or framework sites: use a virtualized list component for long item lists so only visible rows are rendered into the DOM.

Common causes and how to resolve them

  • Long lists rendered in full: show a paginated subset or virtualize the list so only on-screen items exist in the DOM.
  • Excessive wrapper divs: a stack of layout wrappers ten deep can usually be flattened to two or three with modern CSS layouts (Grid, Flexbox).
  • Hidden modals and dropdowns kept in the DOM: render them on demand instead of always emitting them with display: none.
  • Third-party widget injecting many nodes: a chat widget or carousel may add hundreds of nodes per page. Lazy-load it after main content renders.

Best practices

  • Aim for under 1500 nodes total and a maximum depth of 32: Lighthouse uses these as warning thresholds and they correlate with smooth rendering on mid-tier mobile devices.
  • Render only what is visible: long lists, accordions, and modals belong outside the initial DOM until needed.
  • Prefer flat semantic markup: a single <article> with a few children is faster than a deeply nested <div> tree.
  • Audit with Lighthouse: the DOM size audit reports the worst-offending elements, which often points at a single template that needs rework.
Measures the size and depth of the page's Document Object Model, the tree of nodes the browser builds from the HTML. Very large DOMs increase memory usage, lengthen style and layout calculations, and slow down rendering, particularly on mobile devices. Keeping the DOM lean improves both load time and runtime responsiveness.
HTML Compression/GZIP Test
99% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is successfully compressed using br compression on your code. The HTML code is compressed from 521.09 Kb to 81.6 Kb (84% size savings). This helps ensure a faster loading webpage and improved user experience.
Verifies whether the server delivers the HTML using a compression algorithm such as Gzip or Brotli. Compressed responses dramatically reduce transfer size with negligible decompression cost, translating directly into faster page loads, especially on slower connections.
Site Loading Speed Test
71% of top 100 sites passed
The loading time of this webpage (measured from N. Virginia, US) is around 10.43 seconds and is greater than the average loading speed which is 5 seconds!
Related Keywords

Accurate historical loading speed monitor and reports

Get detailed and accurate loading speed reports for your websites and see how your pages are being loaded over time.

Measures the overall time required to load the page in the browser. Page speed is a confirmed Google ranking factor and a strong driver of bounce rate, with slower pages losing a meaningful share of users before they even see the content. Faster pages also tend to convert better, making this a key metric for both SEO and revenue.
JS Execution Time Test
53% of top 100 sites passed
The JavaScript code used by this webpage is executed in more than 3.5 seconds! When the JavaScript code takes a long time to execute, it slows down the page performance in several ways: longer download times, main thread bottlenecks, delays of "Time To Interactive", memory leaks, etc.

JS Execution Time Test

How to pass this test?

This test fails when the browser spends excessive time parsing, compiling, and executing JavaScript while the page loads. Heavy JavaScript work blocks the main thread and is the primary cause of poor Interaction to Next Paint (INP), the Core Web Vital that replaced First Input Delay in 2024 and that Google uses as part of its ranking algorithms. Fixing this issue means shipping less JavaScript, splitting what remains, and deferring everything that is not needed for the initial interaction.

Where to make the change

  • Application code: audit your bundle with a tool such as Bundle Analyzer or Source Map Explorer. Identify the largest dependencies and either remove, replace, or lazy-load them.
  • Build configuration: enable code splitting so each route loads only its own chunk. Tree-shake unused exports from libraries.
  • Third-party scripts: the biggest INP wins often come from removing or deferring analytics, advertising, and tag-management scripts.

Common causes and how to resolve them

  • Single large bundle: split the bundle by route or feature so the user only downloads and executes the code for the current page.
  • Heavy third-party tags: load analytics, ads, and chat widgets after main content with async or defer, or move them into Google Tag Manager so they can be controlled centrally.
  • Unused JavaScript: audit with the Coverage tab in DevTools to find code that loads but never runs on the page. Remove or split it out.
  • Long tasks blocking the main thread: break work into smaller chunks with setTimeout, requestIdleCallback, or scheduler.yield(). Move heavy computation to a Web Worker.
  • Polyfills shipped to modern browsers: use modern-only bundles for ES2017+ and serve legacy polyfills only when needed via differential serving.

