seo site checkup logo
PricingFree ToolsArticles
Report generated 9 years ago
https://www.ispeakmin.com/notice/plagiarism
Your general SEO Checkup Score
Archived
93/100
SEO Score
Average SEO score of top 100 sites: 75%
This webpage received an SEO score of 93 out of 100, which is higher than the average score of 75. Our analysis has identified 13 SEO issues that can be addressed to further enhance your website's performance and improve its search engine visibility.
13 Failed
1 Warnings
27 Passed
Common SEO issues
Score: 73
Failed: 3
Warnings: 0
Passed: 9
Google Search Results Preview
Desktop version
https://www.ispeakmin.com/notice/plagiarism/关于马重奇等人涉嫌抄袭本论坛帖文之声明 | 海墘闽语论坛关于马重奇等人涉嫌抄袭本论坛帖文之声明
Mobile version
https://www.ispeakmin.com/notice/plagiarism/关于马重奇等人涉嫌抄袭本论坛帖文之声明 | 海墘闽语论坛关于马重奇等人涉嫌抄袭本论坛帖文之声明
Keywords Cloud
[转帖]清末传教士中与潮语相关的重要人物及著作(輶轩使者)潮学论坛全球华人的潮学论坛潮学网潮汕文化,潮学研究(ccgee.comappropriationauthor'sbodhisatuacarnivalchaucheckedcheungchicheungchina),斯坦福(stanford),年版第页,尾注”。choichou),辑入daviddoubleethnicityjiaoexpressionsfestivalgodshongideasinsouthispeakmin@gmail.com与我们取得联系。konglanguagemtr潮罗拼音方案说明贴_潮语吧_百度贴吧mtr潮罗方案说明贴(转)_潮语吧_百度贴吧one'soriginalplagiarismproofreadedpublicationreenforcingreligionsrepresentationstealingstudiesthoughtswilliam词典数字化workwrongful“海峡两岸闽南方言动态比较硏究”与輶轩使者毫不尊重,更是严重的学术不端,对此我们强烈谴责。世纪中期东南学术两篇相关文献的信息如下,阁下可以自行查验:中原作者疑将“深进”误写成“伸进”。马文照抄。中国社会科学出版社年月出版书籍主编书籍名称介绍了这部词典的编着历程和编写者。此部分疑被马重奇等人抄袭(在页)。但是,没有列明出处、将并非自己原创的部分“占为己有”,有意或者无意地,使读者误以为是原创的内容,此行为即构成剽窃。剽窃行为是对原创作者的伤害,也会降低原创者的积极性,有损知识的产生与传播。关于马重奇等人涉嫌抄袭本论坛帖文之声明其它信息出版信息华人浸信会教民的曼谷香港潮州跨国网络原作者将“菲尔德”和“斐女士”混用,马文中未做出统一。原帖“……年进一步伸进,到礐石(kakchiêh)建立教堂……”原帖“岁的……受美国浸信会……”原帖作者原帖内容是关于卓威廉辞典的数字化项目及进展,在【项目简述】部分,bodhisatua原帖地址原帖标题原贴中使用半角逗号之处,马文中也同样出现半角逗号。显示马重奇等人极有可能直接复制粘贴。发布于海墘闽语论坛的内容,正如大部分发表在互联网上的作品,只要恰当引用且列明出处,在多数情况下,是可以合理使用的。我们鼓励知识与资讯的流通。发布时间同一句话中,原作者为“礐石”标上潮语罗马字(kakchiêh)。马文照抄。而马文其他地方并没有出现过潮语罗马字,也没有说明这是潮语罗马字,显得突兀。同帖中关于a.m.fielde的介绍也疑被马重奇等人大段抄袭。和之前一样,马重奇等人照抄原文的瑕疵:国家社科基金重大项目子项目实为“美北浸信会”之误。马文照抄此错误。尊重他人的劳动成果,是基本的道德底线,也是从事学术研究的最低要求。马重奇等人的行为,不仅对网友岳峰年月日我们欢迎公众提供其他相关证据,或任何可能的援助,以助伸张正义。您可以通过海墘闽语论坛【管理申诉】板块或电子邮箱李榭熙此贴的楼(标题为“mtr与puj说明帖”)亦于年和年两次被网友转贴到百度贴吧(值得注意的是,当时转贴的网友都有注明来自ispeakmin.com):此贴(“清末传教士中与潮语相关的重要人物及著作搜集帖”)所在的楼曾被以下网站于年转载:海墘闽语论坛(www.ispeakmin.com)自创立以来,一直坚持为闽语爱好者和研究者提供交流平台。海墘闽语论坛的价值,源自于网友在此发布的个人原创的内容和有内涵的讨论。因此,当我们听闻年出版的一本学术著作有抄袭论坛的贴文时,我们立即采取了关切的行动。海墘闽语论坛管理团队海峡西岸闽南方言与文化研究涉抄袭章节涉抄袭章节与疑被抄袭贴文的帖子对比的帖子对比(点击下载大图)章节作者及相关信息第四章经检查,《海峡西岸闽南方言与文化研究》的参考文献部分也没有列出“李榭熙、岳峰”或“蔡志祥”。因此,可以合理怀疑,马重奇等人非但没有查证原帖的出处,反而有意删去有关的引用,或构成“间接抄袭”及有意误导编辑和读者。经检查,《海峡西岸闽南方言与文化研究》的参考文献部分(页)没有一处提到bodhisatua、輶轩使者或者相关帖子的网址。经网友检举、我们了解后发现,中国社会科学出版社年月出版、马重奇主编的《海峡西岸闽南方言与文化研究》一书第四章“西方传教士及其所著潮汕闽南方言学论著”(马重奇、马睿颖执笔)多处明显抄袭海墘闽语论坛年及年的部分贴文。现将详情罗列如下,供公众了解与判断:维基百科上关于剽窃的定义是这样写的:西方传教士及其所著潮汕闽南方言学论著详细信息輶轩使者马睿颖,女(年生),福建漳州人,福建师范大学外国语学院教师。马重奇马重奇等人对原帖中的瑕疵及原作者个人习惯都照抄不误:马重奇等人抄袭手法低劣、照抄原文瑕疵,无所忌惮,更应该付出代价。鉴于马重奇等人涉嫌利用抄袭所得出版书籍,并以此作为国家级项目的成果之一,事态严重且涉及公众利益,我们正积极考虑向有关机构投诉。马重奇,男(年生),福建漳州人,现任福建师范大学语言硏究所所长、文学院教授。(点击下载大图)
Competitor Domains Test
Understand your competitors' SEO and backlink profile