Best practices

  • Target sub-200 millisecond INP at the 75th percentile: this is the official "good" threshold for the Core Web Vital.
  • Ship less code: the cheapest JavaScript to execute is the JavaScript you never sent. Audit dependencies for lighter alternatives.
  • Defer non-critical scripts: use defer for scripts that need the DOM, async for fully independent ones.
  • Move CPU-intensive work off the main thread: Web Workers can handle large data transformations without freezing the UI.
Reports the total time the browser spends parsing, compiling, and executing JavaScript while the page loads. Heavy JavaScript work blocks the main thread and is the primary cause of poor Interaction to Next Paint, the Core Web Vital that replaced First Input Delay in 2024 and that Google uses as part of its ranking algorithms. Reducing bundle size and deferring non-critical scripts directly improves perceived performance.
Page Objects Test
7% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is using more than 20 http requests, which can slow down page loading and negatively impact user experience!
Content size by content type
Content type
Percent
Size
image
53.8 %
2.76 Mb
javascript
38.0 %
1.95 Mb
font
4.5 %
236.32 Kb
html
2.6 %
136.46 Kb
css
0.9 %
44.66 Kb
other
0.2 %
12.95 Kb
TOTAL
100%
5.13 Mb
Requests by content type
Content type
Percent
Requests
javascript
45.1 %
74
image
28.0 %
46
other
12.8 %
21
css
5.5 %
9
font
5.5 %
9
html
3.0 %
5
TOTAL
100%
164
Content size by domain
Domain
Percent
Size
artworld.co.za
44.3 %
2.27 Mb
cdn.shopify.com
35.6 %
1.83 Mb
googletagmanager.com
5.9 %
310.28 Kb
connect.facebook.net
3.8 %
200.93 Kb
cdn.qikify.com
3.5 %
186.16 Kb
images.loox.io
2.7 %
140.86 Kb
fonts.gstatic.com
2.1 %
111.81 Kb
loox.io
1.3 %
68.73 Kb
fonts.loox.io
0.2 %
9.17 Kb
storage.googleapis.com
0.1 %
6.80 Kb
Other
0.4 %
19.76 Kb
TOTAL
100%
5.13 Mb
Requests by domain
Domain
Percent
Requests
artworld.co.za
68.3 %
112
cdn.shopify.com
7.9 %
13
images.loox.io
3.0 %
5
fonts.gstatic.com
2.4 %
4
otlp-http-production.shopifysvc.com
2.4 %
4
connect.facebook.net
1.8 %
3
facebook.com
1.8 %
3
fonts.googleapis.com
1.2 %
2
loox.io
1.2 %
2
googletagmanager.com
1.2 %
2
Other
8.5 %
14
TOTAL
100%
164
Verifies that every resource the page requests, including images, scripts, stylesheets, and fonts, can be successfully retrieved. Broken or unreachable assets can leave the page rendered incorrectly, trigger console errors, and damage both user experience and how search engines perceive page quality.
CDN Usage Test
95% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is serving all images, javascript and css resources from CDNs.
Detects whether static assets such as images, JavaScript, and CSS are delivered through a Content Delivery Network. CDNs serve files from edge locations close to the user, reducing latency, improving cache hit rates, and offloading traffic from the origin server. The result is faster, more consistent page performance worldwide.
Modern Image Format Test
43% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is using images in a modern format.
Identifies images served in legacy formats such as JPEG and PNG instead of modern alternatives like WebP or AVIF. Modern formats compress significantly better at equivalent visual quality, which means smaller transfers, faster page loads, and lower data usage for visitors on metered connections.
Image Metadata Test
72% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is not using images with large metadata.
Flags images carrying disproportionately large embedded metadata such as EXIF data, thumbnails, color profiles, geolocation, and camera information. This metadata is rarely useful on the web and adds bytes to every request without any rendering benefit, making it an easy win for shrinking image payloads.
Image Caching Test
95% of top 100 sites passed
This website is using cache headers for images and the browsers will display these images from the cache.
Inspects whether image responses include caching headers that allow browsers to store them for repeat visits. With proper caching directives, returning visitors retrieve images from the local cache instead of refetching them, producing noticeably faster subsequent page loads.
JavaScript Caching Test
96% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is using cache headers for all JavaScript resources.
Inspects whether external JavaScript files are served with caching headers that allow browsers to store and reuse them. Cached scripts skip the network on repeat visits, reducing load time and bandwidth for returning users without sacrificing the ability to push fresh code by versioning file URLs.
CSS Caching Test
98% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is using cache headers for all CSS resources.
Inspects whether external CSS files are served with caching headers that allow browsers to store and reuse them. Cached stylesheets skip the network on repeat visits, reducing load time for returning users while still allowing updates through versioned filenames.
JavaScript Minification Test
98% of top 100 sites passed
All JavaScript files used by this webpage are minified.
Detects whether external JavaScript files are minified by stripping whitespace, comments, and shortening identifiers. Minified scripts are substantially smaller and faster to download and parse, which lowers page load time and improves Core Web Vitals scores.
CSS Minification Test
100% of top 100 sites passed
All CSS resources used by this webpage are minified.
Detects whether external CSS files are minified by removing whitespace, comments, and unused characters. Minification reduces stylesheet size with no functional change, leading to faster downloads and quicker first render.
Render Blocking Resources Test
15% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is using render blocking resources! Eliminating render-blocking resources can help this webpage to load significantly faster and will improve the website experience for your visitors.

Render Blocking Resources Test

How to pass this test?

This test fails when JavaScript or CSS resources block the browser from rendering visible content. Each render-blocking file delays the first paint, and on slower networks the cumulative impact can be severe. Fixing this issue means inlining the truly critical CSS, deferring or asynchronously loading non-essential scripts, and removing unused code.

Example

<head>
  <!-- Inline only above-the-fold critical CSS -->
  <style>/* critical styles here */</style>

  <!-- Load full stylesheet asynchronously -->
  <link rel="preload" href="/styles/main.css" as="style"
        onload="this.onload=null;this.rel='stylesheet'">

  <!-- Defer non-critical scripts -->
  <script src="/scripts/app.js" defer></script>
</head>

Where to make the change

  • Application code or templates: identify the CSS and JavaScript needed for the initial render and load only those synchronously. Defer the rest.
  • Build pipeline: use a critical CSS extractor (such as critical or penthouse) to generate the above-the-fold styles automatically.
  • WordPress: performance plugins offer "delay JS execution" and "load CSS asynchronously" options that handle most of this without code changes.
  • Headless or framework sites: use the framework's preload and code-splitting hints to control what blocks rendering.

Common causes and how to resolve them

  • Single large stylesheet blocking render: inline critical CSS for the first viewport, load the full stylesheet asynchronously.
  • Synchronous third-party scripts in the head: add defer or async, or move them to the end of the body.
  • Web fonts blocking text rendering: add font-display: swap in @font-face rules so the fallback font shows immediately.
  • Render-blocking @import in CSS: replace with separate <link rel="stylesheet"> tags so the browser can fetch them in parallel.

Best practices

  • Use defer for scripts that need the DOM: they execute after parsing but before DOMContentLoaded.
  • Use async for fully independent scripts: they execute as soon as they download, in any order.
  • Preload the critical request chain: tell the browser early about fonts and key assets with <link rel="preload">.
  • Audit with Lighthouse: the Render-blocking resources audit lists every offending file with the estimated time saved by deferring it.
Identifies JavaScript and CSS resources that the browser must download and process before it can render visible content. Each render-blocking file delays the first paint, and on slower networks the cumulative impact can be severe. Inlining critical styles, deferring non-essential scripts, and removing unused code all help unblock the rendering path.
URL Redirects Test
97% of top 100 sites passed
This URL doesn't have any redirects (which could potentially cause site indexation issues and site loading delays).
Counts the number of HTTP redirects required for the URL to resolve to its final destination. Each hop adds latency and can dilute link equity, while long redirect chains sometimes confuse crawlers and indexing pipelines. Keeping redirects short and direct is a Google recommendation for both performance and SEO.
Time To First Byte Test
99% of top 100 sites passed
The Time To First Byte value of this webpage is 0.009 seconds. To provide a good user experience, Google recommends that sites should strive to have a TTFB of 0.8 seconds or less.
0.009 s
0.8 s
1.8 s
Measures Time to First Byte, the delay between the browser requesting the page and the first byte of the response arriving. TTFB reflects backend, network, and CDN performance and effectively sets the floor for every other loading metric, since rendering cannot begin until bytes start flowing. Sustained high TTFB usually points to slow server processing, missing edge caching, or inefficient redirects.
First Contentful Paint Test
90% of top 100 sites passed
The First Contentful Paint value of this webpage is 3.516 seconds. To provide a good user experience, Google recommends that sites should strive to have a First Contentful Paint value of 1.8 seconds or less.
3.516 s
1.8 s
3 s

First Contentful Paint Test

How to pass this test?