Get related competitors and their domain authority score in relation to your domain.

Robots.txt Test
  • Your site lacks a "robots.txt" file. This file can protect private content from appearing online, save bandwidth, and lower load time on your server. A missing "robots.txt" file also generates additional errors in your apache log whenever robots request one. Read more about the robots.txt file, and how to create one for your site.
Sitemap Test
  • Your site lacks a sitemap file. Sitemaps can help robots index your content more thoroughly and quickly. Read more on Google's guidelines for implementing the sitemap protocol.
Image Alt Test
  • Your webpage has 4 'img' tags and all of them contain the required 'alt' attribute.
Deprecated HTML Tags
  • Congratulations! Your page does not use HTML deprecated tags.
Google Analytics Test
  • Congratulations! Your website is using the latest version of Google Analytics.
Favicon Test
  • Your site either doesn't have a favicon or this has not been referenced correctly.
JS Error Checker
  • Congratulations! There are no severe JavaScript errors on your web page.
Speed optimizations
Score: 52
Failed: 2
Warnings: 1
Passed: 3
HTML Page Size Test
HTML Compression/GZIP Test
  • Your page do not use any HTML compression!
    You should compress your HTML to reduce your page size and page loading times - this will help your site retain visitors and increase page views. If you were using compression, you could be compressing your HTML size by 62 % - from 16.29 Kb to 6.19 Kb which would further reduce your page loading time.
Site Loading Speed Test
  • Your site loading time is around 1.736 seconds and this is under the average loading speed which is 5 seconds.
Accurate loading speed and website loading speed monitor

Get detailed and accurate loading speed reports for your websites and see how your pages are being loaded over time.

Register for free and use the Loading Speed Monitor from SEO Site Checkup Toolbox today and get valuable insights on how much time your customers need to wait until they see your page.

Page Objects
  • Congratulations, your page has fewer than 20 http requests. A higher number of http requests results in a user's browser needing to request a large number of objects from your server, which will ultimately slow down the loading of your web page.
Total Objects: 12
  • 3 HTML Pages
  • 2 CSS Files
  • 2 JS Files
  • 5 Images
  • 0 Flash Files
Image Caching Test
  • Your site is not using expires headers for your images. An expires tag can help speed up the serving of your webpages for users that regularly visit your site and see the same images. Learn more about how to add expires headers to your images.
See results list
URL Redirects Checker
  • Your URL performed one redirect! While redirects are typically not advisable (as they can affect search engine indexing issues and adversely affect site loading time), one redirect may be acceptable, particularly if the URL is redirecting from a non-www version to its www version, or vice-versa.
Server and security
Score: 80
Failed: 1
Warnings: 0
Passed: 2
URL Canonicalization Test
HTTPS Test
Plaintext Emails Test
  • We found 1 email addresses in your page code. We advise you to protect email links in a way that hides them from the spam harvesters.
Mobile usability
Score: 100
Failed: 0
Warnings: 0
Passed: 2
Media Query Responsive Test
  • Congratulations, your website uses media query technique, which is the base for responsive design functionalities.
Mobile Snapshot
Mobile view
Advanced SEO
Score: 60
Failed: 2
Warnings: 0
Passed: 4
Microdata Schema Test
  • Your webpage doesn't take the advantages of HTML Microdata specifications in order to markup structured data. View Google's guide for getting started with microdata.
Noindex Checker
  • Your webpage does not use the noindex meta tag. This means that your webpage will be read and indexed by search engines.
Canonical Tag Checker
  • Your page does not use the canonical link tag.
Nofollow Checker
  • Your webpage does not use the nofollow meta tag. This means that search engines will crawl all links from your webpage.
Disallow Directive Checker
  • Your site lacks a "robots.txt" file. This file can protect private content from appearing online, save bandwidth, and lower load on your server. A missing "robots.txt" file also generates additional errors in your apache log whenever robots request one.
See results list
SPF records checker
  • Your DNS server is not using an SPF record. SPF (Sender Policy Framework) allows administrators to specify which hosts are allowed to send mail from a given domain by creating a specific SPF record or TXT record in the Domain Name System (DNS). You can find more information about SPF records here.

seo site checkup logo
Website SEO, Monitoring & Automation Made Easy.
Product
  • Pricing
  • Free Tools
  • Articles
  • Login
  • Free 7-Day Trial
© SEO Site Checkup 2020-2026 • All rights reserved