First Contentful Paint (FCP) measures the time from when the page starts loading to when any part of its content is rendered on the screen. FCP is the user's first visual confirmation that the page is loading, and faster values are strongly correlated with lower bounce rates and better Core Web Vitals scores. Fixing this issue means reducing time to first byte, eliminating render-blocking resources, and serving above-the-fold content without delay.

Where to make the change

  • Server and CDN: reduce TTFB so the browser receives bytes sooner. Edge caching for HTML produces dramatic FCP wins.
  • Application code or templates: inline the critical CSS for above-the-fold content and defer everything not needed for the first paint.
  • Build pipeline: ensure JavaScript bundles are split so the initial load only includes what is needed for first render.

Common causes and how to resolve them

  • Slow TTFB: address the underlying server, redirect, or hosting issue (see Time to First Byte fix).
  • Render-blocking CSS: inline the critical CSS for the first viewport, load the full stylesheet asynchronously.
  • Render-blocking JavaScript in the head: add defer or move scripts to the end of the body.
  • Web fonts delaying text rendering: add font-display: swap so a fallback font is shown immediately while the custom font loads.
  • Heavy hero image without prioritization: add fetchpriority="high" to the hero image and <link rel="preload"> for it in the head.

Best practices

  • Target sub-1.8 second FCP at the 75th percentile: Google's recommended threshold for a "good" experience.
  • Inline critical CSS: the styles needed for the first viewport should not require an extra network round trip.
  • Preload key resources: hero image, key fonts, and critical scripts benefit from explicit preload hints.
  • Defer non-critical work: analytics, chat widgets, and below-the-fold content can wait until after first paint.
Measures First Contentful Paint, the moment when the browser renders the first piece of visible content from the DOM, such as text, an image, or an SVG. FCP is the first signal to the user that the page is actually loading, and faster values are strongly correlated with lower bounce rates and better Core Web Vitals scores.
Largest Contentful Paint Test
77% of top 100 sites passed
The Largest Contentful Paint duration of this webpage is 8.03 seconds. To provide a good user experience, Google recommends that sites should strive to have Largest Contentful Paint of 2.5 seconds or less.
8.03 s
2.5 s
4 s
Largest Contentful Paint element within the viewport:
<img src="https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0099/1697/3134/f..." alt="Wall art South Africa — framed canvas prints and o..." loading="eager" fetchpriority="high">

Largest Contentful Paint Test

How to pass this test?

Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) measures when the largest visible element in the viewport, such as a hero image or main heading, finishes rendering. LCP is one of Google's Core Web Vitals and a direct ranking factor, used as a proxy for when the user perceives the page as effectively loaded. Fixing this issue means identifying the LCP element and ensuring it loads as early as possible.

Where to make the change

  • Identify the LCP element: open Chrome DevTools, run a Performance trace, and find the LCP marker. The element it points at is the one to optimize.
  • Application code or templates: preload the LCP image, give it fetchpriority="high", and ensure it is in the initial HTML rather than injected by JavaScript.
  • Server and CDN: reduce TTFB and ensure the LCP image is served from a fast, geographically close origin.

Common causes and how to resolve them

  • Hero image loaded lazily: remove loading="lazy" from the LCP image; it should load eagerly.
  • LCP image not preloaded: add <link rel="preload" as="image" href="/hero.jpg" fetchpriority="high"> in the head so the browser fetches it before parsing the rest of the document.
  • LCP image too large or in legacy format: resize to displayed dimensions and serve as WebP or AVIF.
  • Slow TTFB or render-blocking resources: address the underlying TTFB and render-blocking issues; LCP cannot be fast if the page itself is slow to start.
  • Client-side rendered hero content: server-render or pre-render the LCP element so it appears in the initial HTML.
  • Web fonts delaying LCP text: use font-display: swap so the LCP heading renders immediately in a fallback font.

Best practices

  • Target sub-2.5 second LCP at the 75th percentile: the official Core Web Vitals threshold for a "good" experience.
  • Preload the LCP image: the single highest-impact LCP optimization on most sites.
  • Use fetchpriority="high": tells the browser to prioritize the resource ahead of others.
  • Ship modern image formats: AVIF and WebP cut hero image bytes substantially, which directly lowers LCP.
Measures Largest Contentful Paint, the time at which the largest visible element in the viewport, such as a hero image or main heading, finishes rendering. LCP is one of Google's Core Web Vitals and a direct ranking factor, used as a proxy for when the user perceives the page as effectively loaded.
Cumulative Layout Shift Test
91% of top 100 sites passed
The CLS score of this webpage is 0.0002. To provide a good user experience, Google recommends that sites should strive to have a CLS score of 0.1 or less.
0.0002
0.1
0.25
DOM element which contributes the most to CLS score:
Text: SHOP THE LOOK HOT
Html: <div class="awh-item">
Score: 0.0002
Measures Cumulative Layout Shift, the total amount that visible elements move around unexpectedly while the page loads. Layout shifts cause users to misclick and feel the page is unstable, and CLS is one of Google's Core Web Vitals and a direct ranking factor. Common causes include images without explicit dimensions, late-loading fonts, and aggressively injected overlays such as cookie consent banners.

Server and security

Score:100
Failed:0
Warnings:0
Passed:7
URL Canonicalization Test
93% of top 100 sites passed
Detects whether different URL variants of the site, such as the apex domain and the www subdomain or HTTP and HTTPS, all resolve consistently to a single canonical version. When the same content is reachable at multiple URLs without proper redirects, search engines may split ranking signals across the variants and become unsure which one to index.
SSL Checker and HTTPS Test
100% of top 100 sites passed
This website is successfully using HTTPS, a secure communication protocol over the Internet.
The certificate is not used before the activation date.
The certificate has not expired.
The hostname "artworld.co.za" is correctly listed in the certificate.
The certificate should be trusted by all major web browsers.
The certificate was not revoked.
The certificate was signed with a secure hash.
Certificate Chain:
Server certificate
Common Name
artworld.co.za
Subject Alternative Names
artworld.co.za
Not Valid Before
Mon, March 30, 2026 at 10:07:32 PM UTC
Not Valid After
Sun, June 28, 2026 at 10:07:31 PM UTC
Signature Algorithm
ecdsaWithSha384
Issuer
E7
Intermediate certificate
Common Name
E7
Organization
Let's Encrypt
Location
US
Not Valid Before
Wed, March 13, 2024 at 12:00:00 AM UTC
Not Valid After
Fri, March 12, 2027 at 11:59:59 PM UTC
Signature Algorithm
sha256WithRsaEncryption
Issuer
ISRG Root X1
Root certificate
Common Name
ISRG Root X1
Organization
Internet Security Research Group
Location
US
Not Valid Before
Thu, June 4, 2015 at 11:04:38 AM UTC
Not Valid After
Mon, June 4, 2035 at 11:04:38 AM UTC
Signature Algorithm
sha256WithRsaEncryption
Issuer
ISRG Root X1
Verifies whether the site is served over HTTPS with a valid TLS certificate. HTTPS encrypts the connection between visitor and server, protecting credentials and other sensitive data in transit, and Google has used it as a positive ranking signal since 2014. Modern browsers also flag non-HTTPS pages as Not Secure, which damages user trust.
Mixed Content Test (HTTP over HTTPS)
100% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage does not use mixed content - both the initial HTML and all other resources are loaded over HTTPS.
Detects whether a page served over HTTPS is loading any sub-resources such as images, scripts, or stylesheets over insecure HTTP. Mixed content weakens the security guarantees of HTTPS, and modern browsers either block the resources outright or warn the user, often breaking the page in the process.
HTTP2 Test
99% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is using the HTTP/2 protocol.
Verifies whether the page and its resources are delivered over HTTP/2 or newer, rather than the legacy HTTP/1.1 protocol. HTTP/2 introduces multiplexing, header compression, and prioritization, which together reduce latency and allow the browser to load many resources from the same origin far more efficiently.
HSTS Test
84% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is using the Strict-Transport-Security header.
strict-transport-security:max-age=7889238
Checks whether the server sends a Strict-Transport-Security header instructing browsers to only access the site over HTTPS. HSTS protects users from protocol downgrade attacks and accidental exposure to insecure connections, and is a baseline requirement for any site handling sensitive data.
Plaintext Emails Test
97% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage does not include email addresses in plaintext.
Scans the page for email addresses written in plain text. Spambots harvest such addresses to add them to bulk mailing lists, so obfuscating contact emails or replacing them with contact forms helps reduce inbox spam without hiding the address from legitimate visitors.

Mobile usability

Score:100
Failed:0
Warnings:0
Passed:3
Meta Viewport Test
92% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is using a viewport meta tag.
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1, maximum-scale=5, viewport-fit=cover" />
Checks whether the page declares a viewport meta tag that controls how the layout scales on mobile devices. Without it, mobile browsers render the page at a default desktop width and shrink it to fit, producing unreadable text and unusable touch targets. A correct viewport declaration is the foundation of responsive design.
Media Query Responsive Test
98% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is using CSS media queries, which is the base for responsive design functionalities.
Detects whether the page's stylesheets use CSS media queries to adapt the layout to different screen sizes. Media queries are the primary mechanism for responsive design, allowing typography, spacing, and component arrangement to adjust gracefully from phones to large desktops. Because Google now indexes the web mobile-first, the responsive mobile layout is effectively the version search engines crawl, evaluate, and rank.
Mobile Snapshot Test
Mobile view
A rendered screenshot of how the page appears on a mobile device. Useful for visually confirming that responsive layouts work as intended and for spotting issues such as overflowing content, illegible text, or broken images that automated checks alone may miss.

Advanced SEO

Score:74
Failed:1
Warnings:1
Passed:7
Structured Data Test
66% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage doesn't take the advantages of HTML Microdata or JSON-LD specifications in order to use structured data! View Google's guide for getting started with structured data.

Structured Data Test

How to pass this test?

Structured data is a standardized way to label the entities and relationships on a page so search engines and AI answer engines can understand them. Adding the right schema helps unlock rich result features in SERPs (star ratings, FAQs, product cards, recipes, events) and gives AI answer engines precise facts to extract when generating responses. Fixing this issue means picking the schema types that match your content and embedding them as JSON-LD inside the page <head>. See the Google Search Central structured data guide for the full type catalog.

Example

<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Article",
  "headline": "How to choose marathon running shoes",
  "author": { "@type": "Person", "name": "Jane Doe" },
  "datePublished": "2026-04-15",
  "image": "https://example.com/images/hero.jpg"
}
</script>

Where to make the change

  • Raw HTML: embed a JSON-LD block inside the <head>. JSON-LD is Google's preferred format because it does not interleave with visible content.
  • WordPress: a dedicated SEO plugin generates JSON-LD for articles, products, breadcrumbs, and FAQ blocks automatically. Customize the templates for non-standard content.
  • Shopify: Shopify themes emit Product schema by default. Extend with custom types via theme code edits.
  • Wix or Squarespace: built-in blocks for FAQ, recipe, and event content emit schema automatically.
  • Headless or framework sites: generate JSON-LD from your content data in the layout component so every page ships consistent schema.

Common causes and how to resolve them

  • No structured data at all: add at minimum the @type that matches the page (Article for blog posts, Product for product pages, Organization for the homepage).
  • Wrong schema type for the content: using Product schema on an article page misleads search engines. Pick the type that matches what the page actually is.
  • Required properties missing: each schema type has required fields. Validate with the Rich Results Test to surface missing properties.
  • Markup does not match visible content: Google penalizes structured data that asserts facts the page does not show. Reflect what is actually on the page.
  • Multiple conflicting blocks: a theme and an SEO plugin both emit schema for the same entity. Pick one source of truth.

Best practices

  • Validate before shipping: Google's Rich Results Test and Schema Markup Validator catch syntax errors and missing required fields.
  • Use JSON-LD: easier to maintain than Microdata or RDFa and Google's preferred format.
  • Cover the obvious wins: Article, Product, BreadcrumbList, Organization, and FAQPage are the highest-impact types for most sites.
  • Keep schema accurate: wrong or exaggerated schema can lead to Google removing rich result eligibility for the entire site.
Inspects the page for structured data markup such as JSON-LD or Microdata that follows schema.org vocabularies. Structured data helps search engines understand entities and relationships on the page, often unlocking rich result features in SERPs such as star ratings, FAQs, recipes, and product cards. It is also a primary signal AI answer engines use to extract precise facts when generating responses.
Custom 404 Error Page Test
80% of top 100 sites passed
This website is using a custom 404 error page. We recommend to have a custom 404 error page in order to improve the website's user experience by letting users know that only a specific page is missing/broken (and not the entire site), providing them helpful links, the opportunity to report bugs, and potentially track the source of broken links.
Detects whether the site serves a branded, helpful page when a requested URL is not found, instead of the browser's generic error screen. A custom 404 keeps users on the site by offering navigation, search, or suggested links, which reduces frustration and protects engagement metrics that influence both UX perception and indirect SEO outcomes.
Noindex Tag Test
99% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage does not use the noindex meta tag. This means that it can be indexed by search engines.
Detects whether the page is being excluded from search engine indexes via a noindex directive in the robots meta tag or X-Robots-Tag HTTP header. A noindex on the wrong page is one of the most common ways important content silently disappears from search results, so verifying its absence on pages meant to rank is critical.
Canonical Tag Test
93% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is using the canonical link tag. This tag specifies that the URL: https://artworld.co.za/ is preferred to be used in search results. Please ensure that this specification is correct, as canonical tags are often hard-coded and may not always reflect the latest changes in a site's URL structure.
<link href="https://artworld.co.za/" rel="canonical"/>
Detects whether the page declares a canonical link tag indicating its preferred URL. Canonical tags consolidate ranking signals across duplicate or near-duplicate URLs onto a single authoritative version, which prevents search engines from splitting authority across variants caused by query parameters, session IDs, or alternate paths. They also help AI crawlers identify the source of truth when citing the page.
Nofollow Tag Test
This webpage does not use the nofollow meta tag. This means that search engines will crawl all links from this webpage.
Detects whether the page applies a nofollow directive, either through a robots meta tag, an X-Robots-Tag header, or per-link rel attributes, that tells search engines not to follow outbound links. Google recommends nofollow for sponsored links and for user-generated content where the linked sites are not vetted, so its presence or absence has real consequences for how link equity flows.
Disallow Directive Test
Your robots.txt file includes a disallow command which instructs search engines to avoid certain parts of your website! You are advised to confirm if access to these resources or pages are intended to be blocked (e.g., if they contain internal-only content or sensitive information).
Surfaces the disallow rules declared in the site's robots.txt file. Disallow directives tell search engine crawlers not to access specific files, paths, or directories, which is useful for keeping admin sections and duplicate content out of indexes but dangerous when applied too broadly, since over-blocking can hide important pages from search.
Meta Refresh Test
98% of top 100 sites passed
This webpage is not using a meta refresh tag.
Detects whether the page uses a meta refresh tag to automatically reload or redirect after a delay. Meta refresh is largely obsolete, hurts accessibility by jumping focus and disorienting screen reader users, and is a weaker signal to search engines than a proper server-side 301 redirect. Its presence usually indicates outdated implementation worth updating.
SPF Records Test
94% of top 100 sites passed
This DNS server is using an SPF record.
v=spf1 ip4:41.203.10.162 +a +mx +ip4:197.189.204.18 +ip4:197.189.204.19 +ip4:197.189.204.20 +ip4:197.189.204.21 +ip4:197.189.204.19 ~all
Checks the domain's DNS for a Sender Policy Framework record. SPF lets receiving mail servers verify that messages claiming to come from the domain were actually sent by an authorized mail server, which significantly reduces the chance of legitimate email being marked as spam and protects the domain's sender reputation.
Ads.txt Validation Test
67% of top 100 sites passed
This website doesn't use an ads.txt file! Ads.txt is a text file that contains a list of Authorized Digital Sellers. The purpose of ads.txt files is to give advertisers and advertising networks the ability to verify who is allowed to sell advertising on your website.
Validates the format of the site's ads.txt file, which publishers use to declare which advertising vendors are authorized to sell their inventory programmatically. A correctly formatted ads.txt protects against domain spoofing in the ad supply chain and is required for inclusion in many premium advertising marketplaces.

Dominate search today on Google and AI Engines.

Join 85,000+ SaaS Marketers, Growth Agencies, Content-Led Companies and E-commerce Brands.

See Pricing
Dashboard preview showing SEO site checkup metrics, page group insights, and issue prioritization